Delhi Court November 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
r.k. Tangri vs.national Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2017
$~R-585 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. h November, 2017 + MAC APPEAL9372012 R.K. TANGRI Through: None Versus ..... Appellant NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS. Through: Mr. Arihant ....... RESPONDENTS Jain for Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant was the claimant before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) in accident claim case (suit no.904/2009) instituted on 12.11.2007 whereby he had sought compensation for injuries sustained by him and the permanent disability suffered in the consequence on account of a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 31.08.2007 due to rash driving of a car bearing registration no.DL-3CV-8209 by the first respondent, the said car being owned by the second respondent and insured against third party risk with the third respondent for the period in question.2. The tribunal held inquiry in which the first and second respondents suffered the pro...
Deepak Kaushik vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2017
$~15. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11084/2016 and CM APPL. 43340/2016 DEEPAK KAUSHIK ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Surjeet K. Mishra, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Barkha Babbar, Advocate with Ms. Dipanjali Tyagi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % ORDER2911.2017 1. In this petition, the petitioner has laid a challenge to the order dated 10.02.2016 passed by the respondents/ITBP, accepting his resignation dated 28.01.2016. At the time of accepting his resignation, the petitioner was informed that since he had failed to serve for a period of ten years of regular employment, as per the provisions of Rule 27(1) of the ITBP Rules, 1994, his three months equivalent salary of Rs.75,756/-, was being deducted from his dues.2. We may first allude briefly to the facts of the case. On 30.12.2014, the petitioner was appointed on the rank of Head Constable (Tele- communication) in the ...
Manoj Bidhuri vs.sharun Nisha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2017
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DECIDED ON :29. h NOVEMBER, 2017 RSA2722017 MANOJ BIDHURI ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Rajveer Singh, Advocate with Mr.Raj Bidhuri, Advcoate. versus SHARUN NISHA ..... Respondent Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) CM No.43419/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. RSA2722017 & CM No.43418/2017 1. The present regular second appeal under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as CPC) read with Section 42 of CPC has been preferred to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 27.09.2017 of learned Addl. District Judge in RCA No.19/2017 whereby the order dated 04.01.2017 of learned JSCC-ASCJ-GJ (hereinafter referred to as Trial Court) in Suit No.163/2016 was confirmed. RSA2722017 Page 1 of 3 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and have examined the file. On perusal of the file, it reveal...
Chatar Singh and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 2906/2016 Date of decision:29. h November, 2017 CHATAR SINGH AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Kaushik, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Adv. Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advs. for LAC/L&B/GNCTD Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners have filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the entire acquisition proceedings with respect to 9 Bigha 03 biswas of land to the extent of their respective joint share i.e. share, comprised in Khasra Nos. 41/1(05-10), 43(03-03), 44/1(0-10), situated in the revenue estate of village Behlolpur, Tehsil Defence Colony, District South-East, New Delhi as having lapsed as the compensation pertaining to the land in question has not...
Shobha Vijender vs.chief Information Commissioner & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2017
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8289/2016 & CM342972016 SHOBHA VIJENDER ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Sanjeev Sahay, Mr Aditya Sharma, Mr Himangi Kapoor, Advocates. versus ........ RESPONDENTS CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER & ORS Through: Mr Sanjeev Narula, Ms Kaanan Gupta, Advocate for R-1. Mr Vikram Jetly, CGSC for R-2/ UOI. Ms Neelam Singh, Advocate for R-3. Mr Vikas Chopra Advocate for R- 4/NDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2911.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner who was at the material time a Councillor of Municipal Corporation of Delhi has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 13.05.2016 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter CIC). The petitioners grievance is that although she was not a party to the proceedings before the CIC, directions have been issued by the CIC against Area Counselors and their political parties, without affording them an opportunity to be heard. Th...
Sagar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 1414/2017 Order reserved on:21. t November, 2017 Order pronounced on:29th November, 2017 Singh Advocates. Through: Versus SAGAR .Petitioner Mr. Vikrant Goyal, Advocate with, Ms. Sakshi Kakkar and Mr. Ajit STATE ..Respondent 1. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL By way of the present application filed under Section 439 of the Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the Insp. Sheelawant State with Singh, P.S. Baba Haridas Nagar, New Delhi. Through: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as 'Cr.PC.'), the petitioner seeks grant of Regular Bail in FIR No.469/2014 under Sections 302/307/147/148/149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as 'IPC') registered at Police Station Baba Haridas Nagar, New Delhi. Status report is on record.2. The present case is registered on the complaint of one Bijender who stated that on 30.07.2014 at about 09:30 p.m. a quarrel had taken place between him, his family members...
Deepa Nebb vs.kuldeep Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2017
$~R-592 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. h November, 2017 + MAC APPEAL9762012 DEEPA NEBB Through: Ms. Anjana Prabhakar, ..... Appellant Advocate versus KULDEEP SINGH & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant was the claimant before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in accident claim case (MACT2311/05), filed on 09.09.2005, whereby she sought compensation under Sections 166 and 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, for the injuries and the consequent disability suffered by her, due to a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 03.05.2005, on account of negligent driving of a motor vehicle bearing registration no.HR-55BT-7896, admittedly insured against third party risk with the fourth respondent (insurer).2. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), by judgment dated 22.05.2012, awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs.1,13,980/- and directed the insurer to pa...
Ashwani vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2017
$~100. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8690/2017 1. ASHWANI Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % The petitioner had applied for the post of Navik in March, 2017 in the ORDER2911.2017 Indian Coast Guard service. He was called for his written, physical and medical examinations and was placed on the merit-list as per the results declared on 27.04.2017. After being provisionally selected for the post of Navik, the petitioner was called upon to report for his medical examination and commencement of training on 09.08.2017 at INS Chilika. The petitioner reported at INS Chilika on the fixed date. However, he was declared unfit during the medical examination on the ground that he was suffering from, Acute Otitis Media (L), a condition wherein the middle part of the ear has an inflammation, accompani...
d.p. Mahajan and Anr vs.alok Mahajan and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2017. CS(OS) 365/2017, IA No.9071/2017 (of plaintiff u/S151CPC), IA No.9072/2017 (under Order XXXIX, Rule 1 & 2 CPC), IA No.9762/2017 (of plaintiffs under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC), IA No.10846/2017 (of defendant No.3 for condonation of delay of 6 days in filing written statement), IA No.10847/2017 (of defendant No.2 for condonation of delay of 6 days in filing written statement), IA No.11979/2017 (of plaintiffs under Order XII Rule 6 CPC), IA No.13418/2017 [of defendant No.1 under Order VIII Rule 1A(3) CPC]., IA No.13419/2017 (of defendant No.1 under Order VI Rule 17 CPC) D.P. MAHAJAN AND ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. Parag P.Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Chaudhari, Mr.Pragyan P.Sharma, Ms. Mishiki Bajpai, Ms. Anandini Kumari, Mr. Rishabh Kaur and Ms. Saakshi Agrawal, Advocates for plaintiffs no.1 & 2. Neeraj Versus ALOK MAHAJAN AND ORS Through Mr. Rajesh Arya, Advocate ..... Defendants for defendants N...
Sh. Raj Singh vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2017
$~R70 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2017 * % + W.P.(C) 12159/2015 SH. RAJ SINGH Versus Through: Mr. Lalit K. Rawal and ........ Petitioner Mr. Sunil K. Goel, Advs. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for L&B/LAC. Mr. Pawan Mathur, Standing Counsel with Ms. Akshita Manocha, Adv. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra No.28(10-11), 28(10-3) and 80(2-8) total area measuring 23 Bighas and 2 biswas having 1/12th share measuring 01 bigha and 19 biswas and 03 biswasi situated in the revenue estate of village Ghari Mandu, Shahdara, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as subject l...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »