Delhi Court November 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vijay Kumar Arora vs.tilak Raj Chadha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2017
$~39 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on:30. h November, 2017 RC.REV. 348/2017 & CM Nos. 26920/2017, 42417/2017 VIJAY KUMAR ARORA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Brijesh Kr. Tamber, versus Advocate. TILAK RAJ CHADHA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh with Mr. Sunil Lalwani, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The matter had earlier been listed for 6th December, 2017. However, on the application (CM No.42417/2017) of the respondent, it has come up today. With the consent of learned counsel on both sides, the date of hearing is advanced and the matter is taken up for hearing.2. The petitioner herein is admittedly a tenant in the suit premises described as shop No.143, Desh Bandhu Gupta Market, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-05 as shown in colour red in the site plan annexed to the application. A case for eviction (E-213/17/12) was instituted against him by the respondent (landlord) on 28.05.2012 on the ground of bona fide need under Sect...
Satpal vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2017
$~R-71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:30. h November, 2017 + W.P. (C.) No.12160/2015 SATPAL Through Mr. Lalit Kumar Rawal and Mr. Sunil ........ Petitioner K. Goel, Advocates versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Ashutosh Ghade and Mr. Nikhil Goel, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra no.47(15-5), 48(01-00) and 49(12-19), total area 29 bighas 04 biswas having 1/12th share measuring 02 bigha 09 biswas, situated in the revenue estate of village Ghonda Gujaran Khadar, Shahdara, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) is deemed to have lapsed i...
Shri Agnesh Verma vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2017
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order Reserved On:20thNovember,2017 Order Pronounced On:29th November,2017 CRL.A.858/2017 & CRL.M.A.15881/2017 SHRI AGNESH VERMA versus .....Appellant STATE ....Respondent CRL.A.872/2017 & CRL.M.B.1633/2017 TARA CHAND versus STATE .....Appellant ....Respondent Present: Mr. Ramesh Gupta Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashwin Vaish, Advocate. Mr. Akshai Mallik, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL CRL.M.A.15881/2017 (Recall) in CRL.A.858/2017 1. An application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C.') has been filed on behalf of the State for seeking setting aside/recalling of Order dated 08.09.2017 passed by this Hon'ble Court in CRL.A.858/2017 in case FIR No.42/2002 registered under Section 13(1)(C) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the 'PC Act') and Sections 409/420/468/471/120B of the Indian Penal CRL.A.858/2017 & 872/201...
Sh. Ajab Singh vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2017
$~R63 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2017 * % + W.P.(C) 12124/2015 SH. AJAB SINGH Versus Through: Mr. Lalit K. Rawal and ........ Petitioner Mr. Sunil K. Goel, Advs. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for L&B/LAC. Mr. Pawan Mathur, Standing Counsel with Ms. Akshita Manocha, Adv. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra No.28(10-11), 28(10-3) and 80(2-8) total area measuring 23 Bighas and 2 biswas having 1/12th share measuring 01 bigha and 19 biswas and 03 biswasi situated in the revenue estate of village Ghari Mandu, Shahdara, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as subject ...
Kyk Corporation Limited & Ors. Vs.vivek Kochher & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2017
$~7 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 292/2017 & CM No.41489/2017 % Date of decision :29. h November, 2017 KYK CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS ..... Appellants Through : Mr. Aayushmaan Gauba, Adv. versus VIVEK KOCHHER & ANR ...... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Umesh Mishra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 It is submitted by ld. counsels for both the parties that such record of CS(OS)No.1305/2009 Vivek Kochher & Anr. vs. M/s KYK Corporation Limited & Ors. as is necessary for consideration of this appeal has been filed along with this appeal. With the consent of both parties, this appeal is taken up for consideration.2. We have heard ld. counsels for both the parties.3. The appellants before us, who are the defendants in FAO(OS)No.292/2017 Page 1 of 13 CS(OS)No.1305/2009, assail the order dated 12th October, 2017 (at page42) whereby the ld. Single Judge has dismissed the applications...
National Insurance Co Ltd vs.poonam Rana & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2017
$~R-586 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. h November, 2017 + MAC. APPEAL No.942/2012 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arihant Jain for Ms. Shantha versus Devi Raman, Advocate. POONAM RANA & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Through: None. ..Respondents JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant (insurer) had been impleaded as third respondent in the accident claim case (MACT No.482/10/09) instituted by first to fifth respondents (collectively, the claimants) on 06.02.2009 seeking compensation under Sections 166 and 140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, on account of death of Sarjeet Rana @ Parveen Rana in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 23.05.2008 due to negligent driving of sixth respondent (driver) of Canter bearing registration No.PB-10BN-2202 registered in the name of the ninth respondent (owner).2. On the basis of inquiry held, the Tribunal, by its judgment dated 28.05.2012, accepted the claim about the death having occurred due to ne...
Smt. Shamo vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2017
$~R62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2017 % + W.P.(C) 12123/2015 SMT. SHAMO Through: Mr. Lalit K. Rawal and ........ Petitioner Versus Mr. Sunil K. Goel, Advs. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for L&B/LAC. Ms. Akshita Manocha, Adv. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra No.28(10-11), 28(10-3) and 80(2-8) total area measuring 23 Bighas and 2 biswas having 1/12th share measuring 01 bigha and 19 biswas and 03 biswasi situated in the revenue estate of village Ghari Mandu, Shahdara, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as subject land) is deemed to have lapsed in view of Se...
Shashi Agrawal vs.vijay Kumar Agrawal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + OA No.117/2017 & IA No.3215/2017 (u/O12R-6 CPC & RESERVED ON :15. h NOVEMBER, 2017 DECIDED ON :29. h NOVEMBER , 2017 u/O7R-11 CPC) in CS(OS) 535/2016 SHASHI AGRAWAL ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.Akshay Makhija with Mr.S.Sanyam, Advocates. versus VIJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL & ORS ..... Defendants Through : Mr.Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr.Advocate, with Ms.Shalini Kapoor, Mr.Dikshant Khanna and Ms.Ruhini Dey, Advocates for D1 & D9. Mr.Mayank Mikhail Mukherjee, Advocates for D2, D3, D4, D6, D7(i) & (ii), D8(ii) & (iii). Mr.Abhishek Vikra, Advocate, for D5(c) & D8(i). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. OA No.117/2017 has been preferred by the plaintiff to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 05.07.2017 of learned Joint Registrar (Judicial) in IA No.16250/2016 whereby he declined to pass any order thereon till the disposal of the IA No.3215/2017 under Order XII Rule 6 CPC filed by defendants No.1 & 9.2. Both OA and IA were hear...
Smt. Aman vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2017
$~R60 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2017 * % + W.P.(C) 12096/2015 SMT. AMAN Versus Through: Mr. Lalit K. Rawal and ........ Petitioner Mr. Sunil K. Goel, Advs. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for L&B/LAC. Ms. Akshita Manocha, Adv. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra No.28(10-11), 28(10-3) and 80(2-8) total area measuring 23 Bighas and 2 biswas having 1/12th share measuring 01 bigha and 19 biswas and 03 biswasi situated in the revenue estate of village Ghari Mandu, Shahdara, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as subject land) is deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 2...
Brij Kishore Srivastava and Ors. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2017
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on 22nd November, 2017 Order pronounced on 29th November, 2017 + CRL. Rev. Petition 51/2015 BRIJ KISHORE SRIVASTAVA AND ORS. ..Petitioners Through : Mr. Joydip Bhattarcharya, Mr.Vishnu Langawat and Mr. Mayank Sharna. Advocates Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Ram Naresh from PS- Amar Colony. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL Crl. M. A. No.1181/2017 (Delay in re-filing) This is an application for seeking condonation of 3 days delay in refiling the petition. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in refiling the petition is condoned. Application stands disposed of. Crl. Rev. Petition 51/2015, Crl. M. A. Nos. 1180/2017 and 4265/2015 (Filing additional documents) 1. The present petition under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the petitioners assailing the order dated 26.09.2014 passed by the Metropolitan Magistr...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »