Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ravi Gulati & Anr vs.today Homes & Infrastructure Pvt Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:13. 10.2017 Judgment delivered on:23. 08.2018 + W.P.(CRL) 1645/2013 and CRL.M.A. 2775/2014 & 19472/2014 ARUN SAXENA & ANR. ........ Petitioners versus TODAY HOMES & INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(CRL) 1660/2013 and CRL.M.A. 2773/2014 & 19110/2014 HARBANS LAL SARIN ........ Petitioner versus TODAY HOMES & INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(CRL) 1664/2013 and CRL.M.A. 2774/2014 RAKESH NANDA versus TODAY HOMES PVT LTD & ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(CRL) 1645/2013 & all connected matters Page 1 of 66 + W.P.(CRL) 1679/2013 and CRL.M.A. 2770/2014 & 19111/2014 UMESH BHATIA & ANR ........ Petitioners versus TODAY HOMES & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(CRL) 1666/2013 and CRL.M.A. 2738/2014 HARI OM GUPTA versus TODAY HOMES PVT LTD ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent + W.P.(CRL) 1678/2013 and CRL.M.A. 2771/2014 & 19113/2014 RAVI GULA...
Baljeet Singh vs.school Management of Guru Harkrishan Public School & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2018
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :23. d August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 6460/2015, CM APPL. 11748/2015, 16814/2015 & 16931/2018 % 1. BALJEET SINGH ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. V. Elanchezhiyan and Mr. Vivek Yadav, Advs. versus SCHOOL MANAGEMENT OF GURU HARKRISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS Through : Mr. Jasmeet Singh and ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Aditya Madaan, Advs. for R-1 to 3. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC (Civil) with Ms. Sukriti Ghai, Adv. for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner was appointed as Office Electrician by the Respondent no.1 - school on 2nd August, 2004, and was confirmed, on 23rd August, 2005. Both orders were passed by the Respondent No.1 school (hereinafter referred to as the Guru Harkrishan Public School).2. The petitioner was transferred, vide Office Order dated 3rd July, 2015 passed as per the orders of Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Respondent No.2-Society (hereinafter referred to as the Society), from th...
o.p. Faizi vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. 08.2018 $~ * + W.P.(C) 3574/2014 O.P. FAIZI Through: Mr. S.N. Bhardwaj, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Suparna Srivastava, Standing Counsel for UOI. Mr. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO RAJENDRA MENON, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL): Seeking a writ of mandamus, petitioner, a practising Advocate and an 1. elected member of the Bar Council of Delhi has filed this petition in public interest seeking the following two reliefs: Issue a writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, (i) direction or order thereby directing the... RESPONDENTS Nos.1 and 2 to take a considered and conscious decision for amending Schedule-I to the Advocates Welfare Fund Act, 2001, for upward revision and review of the quantum of payment to which Advocate Members of the Welfare Fund are entitled on cessation of practice; (ii) To ...
Arjun Gupta vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2018
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d August, 2018 + W.P.(CRL) 3378/2016 MRS SUNAINI KHALE & ORS ...... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Bhal Singh Malik, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ...... RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for the State with Mr.Piyush Singhal and Mr.Yash Kotak, Advocates Mr.Ashok Arora with Ms.Anantmala Potdar, Advocates for the complainant along with complainant in person + W.P.(CRL) 3380/2016 ARJUN GUPTA Represented by: Mr.Bhal Singh Malik, ....... Petitioner versus Advocate STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for the State with Mr.Piyush Singhal and Mr.Yash Kotak, Advocates Mr.Ashok Arora with Ms.Anantmala Potdar, Advocates for the complainant along with complainant in person CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA W.P.(CRL) 3378/2016 & 3380/3016 Page 1 of 7 MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By these petitions the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.475/2016 under Sectio...
Singapore Telecommunications Ltd vs.apm Infotech Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2018
$~CP-12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:23. 08.2018 + CO.PET. 198/2012 SINGAPORE TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Vikas Mehta, Mr.Aditya V.Singh and Mr.Apporv, Advs. versus APM INFOTECH PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr.Alok K.Agarwal, Mr.Apoorv Rastogi and Ms.Aprita, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) This petition is filed under sections 433 (e) & (f), 434 (1) (a) & (c) 1. and 439 of the Company Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking winding up of the respondent company.2. The case of the petitioner is that the parties entered into two separate agreements dated 12.12.2005 being Service Request-Cum-Agreement for Corporate Voice Delivery and Service Request-Cum-Agreement for International Private Leased Circuit. It is pleaded that the petitioner commenced to provide services as per the agreements on 10.02.2006 and monthly invoices were raised on the respondent from March, 2006 onwards. I...
Arun Saxena & Anr. Vs.today Homes & Infrastructure P. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:13. 10.2017 Judgment delivered on:23. 08.2018 + W.P.(CRL) 1645/2013 and CRL.M.A. 2775/2014 & 19472/2014 ARUN SAXENA & ANR. ........ Petitioners versus TODAY HOMES & INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(CRL) 1660/2013 and CRL.M.A. 2773/2014 & 19110/2014 HARBANS LAL SARIN ........ Petitioner versus TODAY HOMES & INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(CRL) 1664/2013 and CRL.M.A. 2774/2014 RAKESH NANDA versus TODAY HOMES PVT LTD & ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(CRL) 1645/2013 & all connected matters Page 1 of 66 + W.P.(CRL) 1679/2013 and CRL.M.A. 2770/2014 & 19111/2014 UMESH BHATIA & ANR ........ Petitioners versus TODAY HOMES & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(CRL) 1666/2013 and CRL.M.A. 2738/2014 HARI OM GUPTA versus TODAY HOMES PVT LTD ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent + W.P.(CRL) 1678/2013 and CRL.M.A. 2771/2014 & 19113/2014 RAVI GULA...
Himanshu Bajaj vs.state ( Nct of Delhi ) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2018
Judgment delivered on:23. 08.2018 $~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3545/2018 HIMANSHU BAJAJ STATE ( NCT OF DELHI ) & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: Ms. Divya Attri, Advocate. Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State. ASI Mahavir Singh, PS Rajouri Garden. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2308.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.744/2016 under Sections 354D/506/509 IPC, Police Station Rajouri Garden.2. The parties were known to each other as they had studied together. The subject FIR was registered consequent to a proposal given by the petitioner to the respondent No.2 for a marriage, which was not accepted. Subsequently, the petitioner is alleged to have misbehaved with the respondent No.2.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have CRL.M.C. 3545/2018 Page 1...
M/S Aashiana Rolling Mills Ltd vs.m/s Kamdhenu Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on :13. 08.2018 Order Pronounced on:23. 08.2018 + FAO(OS) 309/2017, C.M. Appl. No.44902/2017 M/S AASHIANA ROLLING MILLS LTD Through: Mr.Rajshekhar Rao, Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Devyani Nath, and Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advocates ..... Appellant versus M/S KAMDHENU LTD Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Senior Advocate ..... Respondent with Mr. S.K. Bansal and Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Nikhil Chawla, Advocates CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA JUDGMENT % S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. This appeal by the defendant (hereafter referred to as Aashiana), questioning the temporary ad-interim injunction issued by the learned Single Judge on 03.11.2017, in a suit by the plaintiff/respondent (hereafter Kamdhenu). Kamdhenu alleged that Aashiana had infringed its registered design in the sale of the latters FRIENDS500HD steel bars. Aashiana contended that Kamdhenu could not establish its registered design prima facie to be no...
Bijender vs.m/s Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + MAC.APP. 202/2013 RAJESH YADAV Date of Decision: August 23, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate Versus RAJU LAMA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil K. Kalra and Mr. Ajay Bidhuri, Advocates for respondents No.2 Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate for respondent-Insurer + MAC.APP. 132/2014 1. BIJENDER ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil K. Kalra and Mr. Ajay Bidhuri, Advocates Versus M/S SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 23rd November, 2012 grants compensation of `2,94,728/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum to Rajesh-a fireman, aged 37 years (hereinafter referred to as the Injured) on account of grievous MAC.APPs. 202/2013 & 132/2014 Page 1 of 6 injuries suffered by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 12th May, 2011.2. In the above-captioned first appeal, enhancement of compensat...
Pradeep Suri vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2018
$~17 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d August, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 3449/2016 and Crl. M.As 14570/2016, 15478/2017 and 3245-3246/2018 PRADEEP SURI ........ Petitioner Through: Dr. Ashutosh, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State Ms. Sunita Arora, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent had filed a petition (CC no.12/1/13) in the court of the Metropolitan Magistrate invoking its jurisdiction under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 impleading the petitioner herein as the first respondent, this in addition to various other persons, they including his brothers, their wives, sister and her husband, making allegations of they having subjected her to a series of incidents constituting domestic violence within the meaning of the expression used in the said law, she seeking reliefs, inter alia, in the nature of protection orders under Secti...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »