Delhi Court December 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anuj Ghaiand & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~64 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 6216/2019 Date of decision:04. 12.2019 ANUJ GHAIAND & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Saran Suri, Mr. Roshan Kumar and Mr. Shobhit Chandra Sharma, Advs. STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State with Inspector Virender Dalal, SHO/ Malviya Nagar and SI Deepak Tanwar, PS Malviya Nagar R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 41827/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6216/2019 and CRL.M.A. 41826/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.609/2016 dated 28.07.2016, registered at Police Station Malviya Nagar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C. 6216/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State.6. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The...
Asif vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~58 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 6193/2019 Date of decision:04. 12.2019 ASIF STATE & ANR Through: Mr. Shashank Vats, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai, APP for State R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 41774/2019 (Exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6193/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.394/2013 dated 17.10.2013 registered at Police Station Shahdara, Delhi and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. Notice issued.5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2. CRL.M.C.6193/2019 Page 1 of 3 6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the r...
Santosh Rawat vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P. 705/2016 Date of Decision:04. 12.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: SANTOSH RAWAT ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. B. N. Sharma, Mr. Summinder Paswan and Mr. V. P. Singh, Advocates. STATE & ORS Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for R-1/State. Mr. D. D. Tripathi, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present revision petition has been filed for setting aside the impugned judgment dated 26.10.2016 passed by the learned Special Judge (P. C. Act), CBI-03, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner challenging the judgment dated 19.09.2015 and the order on sentence dated 07.10.2015 was dismissed and the petitioner was held Crl. Rev. P. 705/2016 Page 1 of 3 guilty for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the N. I. Act, 1881 and was sentenced to undergo SI for a period of one year alongwith compensation of Rs.7,00,000/- and in default of...
Ashok Kumar Chaudhary & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h November, 2019 Pronounced on:4th December, 2019 W.P. (C) 12059/2019 + ASHOK KUMAR CHAUDHARY & ORS. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. versus Through: Mr. Anand Nandan, Advocate. ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel for GNCTD. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH JUDGMENT Talwant Singh, J.CM APPL. 46679/2018 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P. (C) 12059/2019 2. The... Petitioners have challenged an order dated 16th July, 2018 passed in OA No.362/2015 by Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) Principal Bench, New Delhi by which their original application was disposed of by passing the following order: 6. In the circumstances and for the aforesaid reasons, the OA is disposed of by permitting the applicants to submit an appropriate representative for leave benefits and bonus, and on receipt of such a representation from the applicants, the W.P. (C) 12...
Gulfam vs.mohd Bilal & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:04. 12.2019 RC.REV. 654/2019 & CM APPL. 52292/2019, CM APPL. 51814-15/2019 GULFAM versus MOHD BILAL & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. A. Maitri, Advocate For the Respondent: None. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APP No.49776/2018 For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The Revision Petition is taken up for consideration today itself. The next date i.e. 11.12.2019 is cancelled. RC.REV. 654/2019 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 07.05.2019, whereby eviction petition filed by the respondent has been allowed under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 on the ground of bonafide RC.REV.654/2019 Page 1 of 7 necessity.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14...
Sr. Divisional Manager, Lic of India vs.renuka Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:04. h December, 2019 W.P.(C) 6692/2014 SR. DIVISIONAL MANAGER, LIC OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Soumyajit Pani, Mr. Chittaranjan Singh, Advocates versus RENUKA SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Inder Jit Singh, Advocate along with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT The petitioner has challenged the award of the Industrial Tribunal 1. whereby the Industrial Tribunal set aside the penalty of removal from service of the respondent and imposed penalty of reduction of three stages of basic pay of time scale in lieu of penalty for removal from service.2. The respondent was working with the petitioner as an Assistant with effect from 01st March, 1994. On 25th March, 2008, the respondent applied for and was granted leave for 35 days from 11th April, 2008 to 15th May, 2008 for going to Singapore on the ground that her husband had been deputed in a job in Singapore. On expiry of th...
Arun Kumar vs.dr. Harsh Vardhan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI EL.PET. 7/2019 ARUN KUMAR Reserved on:22. 10.2019 Date of decision :04. 12.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Dr.S.S. Hooda, Adv. versus DR. HARSH VARDHAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Nikhil Goel, Mr.Dushyant Sarna & Mr.P. Harold, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA I.A. No.12439/2019 1. This petition arises out of the election for Chandni Chowk Parliamentary Constituency, which took place in May, 2019 for the 17thLok Sabha, wherein the respondent was declared as the successful candidate from the said constituency.2. The petitioner, who claims to be a registered voter from the Chandni Chowk constituency, has challenged the election of the respondent alleging Corrupt Practice under Section 123(2) of The Representation of the People Act, 1951(hereinafter referred to as the Act), on the following grounds: (i) Suppression of the actual Purchase Price of the property bearing flat No.122, 2nd Floor, Delhi Apartment CGHS Ltd. Plot No.15-C, ...
Kartar Singh & Anr vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4192/2019 Reserved on:23. 10.2019 Pronounced on:04. 12.2019 KARTAR SINGH & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Mahipal Singh Drall, Adv. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.K.K. Ghai, APP for State. Insp.Sunil Kumar, SHO/Alipur. Mr.Atul Guleria, Adv. with Mr.Gautam Mann, Adv. for R-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to set aside/quash impugned order dated 06.02.2019 passed by learned ASJ, (North) District Courts, Rohini Courts Delhi in the interest of justice and equity.2. Brief facts of the case are that in the intervening night of 29/30.08.2018 at about 1:00 AM, petitioner No.l was informed by Mr. Vikas, friend of Mr. Ashish Kumar s/o petitioner No.l, that Ashish Kumar CRL.M.C. 4192/2019 Page 1 of 21 has been arrested by the local police and taken to Police Station, Alipur, Delhi.... Petition...
Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust (Regd) vs.north Delhi Municipal Corpor ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~50 & 51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h December, 2019 + + CM (M) 1725/2019 CM (M) 1726/2019 RAM DHARI JINDAL MEMORIAL TRUST (REGD) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Mr. Saurabh Tiwari and Ms. Tejaswini, Advocates. (M:9810064790) versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akhil Mittal, Standing Counsel for North DMC. (M:9212504099) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 52111/2019 (exemption) in CM (M) 1725/2019 CM APPL. 52113/2019 (exemption) in CM (M) 1726/2019 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications are disposed of. CM (M) 1725/2019 & CM APPL. 52110/2019 (direction) CM (M) 1726/2019 & CM APPL. 52112/2019 (direction) 2. The present petitions have been filed by the... Petitioner - Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust (Regd.), which is running the Jindal International School on its land at Village Shahbad Daulatpur, Sector-28, Rohini, Delhi. The case of the... Petition...
Anil @ Bunty vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN.2768/2019 Date of Decision :04. 12.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: ANIL @ BUNTY STATE Through : versus Mr.Jai Ram Garg, Advocate. ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State with SI Nishu Sangwan, PS South Rohini CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant seeking regular bail in case FIR No.99/2018 under Sections 376D/506 IPC, 6 POCSO Act and 66E/67 (A) Information Technology Act registered at PS South Rohini. Status report is on record.2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated; no incriminating material has been recovered from the his possession; the mobile phone was recovered from the co- accused Himanshu who has already been discharged. It is further submitted that at the time of medical examination, the mother of the prosecutrix has refused the internal exa...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »