Skip to content

Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Aug 24 2018

Amira Pure Foods Pvt Ltd vs.canara Bank & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-24-2018

$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8814/2018 & CM No.33880/2018 AMIRA PURE FOODS PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Harish Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr Ruchir Midha, Mr Karthik K. R. Iggu Chiitioppa, Advocates. and Mr versus CANARA BANK & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Kush Sharma, Mr Varun Sharma, Ms S. Garg and Mr Ekant Luthra, Advocates for Vijaya Bank. Mr Karan Khanna and Ms Asmita Kumar, Advocates for R-1 (Canara Bank) & R-6 (Indian Overseas Bank). Mr Rajiv Kapur and Mr Nahit Bangia, Advocates for SBI. Mr Ateev Mathur, Mr Navneet Gupta, Mr Ajay Monga, Ms Jagriti Ahuja and Mr Amol Sharma, Advocates for R-3/ICICI Mr Sumit Nagpal, Advocate for IDBI Bank/R-4. Mr Santosh Kumar Rout, Advocate or BOB and BOI. Mr Niraj Kumar, Advocate Oriental Bank of Commerce. Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2408.2018 W.P.(C) 8814/2018 Page 1 of 6 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia...


Aug 24 2018

Jacky Verma and Anr. Vs.state & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-24-2018

$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:24. 08.2018 + CRL.M.C. 4265/2018 JACKY VERMA AND ANR versus STATE & ANR ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: Mr. Simranjeet Singh, Advocate. Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for the State with SI Ravi Yadav, PS Kotla Mubarakpur. Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel, BSES RPL with Mr. Arnav Vidyarthi, Adv. for R-2 Mr. Pradeep Baisoya, Assistant Manager-Legal, BSES-RPL CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2408.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.C. 4265/2018 & CRL.M.A305692018 (stay) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.247/2017 under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, Police Station Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi, based on a settlement. CRL.M.C. 4265/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. Prayer is made for exemption from personal appearance of the petitioner No.2. It is contended that on account of some personal difficulty...


Aug 24 2018

Mamta Khurana vs.laxman Singh Solanki

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-24-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % MAMTA KHURANA RFA No.690/2018 24th August, 2018 Through: Mr. Chayan Sarkar, Advocate ..... Appellant (M. No.9911741110). Versus LAXMAN SINGH SOLANKI ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.33975/2018(exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.690/2018 and C.M. Nos.33974/2018(for condonation of delay) & 33976/2018(for ex-parte stay) 2. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 11.4.2017 by which RFA No.690/2018 Page 1 of 6 trial court has decreed the suit for recovery of moneys filed by the respondent/plaintiff/Advocate with respect to litigation fees in the suit filed in the original side of this Court titled as Saminder Singh Reen Vs. Satya Khurana, then the proceedings in...


Aug 24 2018

Azad Singh vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-24-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 24, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3024/2016 AZAD SINGH Through: Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Mr. Atul ........ Petitioner Versus Tripathi & Mr. Shashank Jha, Advocates GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Ms. Komal & Ms. Kajri Gupta, Advocates for respondent No.2-DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned order of 10th February, 2015 (Annexure P-3) rejects 1. petitioners application for allotment of alternate plot in lieu of acquired land on the ground that petitioner has failed to clarify the status in respect of property No.249-1, Second Floor, Rama Market, Munirka Village, New Delhi.2. Learned counsel for petitioner assails the impugned order by drawing attention of this Court to application form (Annexure P-8) to point out that properties, which are in abadi area are exempted and subject property was situated in abad...


Aug 23 2018

M/S G4s Security Services (I) Pvt Ltd vs.dhiraj Negi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-23-2018

* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.122/2015 23rd August, 2018 M/S G4S SECURITY SERVICES (I) PVT LTD ..... Appellant DHIRAJ NEGI Through: Mr. Deepak Sabharwal and Ms. Ritika Seth, Advocates (Mobile No.9810127048). versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Samir Sagar Vasishta and Mr. Ashutosh Jha, Advocates (Mobile No.9911588191). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 4.12.2014 by which the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff/employee against the appellant/defendant/ employer and the trial court has directed reinstatement of the respondent/plaintiff/employee besides ordering the RFA No.122/2015 Page 1 of 6 appellant/defendant/employer to pay salary from September, 2011 till August, 2012 including increm...


Aug 23 2018

Shamsi Azmi & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-23-2018

$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 2585/2005 Judgment delivered on:23. 08.2018 SHAMSI AZMI & ORS. STATE & ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mr.Satish Tamta, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Dhruv Tamta and Ms.Nisha Narayana, Adv. for petitioner Nos.1 to 3/non-applicant. Mohd.Nizam Pasha, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.Kamal Kr.Ghai, Addl. PP for the State. Ms.Nooreen Sarna, Adv. for R-2. For the Respondent(s): CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2308.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.19659/2017 1. The applicant in Crl.M.A.19659/2017 seek modification of order dated 31.05.2005. By the said order, the present petition was disposed of on a compromise between the petitioner No.1/husband and respondent No.2/wife. CRL.M.C.2585/2005 Page 1 of 4 2. The petitioner No.1 as well as respondent No.2 had entered into a settlement whereby it was agreed that a sum of Rs.12 lakhs shall be pa...


Aug 23 2018

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd vs.institute of Geo Informatics Pvt Ltd

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-23-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Judgment pronounced on:23. 08.2018 Judgment reserved on:31. 07.2018 FAO(OS)(COMM) 189/2017 INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Abhinav Vashisht, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Nishant Menon, Ms.Reeta Mishra, Ms.Priya and Mr. Shafiq Ahmed, Advs. versus INSTITUTE OF GEO INFROMATICS PVT LTD Through: Mr.Jai Savla and Mr. Rajpal Singh, Advs. ..... Respondent FAO(OS)(COMM) 197/2017 INSTITUTE OF GEO INFORMATICS (P) LTD Through: Mr.Jai Savla and Mr. Rajpal Singh, Advs. ..... Appellant versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Abhinav Vashisht, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Nishant Menon, Ms.Reeta Mishra, Ms.Priya and Mr. Shafiq Ahmed, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA JUDGMENT FAO(OS)(COMM) Nos. 189/2017 & 197/2017 Page 1 of 10 S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The parties to this proceeding entered into a contract on 14.07.2010 for execution of work of "Detailed Engineering survey, Soil survey, Cadas...


Aug 23 2018

Rajesh Yadav vs.raju Lama and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-23-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + MAC.APP. 202/2013 RAJESH YADAV Date of Decision: August 23, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate Versus RAJU LAMA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil K. Kalra and Mr. Ajay Bidhuri, Advocates for respondents No.2 Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate for respondent-Insurer + MAC.APP. 132/2014 1. BIJENDER ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil K. Kalra and Mr. Ajay Bidhuri, Advocates Versus M/S SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 23rd November, 2012 grants compensation of `2,94,728/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum to Rajesh-a fireman, aged 37 years (hereinafter referred to as the Injured) on account of grievous MAC.APPs. 202/2013 & 132/2014 Page 1 of 6 injuries suffered by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 12th May, 2011.2. In the above-captioned first appeal, enhancement of compensat...


Aug 23 2018

Smt. Urmila Vohra & Anr vs.m/s Janak Properties Pvt. Ltd. & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-23-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. 08.2018 CS(OS) 325/2017 $~OS-7 * % + SMT. URMILA VOHRA & ANR Through Mr.Sanjeev Bajaj, Adv. ..... Plaintiffs versus M/S JANAK PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Ashish Kapur, Adv. with the defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) IA Nos. 7955/2017 and 14248/2017 1.2. IA No.7955/2017 is filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC. This court had on 19.07.2017 passed an order directing that till the disposal of the application, the defendants will maintain status quo regarding the title and possession and will not create any third party interest in the suit property.3. IA No.14248/2017 has been filed by the defendants under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC seeking vacation of the interim order.4. The present suit is filed for specific performance of an Agreement dated 24.01.2013 and Addendum dated 19.07.2014 in respect of the property No.14-A/69, W.E.A., Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005 or alternativ...


Aug 23 2018

Confederation of Sadar Bazar Trader S Association (Regd.) vs.union of ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-23-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: August 23, 2018 + W.P.(C) 7330/2016, CM Nos. 30141/2016, 43250/2017 & 13195/2018 CONFEDERATION OF SADAR BAZAR TRADER S ASSOCIATION (REGD.) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Ralli, Mr. Prabhav Ralli and Ms. Nikita Khanna, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Om Prakash, Adv. with Mr. Shiv Raj Singh, CLA for Northern Railway. Mr. Ajjay Aroraa, Adv. for NDMC. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC, GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 By this order, I shall decide the writ petition and CM Nos. 30141/2016, 43250/2017 & 13195/2018 filed by the petitioner for interim directions.2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: In view of the above, it is respectfully prayed that the Honble Court may be pleased I) to issue an appropriate writ or order thereby declaring the decision / arrangement of handing over of Sadar Bazar-Qutab Ro...



AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial