Delhi Court November 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft vs.siemens Consultancy Services Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2017
18 $~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 180/2016 SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT Through: Ms. Anju Aggarwal, Advocate. ..... Plaintiff versus ..... Defendant Through: None SIEMENS CONSULTANCY SERVICES PVT LTD % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN Date of Decision:28. h November, 2017 MANMOHAN, J (Oral): JUDGMENT1 Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, misuse of the trademark SIEMENS as a trading name, rendition of accounts etc. against the defendant. The prayer clause in the suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-"(a) a decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendant, by themselves, their servants, agents, etc. from manufacturing, selling offering for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing in products or goods and offering services under the trademark SIEMENS or any other trademark deceptively and/or confusingly similar to the trademark SIEMENS of the Plaintiffs, so as to infringe plaintiffs registered tra...
Power Finance Corporation Ltd. Vs.sushma Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2017
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5252/2014 and CM No.10428/2014 POWER FINANCE CORPORATION LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Jagdeep Kishore, Advocate. versus SUSHMA SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Sunil Bhasin, respondent no.3 in person. Mr Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing counsel for CIC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2811.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner a Public Sector Enterprise has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 15.05.2014 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter the CIC), whereby the petitioner has been directed to provide records and files notings of the Vigilance Unit held with the Power Finance Corporation Ltd. (hereafter PFC) Management and Ministry of Power in connection with the inquiry process and dismissal of respondent no.3 (the appellant before the CIC).2. Mr Jagdeep Kishore, learned counsel for the petitioner has assailed the impug...
Fakir Chand Taneja & Ors vs.sudama Gupta & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2017
Through: Mr. Vikas Jain, Advocate. ..... Appellants ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate for R2. Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate for R5. versus FAKIR CHAND TANEJA & ORS SUDAMA GUPTA & ORS + MAC.APP. 806/2012 + MAC.APP. 951/2012 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA FAKIR CHAND TANEJA & ORS versus THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. .....Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate for R8. $~R-559 & 560 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h November, 2017 JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Sunil Taneja, working as Assistant Vice President (Exports) in a private company (Maral Oversees Limited), then aged 36 years, was travelling as a passenger in a motor vehicle described as Tata Qualis, bearing registration No.MP-09V-6753 (the car), on 03.02.2007 from MAC App. No.806/2012 & 951/2012 Page 1 of 5 District Khargone, Madhya Pradesh to Shirdi in Maharashtra. At about 7.30 a.m., when the car had reached the area of Babhalephat...
Pr Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs.m/s Ravnet Solutions Pvt. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2017
$~26 & 27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28. 11.2017 ITA10622017 & CM431742017 PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2 ..... Appellant M/S RAVNET SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. versus + ITA10632017 & CM4317576/2017 ..... Respondent PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2 ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel Ms. Monika Ghai and Mr. Shyamalima Burah, Advs. : versus M/S RAVNET SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant(s) . For the Respondent(s) . CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) : ITA10621063/2017 Page 1 of 4 1. The Revenue is aggrieved by the findings of the ITAT for AY200708 which upheld the CIT(A)s decision.2. The facts of the case are that the assessee had filed its returns on 30.03.2007 declaring an income of Rs. 36,609/-. It was initially processed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The asse...
Dinesh Kumar vs.govt. Of Nctd Through the Commissioner of Police and O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + W.P.(C) 10556/2017 & C.M. No.43211/2017(Exemption) DINESH KUMAR Through Mr. Sachin Chauhan, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus GOVT OF NCTD THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel (Civil) with Mr. Sandeepan Pathak, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % ORDER2811.2017 C.M. No.43211/2017(Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 10556/2017 1. The present writ petition assails the judgment dated 07.10.2016, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. No.1018/2012, dismissing the O.A filed by the petitioner. The petitioner had approached the Tribunal by way of the aforesaid Original Application, challenging his dismissal from service vide order dated 31.10.2007 as also the order dated 16.03.2011 passed WP (C) No.10556/2017 Page 1 of 10 by the ...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax vs.b. C. Management Services Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2017
$~28 & 57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28. 11.2017 ITA10642017 & CM No.43177/2017 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus B. C. MANAGEMENT SERVICES PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent + ITA10832017 & CM No.43280/2017 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel versus B. C. MANAGEMENT SERVICES PVT. LTD. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant(s) . For the Respondent(s) CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) None. : :1. The Revenue is aggrieved by the order of the ITAT which in AY201112, accepted the assessees appeals. The questions of law urged are as follows:-"ITA1064&1083/2017 Page 1 of 6 1. Whether the exclusion of four comparables i.e. e-Clerx Pvt. Ltd., M/s ICRA Techno Analytics Ltd., M/s TCS E- Serve Ltd. and M/s Accentia Technologies Pvt. Ltd., are sustainable and not erroneous?. 2. Whethe...
Shama Sood and Anr vs.m/s Madan Lal Shyam Sunder
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2017
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h November, 2017 CM(M) 384/2016 and CM Nos.14871-14872/2016 SHAMA SOOD AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashwani Kumar Goel, Adv. with Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Adv. versus M/S MADAN LAL SHYAM SUNDER ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Madhur Sapra, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) + 1. The petitioners had instituted case (E. No.15/2014) before the Rent Controller, Central District, Delhi seeking an order of eviction on the ground under Section 14 (1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 against the first respondent impleading the said party as the sole respondent on the averments that it was the tenant in the premises in question. Since the ground on which eviction is sought requires the special procedure envisaged in Section 25-B of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 to be followed, the appropriate process was issued, in the wake of which an application seeking leave to defend was filed by the secon...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.anita Punia & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2017
$~R-576 & 577 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h November, 2017 + MAC. APPEAL No.919/2012 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate. versus ..Respondents Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for R-1 to 4. ANITA PUNIA & ORS + MAC. APPEAL No.50/2015 ANITA PUNIA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate. versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate. JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Naresh Punia, then aged 33 years, then employed as Assistant Manager with Irkon International Limited, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 05.10.2006, due to negligent driving of motor vehicle described as Tata Safari bearing registration No.JK-02S-0066, which was duly insured against third party risk with National Insurance Company Limited (the insurer) for the period in MAC App. Nos. 919/2012 & 50/2015 Page 1 of 4 question and died in the ...
Rahul vs.mcd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2017
* + % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CMI No.8/2017 CMI No.9/2017 CMI No.10/2017 Reserved on:23. d November, 2017 Pronounced on:28. h November, 2017 CMI No.8/2017 RAHUL Through: Ms. Samai Malik, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus MCD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rakesh Mittal, St. Counsel with Ms. Kamlesh Anand and Ms. Yamini Mittal, Advocates for R-1/NDMC. Ms. Sakshi Popli, Advocate for R-2/GNCTD. CMI No.9/2017 RAJENDER THANKUR ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Samai Malik, Advocate. versus MCD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rakesh Mittal, St. Counsel with Ms. Kamlesh Anand and Ms. Yamini Mittal, Advocates for R-1/NDMC. Ms. Sakshi Popli, Advocate for R-2/GNCTD. CMI No.10/2017 SURENDER SHAH ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Samai Malik, Advocate. versus CMI Nos. 8/2017, 9/2017 and 10/2017 Page 1 of 10 MCD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rakesh Mittal, St. Counsel with Ms. Kamlesh Anand and Ms. Yamini Mittal, Advocates for R-1/NDMC. Ms. Saksh...
Rani Dahiya vs.uoi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 4339/2017 Date of decision:28. h November, 2017 RANI DAHIYA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Dahiya, Adv. and versus Mr. I.S. Dahiya, Adv. UOI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for L&B/LAC Mr. P.S. Singh, Adv. with Ms. Swati Bansal, Adv. for R-3 Mr. Arjun Pant, Adv. for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.... Petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra No.118/(1-02) and 15/(0-07) total measuring 1 Bigha 9 Biswas situated in the Village Palam, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) would stand lapsed as neither possession of the subject land has been taken nor compensation paid.2. Counsel for the petitioner also draws the attention of t...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »