Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rahul Jain and Ors. vs M/S Sr India Voyages Pvt. Ltd. .
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA(COMM) 300/2023, CM APPL. 65794/2023, CM APPL. 3143/2026 RAHUL JAIN AND ORS. .....APPELLANTS Through: Ms. Alka Chojar and Mr. Aashish Chojar, Advs.versusM/S SR INDIA VOYAGES PVT. LTD. . .....RESPONDENT Through: Ms. Gunika Gaba, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 02.02.20261. On 13.08.2025, the parties were referred to the mediation process.The Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre has filed a settlement agreement dated 10.10.2025 whereby the parties have settled their dispute pursuant to the judgment/decree dated 28.07.2023 of the District Judge, Commercial Court in CS (Comm.) 30/2023, which is the subject matter of this appeal. In paragraphs 4 & 5 of the settlement agreement, the following has been stated:- 4. That the Appellants/First Party herein agrees and gives his no objection that out of the deposited amount i.e. Rs. 4,62,000/- (Rupees F...
Karan Sagar vs Alka Bharti
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~5&6* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI(5)+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 304/2023 KARAN SAGAR .....Appellant Through: Mr. Varun Mittal, Ms. Bhavya Mishra, Advs.versusALKA BHARTI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Kumar Yadav, Adv. (6)+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 14/2024 ALKA BHARTI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sumit Kumar Yadav, Adv.versusKARAN SAGAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Varun Mittal, Ms. Bhavya Mishra, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 02.02.20261. Learned counsel for the parties inform that the matter has been settled between the parties and have already moved the first motion before the Family Court. Hence, they pray to withdraw the present appeals.2. In view of the above, the present appeals along with pending applications, if any, stand disposed of as withdrawn. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J RENU BHATNAGAR, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/bs/smThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court ...
Chayan Ghosh Chowdhury vs Punjab and Sind Bank Through Its Cpio & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~J* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment pronounced on: 02.02.2026 + W.P.(C) 12204/2025 CHAYAN GHOSH CHOWDHURY ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person.versusPUNJAB AND SIND BANK THROUGH ITS CPIO & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajat Arora, Mr. Niraj Kumar and Mr. Sourabh Mahla, Advocates. Mr. Dhruv Rohatgi, Ms. Chandrika Sachdev and Mr. Dhruv Kumar, Advocates for GNCTD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAJUDGMENT1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing the orderdated 20.03.2025 passed by the Central Information Commission (CIC) in Second Appeal No. CIC/PASBK/A/2024/615256, whereby the petitioners second appeal has been dismissed.2. The controversy arises in the context of an RTI application dated12.01.2024 filed by the petitioner. Essentially, the petitioner has sought service related records of the respondent no.2, who is stated to be a General Manager in Punjab and Sind Bank. The RTI application filed by the petit...
Smt Irshad Begum & Anr. vs Sh Pappu & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 02nd February 2026 + MAC.APP. 494/2023 SMT IRSHAD BEGUM & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar and Mr. Ritik Singh, Advs.versusSH PAPPU & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani and Ms. Niyati Jadaun, Advs. for R-3/Insurance Company.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENTANISH DAYAL, J: (ORAL)1. This appeal has been filed seeking enhancement of compensationawarded by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Dwarka Courts (hereinafter, Tribunal) by order dated 20th September 2022 in MACT No.1773/2016 whereby Rs.12,26,000/- was awarded at an interest of 9% p.a.2. The accident occurred on 22.09.2015 at about 2.30 p.m., when thedeceased/Mohd. Aleem along with his friend Meeraj was travelling on a motorcycle bearing no. UP-26F-1511 from Pilibhit to Puranpur. The offending vehicle being driven by respondent no.1/driver came from the opposite side and hit the deceased/Mohd. Aleem. As a result of t...
Shri Sumit Mehra and Ors vs Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 16441/2022 SHRI SUMIT MEHRA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. S. K. Rout, Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Ms. Alka, Mr. Rahul and Ms. Parmita, Advs.versusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Ms. Sapna Chauhan; Advocate, Ms. Bhumi Jain; AdvocateCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 02.02.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers: i) direct the Respondent No. 1 to reconstruct the entire original file of property bearing no. 30/25, Shakti Nagar, Delhi -110007; ii) direct the Respondent No. 1 to supply the original sale deed executed by it in favour of late Shri Bhola Nath Mehra after its due reconstruction in a time bound manner.2. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are the owners of property bearing No. 30/25, Shakti Nagar, Delhi-110007.3. When the matter came up for hearing before this Court on 13.04.2...
Two Way Containers Line Private Limited vs Rinku Devi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1417/2022 TWO WAY CONTAINERS LINE PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: None.versusRINKU DEVI .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 02.02.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. No one has appeared on behalf of both the parties.3. As no one has appeared on behalf of the parties, the matter is passed over and be called again at 02:30 PM. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/nd/tp At 2:40 PM4. At this stage, no one has appeared on behalf of either of the parties.5. As no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed in default. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/nd/tpThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Serv...
Radha & Ors. vs Balram Meena & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 1299/2025 RADHA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Harish Plaha, Adv.versusBALRAM MEENA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, SC, Ms. K. K. Kiram Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. M.S. Akhtar and Ms. Joohu Kumari, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 02.02.20261. The present petition alleges wilful disobedience / non-compliance ofdirections contained in the judgment dated 10.03.2025, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 2983/2025, titled as Radha & Ors. vs. Land Acquisition Collector & Anr. The operative directions therein are as under: 6. In view of the above, we consider it apposite to bind down the respondents to the statement made on their behalf. We direct the LAC to decide the representation dated 11.11.2024 as expeditiously as possible and within a period of eight weeks from date. The LAC shall ensure that if necessary, the reference is forwarded to the learned ADJ in the ...
Smt Smita S Kushwaha vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~37 to 69 * IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 2nd February, 2026 + W.P.(C) 19100/2025 & CM APPL. 79494/2025 KAUSHALYA MEENA .....PetitionerUNLON OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rohan Jaitley, CGSC with Mr. Viplav Acharya, SPC, Mr. Yogya Bhatia, Advocate for UoI. + W.P.(C) 19103/2025 & CM APPL. 79501/2025 ANIL KUMAR JHA .....Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Himanshu Sethi, SPC with Mr. Sanjay Pal, GP. Mr. Rishabh Sahu, SPC with Mr. Sameer Sharma and Mr. Karan Malhotra, GP. + W.P.(C) 19107/2025 MD NASIR ALAM .....PetitionerDigitally Signed W.P.(C) 19100/2025 and connected matters Page 1 of 22 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Umang Chopra, SPC with Mr. Karan Malhotra, GP. + W.P.(C) 19187/2025 MANOJ KUMAR AGARWAL .....Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shashank Bajpai, CGSC with Ms. Aashna Mehra and Mr. Vatsal Tripathi, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 11962/2025 & CM ...
Richa Soni vs Utkarsh Soni
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 02.02.2026 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 313/2025 RICHA SONI .....Appellant Through: Mr. R.D. Singh, Mr. Vibhuti Zibbu, Advs.VersusUTKARSH SONI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kumar Solanki, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARRENU BHATNAGAR, J. (ORAL)1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 19(1) of theFamily Courts Act, 1984 assailing the Order dated 23.07.2025 (hereinafter referred to as Impugned Order) passed in M.Civ No. Application under Order IX Rule 13 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the "CPC") filed on behalf of the Appellant/wife for setting aside the ex-parteJudgment and Decree of Divorce dated 31.05.2022 passed in HMANo. 301/2022 has been dismissed.2. The briefs facts in which the present appeal arises are that the Appellant and the Respondent got married on 14.06.2011 at Ajmer, Rajasthan, in...
Sumeet Chadha & Anr. vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13248/2025 & CM APPL. 54374/2025 SUMEET CHADHA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Taksh Suri, Advocate.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal and Ms. Shilp Ohri, Advocates for MCD. Mr. Anuj Berry, Ms. Gauri Pasricha and Mr. Parimal Kashyap, Advocates for R-2. Ms. Deeksha L. Kakar, Mr. Rashneet Singh and Ms. Sana Parveen, Advocates for R-4. Mr. Raghvendra Upadhyay, Ms. Purnima Jain, Mr. Swaraj Maurya and Mr. Ankit Jaiswal, Advocates for GNCTD. Mr. Kshitij Chhabra, Advocate for R- 6 and R-7. Mr. M.K. Madan, Advocate for R-8 along with R-8. Mr. Gaganmeet Singh Sachdeva, Mr. Harshpreet Singh Chadha and Mr. Hridyesh Kanna, Advocates for DDA.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 02.02.20261. A fresh status report has been filed on behalf of respondent/MCD in terms of the order passed by this Court on 18th November, 2025. W.P.(C) 13248/2025 Page 1 of 2 1.1 T...
- ‹ Prev
- 456
- 457
- 458
- 459
- 460
- 462
- 463
- 464
- 465
- 466
- Next ›
- Last »