Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India & Anr. vs Raj Kumar Manocha
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 17418/2025, CM APPL. 71976/2025 and CM APPL. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Jagdish Chandra Solanki, CGSC with Mr. Siddharth Bajaj and Mr. Sujeet Choudhary, Advocates.versusRAJ KUMAR MANOCHA .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 02.02.20261. The present petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitutionof India assailing the order dated 11.11.2024 (hereafter impugned order) passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (CAT) in O.A No. 4031/2023.2. Briefly stated, the Respondent was initially appointed in IndianRailways Account Service in 1987 and during his posting, was allotted House No.23D, Railway Officers Colony, S.P Marg, New Delhi. In 2017, while the Respondents request for transfer to Modern Coach Factory, Rai Bareilly was pending, he was transferred on promotion to East Coa...
Bahadur Singh vs the State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4396/2025 BAHADUR SINGH ..... Applicant Through: Mr. J.P. Singh, Mr. Kanishk, Ms. Priyanka Tomar, Advs.VersusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Khatri, SSC for NCB alongwith and Ms. Shelly Dixit, Adv. NCB and with Mr. Sandeep Kumar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 02.02.20261. By virtue of the present bail application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the applicant seeks grant of regular bail in proceedings arising from complaint being Crime No.VIII/81/DZU/2021 registered at PS.: Narcotics Control Bureau, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 8/20/25/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act).2. Initially, an FIR No.471/2021 dated 30.09.2021 was registered at PS.: Narayana, Delhi under Sections 20/25/29 of the NDPS Act by the Delhi Police. However, vide order dated 14.12.2021...
Kailash Chand & Ors. vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 8220/2025 & CRL.M.A. 34303/2025 KAILASH CHAND & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP. SI Satbir Singh, PS-Najafgarh. Appearance not given for R2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 02.02.20261. The petitioners have approached this Court under Section 528 ofthe Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]), seeking quashing of FIR No. 620/2021 dated 07.12.2021, registered at Police Station Najaf Garh, Delhi, for offences punishable under Sections proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground that the disputes between the parties have been amicably settled.2. The petition is taken up for disposal with the consent of learned counsel for the parties.3. The petitioners, as well as respondent No. 2, are present before the Court an...
Uoi & Ors. vs V.S.Dahiya & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~71, 74 & 78* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3136/2006 & W.P.(C) 3137-3139/2006 KIRAT RAM & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 4377/2007 & CM APPL. 8202/2007 U.O.I & ORS .....Petitioners SANJAY KAUSHIK & ORS .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 4668/2008 & CM APPL. 9007/2008 V.S.DAHIYA & ORS. .....RespondentsCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 02.02.20261. Learned counsel representing the Petitioners submits that in compliance of the order passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, the Respondents who were working as LaboratoryAssistants have been granted revised pay scale of 4,000-6,000, with effect from 01.01.1996, as per recommendations of Vth Central Pay Commission and the Respondents have already demitted office after attaining the age of superannuation.2. They submit that while leaving the question of law open, the writ petitions may be disposed of as the Petitioners do not...
Gayasuddin vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 02.02.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 10/2026 GAYASUDDIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nasimuddin and Mr. Ajay Singh Tomar, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with IO/SI Sharneya. Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate for prosecutrix. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. The accused/applicant seeks interim bail in case FIR No. 167/2025 of Police Station Jamia Nagar for the offence under Section2. In furtherance of last order, it is submitted by learned counsel for accused/applicant that he had filed some document but the same is lying under objections.3. The prosecutrix present with her counsel and identified Investigating Officer/WSI Sharneya also submits that she wants to get married with the accused/applicant. The prosecutrix is stated to be major in age. BAIL APPLN. 10/2026 Page 1 of 2 pagesGIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a7...
Mantosh Kumar vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi Through Its Commission ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 18056/2025 MANTOSH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mojahid Karim Khan and Mr. Falak Zaidi, Advs.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddhant Nath, SC for MCD with Mr. Bhavishya Makhija, Mr. Amaan Khan, Advs. Mr. Vinay Kaushik, GP with Insp. Sandeep Ms. Urvi Mohan, Adv. Mr. Ayush Gaur, SPC with Ms. Ridhi Kapoor, Mr. Abhishek Budhiraja for R-4 and 5CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 02.02.20261. This hearing has been through hybrid mode.2. The Petitioner is a street vendor who is vending in Shahdara Southzone, Ward-18E, New Delhi. It is his case that he has been given a mobile vending certificate and the same ought to be converted to a stationary street vending certificate.3. The Court has perused the matter. The Certificate of Vending (hereinafter CoV) of the Petitioner clearly states the Type of Vendor as OTHERS. However, the terms and c...
Rupesh Kumar Pandey & Anr. vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 8432/2025 & CRL.M.A. 35219/2025 RUPESH KUMAR PANDEY & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shaurya Bhatnagar, Mr. Ritish Chauhan, Advocates with P-1 & 2, Alongwith P-1 & P-2 in person.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with SI Chetan, PS-Paschim Vihar. Mr. Atul Gupta, Advocate for R-2 Alongwith R-2 in person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 02.02.20261. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure [CrPC]), seeking quashing of FIR No. 330/2022 dated 19.03.2022, registered at Police Station Paschim Vihar West, Outer District, Delhi, under Sections proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue Notice. Ms. Manjeet Arya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Notice is accept...
Kaushalya Meena vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~37 to 69 * IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 2nd February, 2026 + W.P.(C) 19100/2025 & CM APPL. 79494/2025 KAUSHALYA MEENA .....PetitionerUNLON OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rohan Jaitley, CGSC with Mr. Viplav Acharya, SPC, Mr. Yogya Bhatia, Advocate for UoI. + W.P.(C) 19103/2025 & CM APPL. 79501/2025 ANIL KUMAR JHA .....Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Himanshu Sethi, SPC with Mr. Sanjay Pal, GP. Mr. Rishabh Sahu, SPC with Mr. Sameer Sharma and Mr. Karan Malhotra, GP. + W.P.(C) 19107/2025 MD NASIR ALAM .....PetitionerDigitally Signed W.P.(C) 19100/2025 and connected matters Page 1 of 22 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Umang Chopra, SPC with Mr. Karan Malhotra, GP. + W.P.(C) 19187/2025 MANOJ KUMAR AGARWAL .....Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shashank Bajpai, CGSC with Ms. Aashna Mehra and Mr. Vatsal Tripathi, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 11962/2025 & CM ...
Hfl Youdhisthir Singh Rted vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 02.02.2026 + W.P.(C) 226/2026 HFL YOUDHISTHIR SINGH RETD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Maitreyee Jagat Joshi, CGSC, Mr. Vidur Dwivedi, GP, Ms. Bhawna and Mr. Ayush Kasana, Advs. Sgt Mritunjay, for Union of India, DAV Legal Cell Air ForceCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAV. KAMESWAR RAO, J. (ORAL)1. This petition lays a challenge to the order of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (Tribunal, for short) dated22.07.2025 in Original Application (OA, for short) 566/2021 and orderdated 09.12.2025 in Review Application No. 29/2025 in OA No. 566/2021 whereby the Tribunal has dismissed the OA and the review application filed by the petitioner.2. The facts that are noted from the petition are that the petitioner was enrolled in the Indian Air Force in the year 1979....
Joydeep Sinha vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4752/2025 JOYDEEP SINHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S. Chakraborty, Advocate (VC)versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for the State alongwith SI Abhishek, P.s.-EOWCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 02.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 3506/2026 (withdrawal)1. The applicant has filed the present application seeking withdrawal of the captioned bail application, being BAIL APPLN. 4752/2025.2. Mr. S. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the applicant, submits that an application for regular bail has been filed before the learned Magistrates Court, and that the applicant intends to pursue the said application.3. In view of the aforesaid, the present application is allowed and stands disposed of. Accordingly, the captioned bail application, alongwith any pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn.4. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the application pending ...
- ‹ Prev
- 464
- 465
- 466
- 467
- 468
- 470
- 471
- 472
- 473
- 474
- Next ›
- Last »