Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 56 of about 590 results (0.021 seconds)Prakash Industries Limited vs.sarve Kirti Kumar Sharma
Court: Delhi
* + % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA Nos. 815/2017 & 817/2017 Reserved on:27. h September, 2017 Pronounced on:10. h October, 2017 RFA No.815/2017 & CM APPLs. 35105-06/2017 PRAKASH INDUSTRIES LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kalasi Rai, Advocate versus SARVE KIRTI KUMAR SHARMA ..... Respondent + RFA No.817/2017 & CM APPLs. 35108-09/2017 PRAKASH INDUSTRIES LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kalasi Rai, Advocate versus SARVE KIRTI KUMAR SHARMA ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J1 These Regular First Appeals under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) are filed by the RFA Nos. 815/2017 & 817/2017 Page 1 of 10 appellant/defendant/counter-claimant impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 27.5.2017 by which the trial court has decreed the suit of the respondent/plaintiff for a sum of Rs.7,68,305/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum on account of goods (being sp...
Tag this Judgment!Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd vs.rameshwar Prasad & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-308 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:10. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.219/2011 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD .... Appellant Through: Mr. Arun Yadav, Adv. versus RAMESHWAR PRASAD & ORS. Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appeal challenges judgment dated 23.12.2010 of the motor accident claims tribunal in accident claim case (MACT No.126/2010) instituted by first and second respondents (collectively, the claimants), whereby compensation in the sum of Rs. 4,52,000/- has been awarded with interest, the liability having been fastened against the appellant insurance company, the finding returned being that Narinder Singh Kithoria @ Atul, a bachelor son of the first respondent, and junior sibling of the second respondent, had died due to negligent driving of truck bearing registration No.HR38 2137 admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant insurance company.2. The challenge by the insu...
Tag this Judgment!Reliance Industries Ltd. & Anr vs.the Estate Officer & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~30 * % + W.P.(C) 8904/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:10. h October, 2017 RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR Through Mr. Dil ........ Petitioners Jit Singh Ahluwalia, Mr.Anubhav Mehrotra, Mr.Vishrut Raj, Advocates.1. versus THE ESTATE OFFICER & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Y. Handu, Mr.Harsha Peechara, Mr.Mananjay Mishra, Advocates for respondent no.2/NDMC along with Mr. Y.V.V.J.Rajasekhar, Director- Estate, NDMC. Mr. Shiv Sapra, Advocate respondent no.3 for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioners challenged the letter dated 18th July, 2017 issued by the Estate Officer, New Delhi Municipal Council to M/s. C.J.International Hotels Ltd. whereby the Estate Officer has fixed the case under Sections 5 and 7 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 for hearing on 26th July, 2017. The petitioner is seeking setting aside of the letter dated 18th July 2017 in this writ petition. Similar prayer has bee...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India & Ors. Vs.v. K. Soni & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4931/2017 & C.M. Nos.21321-21322/2017 Date of Decision:10. h October, 2017 UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Jagjit Singh, Adv. with Ms.Rashmi Malhotra, Adv., Mr.Himanshu Kaushik, Adv. & Mr.Preet Singh, Adv. versus V.K. SONI & ORS Through: Nemo. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J1 In terms of the last order, the petitioners have filed an additional affidavit. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and proceed to dispose of the present writ petition.2. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 2nd August, 2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. No.3666/2012 & O.A. No.558/2013. The said Original Applications had been preferred by the respondents who are diploma WP (C) No.4931/2017 Page 1 of 5 holders and had been appointed as Sub Overseer Mistry (SOM) in the petitioner-Northern Rail...
Tag this Judgment!Dr R N Gupta Technical Educational Society vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12094/2015 DR R N GUPTA TECHNICAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Aseem Mehrotra, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr Roshan Lal Goel and Ms Anju Gupta, Advocates for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1010.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner - a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 - has filed the present petition impugning communications dated 01.08.2014 and 07.12.2015 (hereafter referred to as the impugned communications), whereby the petitioners request for registration under Section 12 of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 (hereafter FCRA) was rejected.2. The petitioner was established in the year 1992 with the object of promotion of education in the field of technical/professional/paramedical/ law/teaching education/polytechnic etc. It is not disputed that the petitioner is running various colleges at Delhi, Gurgaon and Agra ...
Tag this Judgment!Rajeev Gupta vs.kamal Kishore Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
$~14 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:10. h October, 2017 RC REV. 163/2015 & CM No.6421/2015 (stay) RAJEEV GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pawan Kawrani, Mr. Anil Garg & Mr. Mukesh Sachdeva, Advs. versus KAMAL KISHORE AGGARWAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. B.B. Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw & Mr. Apoorv Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the orders dated 18.02.2013 and 19.03.2015 of the Additional Rent Controller (East) at Karkardooma Courts Complex in the proceedings arising out of eviction petition (E- 28/2013) instituted by the respondent against him. By the first order, the Additional Rent Controller held that the petitioner had been served, this having been deemed on the basis of report dated 01.02.2013 of the process server indicating refusal of the process on tender by the employees of the petitioner. In the wake of such deemed service, the tribunal proceeded to grant eviction o...
Tag this Judgment!National Insurance Co Ltd vs.babita Jain & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~22 * + MAC APPEAL No.502/2016 Decided on: October 10, 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. L.K.Tyagi, Adv. ..... Appellant Versus BABITA JAIN & ORS Through: Mr. N.K.Jha, Adv. for R-1 & 5. Mr. Bharat Gupta & Mr. Vishesh Chauhan, Advs. for R-8. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1.1. Rakesh Kumar Jain, a business man, aged about 40 years, was moving on his two wheeler scooter bearing registration No.DL-4S- AN-5312 (the scooter) on 14.05.2008 from Lawrence Road to his residence in the area of Pitam Pura, New Delhi via Mahindra Park. An Alto car bearing registration No.DL-8CH-7228 (the car) is stated to have been moving ahead of it on the same road. As per the averments in the accident claim case (MACT Case No.84/2014) filed by first to fifth claimants (collectively, the claimants), the car driver suddenly stopped his vehicle and opened his door, this resulting in the scooterist losing balance and falli...
Tag this Judgment!Radico Nv Distilleries Maharashtra Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Income Tax ...
Court: Delhi
$~11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 3373/2013 & CM No.6413/2013 (stay) RADICO NV DISTILLERIES MAHARASHTRA LTD. Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kavita Jha and Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Junior Standing Counsel. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH % ORDER0910.2017 Prathiba M. Singh, J.:1. The present petition impugns the order dated 3rd April, 2013 passed by the Income Tax Settlement Commission (hereinafter referred to as the ITSC) under Section 245D (2C) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as in application nos. DL/DC53/2012-13/75-IT & DL/DC53/2012-13/76-IT for the Assessment Years (AY) 2005-06 to 2011-12. By the impugned order, the ITSC rejected the application for settlement of the pending cases filed by the... Petitioner. the...
Tag this Judgment!Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.varun Dutt & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-288 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:09. h October, 2017 + MAC.APP. 60/2011 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA VARUN DUTT & ORS. JUDGMENT (ORAL) Through ........ RESPONDENTS 1. The appellant / insurance company (insurer) was a party respondent before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) in accident claim case (suit no.1197/2004) instituted by the first respondent (claimant) leading to judgment dated 07.09.2010 whereby compensation was awarded in favour of the said claimant for injuries suffered by him in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 24.12.1998 on account of the negligent driving by the second respondent (driver) of car bearing no.DL-6CE-7806 (car) registered in the name of the third respondent (registered owner), the liability having been fastened against the insurer to pay.2. During the inquiry, the insurer had taken the plea that it was not liab...
Tag this Judgment!Usha Bhagchandani vs.the Oriental Insurance Co Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~1 & 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:9. h October, 2017 + MAC.APP. 23/2008 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P.K. Seth, Adv. versus USHA BHAGCHANDANI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rohan Thawani & Ms. Gunjan Ahuja, Advs. for R-1 with respondent No.1 in person. + MAC.APP. 1030/2015 USHA BHAGCHANDANI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rohan Thawani & Ms. Gunjan Ahuja, Advs. with appellant in person. versus THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P.K. Seth, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The issues that arise in these two connected appeals and the background facts were captured, in the order dated 11.09.2017 which reads thus:-"MAC Appeal No.23/2008 & 1030/2015 Page 1 of 12 1.Usha Bhagchandani, appellant in MAC Appeal No.1030/2015 and first respondent in MAC Appeal No.23/2008, suffered injuries in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 21.06.2006 at about 04:00 hou...
Tag this Judgment!