Delhi Court December 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Alliance of People S Movement and Ors vs.delhi Development Au ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h December, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11103/2017 and CM No.45419/2017 NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF PEOPLE S MOVEMENT AND ORS Through: Mr. Fidel Sebastian, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sagar, Standing Counsel with Ms. Nazia Praveen, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Anil soni, CGSC with Mr. Devesh Dubey, Adv. for R-UOI Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Adv. for R-DUSIB CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % ORDER0512.2019 D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) W.P.(C) 11103/2017 1. This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers : a. to quash and set aside the demolition notice dated 5.12.2017 issued by the Rl, DDA; W.P.(C) 11103/2017 Page 1 of 3 b. direct Rl, DDA to produce before the Court the complete layout and plan for the so called 80 feet construction of the Yogashram Road connecting outer Ring Road with Maharaja Agrasen Marg...
Rajni Gupta @ Rajnee & Anr vs.the State & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3869/2019 Date of decision:04. 12.2019 RAJNI GUPTA @ RAJNEE & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Anoop Kumar, Adv. with Mr.Vikas Saini, Mr.Manish Malik, Mr.Dinesh Madeshiya & Mr.Jai Subhash Thakur, Advs. versus THE STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. SI Sanjeev Kumar PS Gandhi Nagar. Respondent nos.2&3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.363/2014 dated 25.05.2014, registered at Police Station Vivek Vihar, for the offences punishable under Sections 3IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and respondent nos.2 2.3. & 3. CRL.M.C.3869/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.5. The present petition is filed on the ground that ...
Nikhil Singh & Ors vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~59 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 6196/2019 NIKHIL SINGH & ORS. Date of decision:04. 12.2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohammad Sajid, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghei, APP for State with W/SI Sushma, PS Uttam Nagar Mr. Pradeep Kumar, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 41782/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6196/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.369/2016 dated 08.04.2016 registered at Police Station Uttam Nagar, New Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C. 6196/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 11.06.2015...
Praveen Bansal & Anr vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2805/2019 PRAVEEN BANSAL & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Shiv Charan Garg Imran Khan, with Mr Advocates. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Sanjay Lao, ASC with Singh for Karanjeet Mr Sharma, Advocate State. SI Sanjay Kumar, P.S. Prasad Nagar. Mr Sunil Upadhyay, Advocate for R2 to R8. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % VIBHU BAKHRU, J ORDER0412.2019 The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, praying 1. that the FIR No.60/2012 under Section 323/325/308/3of the IPC, registered with PS Prasad Nagar and all proceedings emanating therefrom, be quashed. The said petition is premised on a settlement arrived at between 2. the petitioner and respondent nos. 2 to 8.3. The petitioner was engaged in the construction of a building at W.P.(CRL) 2805/2019 Page 1 of 5 Plot No.E-16/1103, Tank Road, Bapa Nagar. The said building collapsed in the intervening night of 30.0...
Shri Mahavir & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4330/2019 Date of decision:04. 12.2019 SHRI MAHAVIR & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.S.A. Rajput, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. Through Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. ........ RESPONDENTS ASI Pushpender Pal Singh DIU/West Distt. Respondent no.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 34755/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4330/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.404/2012 dated 21.09.2012, registered at Police Station Uttam Nagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 452/323/5IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C.4330/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and respondent no.2.6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The present petition is file...
Vikas Jha & Ors vs.state (Nct) of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:04. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 371/2019 VIKAS JHA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vikas Padora and Mr. Vaibhav Aggarwal, Advs. versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State with W/SI Renu and W/SI Radha, PS Delhi Cantt. Mr. Krishan Kumar, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.113/2018 registered at Police Station Delhi Cantt. and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. Notice issued.3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is CRL.M.C.391/2019 Page 1 of 3 taken up for final disposal.5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent No.2 has no objection if the present p...
Central Bureau of Investigation vs.sanjeev Kumar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P.793/2019 Date of Decision :04. 12.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ........ Petitioner Mr.Mridul Jain, Spl.PP. Through : versus SANJEEV KUMAR & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Dinesh Garg, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.39227/2019 (u/S482Cr.P.C.) in Crl.Rev.P.793/2019 1. The present application has been filed by the respondents seeking clarification as to whether the petitioner/CBI can play the CDs containing recordings before the trial court. He has drawn the attention of this Court to the order dated 16.10.2019 passed by the trial court whereby the trial court permitted the counsel to seek clarification on the said aspect.2. It is noted that earlier, vide judgment dated 23.09.2019, an application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner/CBI to recall three witnesses, namely Nikhil Malhotra, S.K.Khullar and the complainant-Vijender Singh ...
Ashwani Sharma & Ors vs.the State & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3870/2019 Date of decision:04. 12.2019 ASHWANI SHARMA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Anoop Kumar, Adv. with Mr.Vikas Saini, Mr.Manish Malik, Mr.Dinesh Madeshiya & Mr.Jai Subhash Thakur, Advs. versus THE STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. SI Pravesh Kumar PS Vivek Vihar. Respondent nos.2 & 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.362/2014 dated 25.05.2014, registered at Police Station Vivek Vihar, for the offences punishable under Sections 3IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and respondent nos.2 & 3 4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal. CRL.M.C.3870/2019 Page 1 of 2 5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the part...
Sunil Verma vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:04. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6157/2019 SUNIL VERMA Through: Mr. Ravi Chawla and Mr. Avi Kalra, ........ Petitioner versus Advs. STATE & ORS Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS with SI Pawan, PS - EOW CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 41601/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6157/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby directing the learned Metropolitan Magistrate for early disposal of application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. or in alternative, direct the concerned SHO, EOW, New Delhi to lodge an FIR against the respondent Nos.2 & 3 as per the provisions of law. CRL.M.C. 6157/2019 Page 1 of 4 4. The case of the petitioner is that learned Trial Court has been sitting on the file since the past 160 days, as the case is pending orders on the application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. a...
Punjab National Bank & Anr vs.s K Kardam
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :20. 11.2019 Judgment pronounced on :04. 12.2019 + LPA1602019, CM Appl. 10499/2019 PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ANR ..... Appellants Through Mr. Rajesh Gautam & Ms. Sakshi Gaur, Advocates. versus S K KARDAM ..... Respondent Through Mr. Raman Gandhi & Ms. Harsha Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.1. The present appeal assails the order dated 06.02.2019 passed by a Learned Single Judge of this Court whereby the Learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent and has directed the appellants herein to promote the respondent with all consequential benefits with effect from the date other officers were promoted pursuant to the DPC held in 2015.2. Shorn of unnecessary details the relevant facts necessary for adjudication of the present appeal are that the respondent herein was initially appointed as a clerk-cum-cashier on 12.02.1981. H...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »