Delhi Court December 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kulbir Singh vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2019
$~3 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4787/2019 Date of decision:03. 12.2019 KULBIR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Umesh Gupta, Adv. with Ms.Sushma, Adv. with petitioner in person. versus STATE & ANR Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State. SI Gurbachan Singh PS Burari. Respondent no.2 in person. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby JUDGMENT (ORAL) quashing FIR No.591/2017 dated 13.10.2017, registered at Police Station Burari, for the offence punishable under Section 354(C) IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and respondent no.2.4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent No.2 has no objection if the present CRL...
Akm Enterprises Private Ltd vs.vesta Holding Private Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI3d December, 2019 Date of decision:10. h October, 2019 CS(OS) 1020/2009 & IA No.386/2019 (u/O VIII R-1A(3) CPC) VESTA HOLDING PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Azhar Alam, Mr. Sankalp Goswami, Advs. Versus AKM ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .... Defendants Through: Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Dubey, Mr. Rajmangal Kumar and Mrs. Akshita Sachdev, Advs. AND + CS(OS) 1016/2010 & IA No.389/2019 (u/O VII R-14 CPC) AKM ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Dubey, Mr. Rajmangal Kumar and Mrs. Akshita Sachdev, Advs. Versus VESTA HOLDING PRIVATE LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Azhar Alam, Mr. Sankalp Goswami, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 CS(OS) No.1020/2009, as per amended plaint dated 22nd October, 2011, is filed for recovery of Rs.28,12,50,000/- along with pendente...
Larsen & Toubro Limited vs.experion Developers Pvt. Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 234/2019 Reserved on :17. 10.2019 Pronounced on:03. 12.2019 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar & Mr. Akhil Sibal, Senior Advocates with Mr. Kirat Singh Nagra, Mr. Kartik Yadav, Mr. Pranav, Mr. Parinay T. Vasandani, Mr. Karanvir Singh, Mr. Shantanu Parashar & Ms. Manjira Dasgupta, Advocates versus EXPERION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi & Mr. Arvind Nayar, Senior Advocates with Mr. Krishna Vijay Singh, Mr. Manish Dembla, Mr. Nachiketa Goyal, Mr. Pradyuman Sewar & Mr. Parakram Roy, Advocates for respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.1. This is a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking interim injunction restraining the respondents from invoking Retention Money Bank Guarantees (RMBG) for Rs.13,84,35,000/- each dated 18.04.2014 and 08.09.2014 respectively as well as Perform...
Smt Sunita vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:03. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 3600/2019 SMT SUNITA Through: Mr. R.S. Rai, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. K.K. Ghai, APP for State with SI ........ RESPONDENTS Prakash, PS - Burari CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.1433/2015 dated 20.11.2015 registered at PS Burari and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State.4. With the consent of all the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent No.2 has no objection if the present CRL.M.C.3600/2019 Page 1 of 2 petition is allowed.6. Respondent No.2 is personally present in Court and he has been identified by SI - Prakash /IO, PS - Burari and submits that matter ...
Hari Krishna Bhandari & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2019
$~53 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 6172/2019 Date of decision:03. 12.2019. HARI KRISHNA BHANDARI & ORS STATE & ANR Through Adv. (appearance not given) versus Through Mr. K.K. Ghei, APP for State ....... Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Udit Gupta with Mr. A. Singh, Advs. for R-2 Insp. Gulshan, PS Sultan Puri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT Crl. M.A. 41678/2019 JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.A. 41679/2019 In view of the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. CRL.M.C . 6172/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.588/2014 dated 30.05.2014 registered at Police Station Sultanpuri and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C. 6172/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the ...
Pawan Bhati vs.state (govt.of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on 03.12.2019 + BAIL APPLN. 2461/2019 PAWAN BHATI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Charan Singh, Advocate. versus THE STATE(GOVT. of NCT of Delhi ..... Respondent Through Mr. G.M.Farooqui, APP for State. SI Rajeshwar: PS Palam Village CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J.(Oral) 1. Vide this order, I shall dispose of a bail application filed u/s. 439 CrPC by the petitioner Pawan Bhati in FIR No.151/2019, u/s. 363/366/376/5IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act, P.S. Palam Village, Delhi.2. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has prayed for bail on the ground that petitioner is innocent and falsely implicated. He is well educated person and has clean antecedents. It is submitted that petitioner is BAIL APPLN. 2461/2019 Page 1 of 6 distant cousin of the prosecutrix. Prosecutrix was introduced to the main accused Pawan s/o Amar Singh by the petitioner. The present case was got registered just to extort money ...
Rajdeep Jain & Anr vs.sharp Air Systems Pvt Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2019
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + C.R.P. 278/2019 Judgment delivered on:03. 12.2019 RAJDEEP JAIN & ANR ........ Petitioners versus SHARP AIR SYSTEMS PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Raghav Sharma, Advocate Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA None. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 51958/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.R.P. 278/2019 1.... Petitioners impugn order dated 03.07.2019 whereby the application of the petitioners under Order VII Rule 11 (a) of the CPC has been dismissed.2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that plaint does not disclose a cause of action qua the petitioners who were C.R.P. 278/2019 Page 1 of 5 defendants No.1 and 2 in the Suit and the trial court dismissed the application by applying the ratio of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Madhav Prasad Aggarwal & Anr. v. Axis Bank Ltd. & Anr., (2019) ...
Umesh Kumar vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. A. 1093/2019 Reserved on :19. 11.2019 Date of Decision :02. 12.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: UMESH KUMAR Through: Mr. Archit Upadhayay (DHCLSC) ... Appellant STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Versus ... Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with ASI Praveen Kumar, P.S. Anand Parbat CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI1 The present appeal has been filed assailing the judgment of conviction dated 02.08.2019 and order on sentence dated 02.08.2019 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge in FIR No.430/2016 registered under Sections 308/354B/354/323/506 (Part-I)/509 IPC PS Anand Parbat.2. The appellant was convicted and sentenced to undergo SI for 6 months for the offence punishable under Section 323 IPC and SI for 1 year for the offence punishable under Section 354 IPC. It was directed that both the sentences would run concurrently. The benefit of Section 428 Cr.P.C. was also awarded by the trial court.3. The facts of the case, as noted by the tria...
Animesh vs.the Central Board of Secondary Education
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2019
$~1 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA1202019 ..... Appellant ANIMESH THE CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION Through: Mr. Ranjit Sharma, Advocate with appellant in person. versus Through: Mr. Amit Bansal, Ms. Seema Dolo and Mr. Vipasha Mishra, Advocates. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON % The appellant/petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 07.12.2018, ORDER0212.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing a writ petition filed by him for issuing directions to the respondent/Central Board of Secondary Education (in short CBSE) to revaluate his answer sheet of the Economics paper, for which he had sat in his Grade XII examination, in the academic year 2017-18.2. The facts of the case lie in a narrow compass. The appellant/petitioner had appeared in Grade XII examinations, 2018 at Delhi, in the academic year 2017-18. Besides Physics, Chemistry and Maths, the appellant had also appeared in the Economics paper ...
Ravita & Ors vs.suresh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2019
$~39 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d December, 2019 RAVITA & ORS CM(M) 1714/2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. R. K. Sonkiya, Advocate. (M:9810124896) versus Through: None. SURESH CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ..... Respondent Prathiba M. Singh, J.(oral) CM APPL.51749/2019 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CM(M) 1714/2019 & CM APPL. 51748/2019 2. The present petition under Article 227 challenges the impugned order dated 23rd October, 2019 by which the ld. Trial Court has permitted the reopening of the cross-examination of DW-2 Ms. Manisha at the behest of the Plaintiff/Respondent. The case of the... Petitioner/Defendant is that Ms. Manisha was cross-examined by the Plaintiff on 8th February, 2019 and the matter was thereafter listed for final arguments. At that stage, the Plaintiff moved an application relying upon various documents to argue that the statement made by Ms. Manisha that she si...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »