Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 58 of about 590 results (0.018 seconds)M/S Securitrans India Pvt Ltd vs.united India Insurance Co Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:9. h October, 2017 M/S SECURITRANS INDIA PVT LTD Through: Mr. Harish Kumar Garg, Adv. ..... Appellant + MAC.APP. 862/2015 versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sameer Nandwani, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On the claim petition ( Case No.637/2008) of the second respondent (claimant), the Tribunal by its impugned judgment dated 23.07.2015, which also governed two other cases arising out of same motor vehicular accident, awarded compensation, fastening the liability to pay initially against the first respondent (insurer) of the offending vehicle described as Tata-407 bearing registration No.DL- ILE-9789, however granting it recovery rights against the appellant which statedly was the registered owner of the said vehicle, on the ground that the third respondent (the driver) was not holding a valid or effective driving licence in its respect at the relevan...
Tag this Judgment!The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.usha Bhagchandani & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~1 & 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:9. h October, 2017 + MAC.APP. 23/2008 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P.K. Seth, Adv. versus USHA BHAGCHANDANI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rohan Thawani & Ms. Gunjan Ahuja, Advs. for R-1 with respondent No.1 in person. + MAC.APP. 1030/2015 USHA BHAGCHANDANI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rohan Thawani & Ms. Gunjan Ahuja, Advs. with appellant in person. versus THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P.K. Seth, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The issues that arise in these two connected appeals and the background facts were captured, in the order dated 11.09.2017 which reads thus:-"MAC Appeal No.23/2008 & 1030/2015 Page 1 of 12 1.Usha Bhagchandani, appellant in MAC Appeal No.1030/2015 and first respondent in MAC Appeal No.23/2008, suffered injuries in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 21.06.2006 at about 04:00 hou...
Tag this Judgment!Meer Singh vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 09, 2017 + W.P.(C) 8718/2016 & C.M. 35768/2016 AJIT SINGH + W.P.(C) 8719/2016 & C.M. 35769/2016 MEER SINGH Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav & Mr. Lalit Kumar Rawal, Advocates ........ Petitioners Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Siddharth Panda, Advocate for LAC/L & B in W.P.(C) 8718/2016 Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Advocate for LAC/L & B in W.P.(C) 8719/2016 Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Ms. Akshita Manocha & Ms. Kajri Gupta, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioners claim the relief of declaration under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (for short the New Act) that acquisition in respect of suit lands i.e. Khasra No.273, 278 & 282, total measuring 10 bighas and 06 biswas (out of which petitioners claim share to the extent...
Tag this Judgment!Tata Sons Limited vs.sunil Kumar Jangra & Others
Court: Delhi
$~7 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:09. 10.2017 CS(OS) 2297/2011 TATA SONS LIMITED versus SUNIL KUMAR JANGRA & OTHERS Advocates who appeared in this case: ..... Plaintiff ..... Defendants For the Plaintiff : Mr Pravin Anand, Mr Achathan Sreekumar and Mr Karan Kamra For the Defendants : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0910.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CS(OS) 2297/2011 & IA No.14935/2011(O.XXXIX R.1 & 2 CPC) 1. Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that the Registration Certificates for use in legal proceedings have been issued by the Trade Mark Registry and the same have been filed on 25.10.2016.2. Since the Certificates are issued by the Trade Mark Registry in terms of Section 137 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, certified copies of ========================================================== CS(OS) 2297/2011 Page 1 of 7 the same are produced in Court and tendered in evidence. The same are exhibited and marked Exhibit P-1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Balwan Singh vs.nupur Sharma & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~R-295 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:9. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL962011 BALWAN SINGH ..... Appellants Through: None versus NUPUR SHARMA & ORS . ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Pankaj Seth, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant is the registered owner of Maruti Van bearing registration No.DL-9C D8117which was being driven on the relevant date and time by the second respondent ( the driver) when it came to be involved in a motor vehicle accident in front of Apollo Hospital within the territorial jurisdiction of PS Sarita Vihar on 08.12.2005 resulting in injuries being suffered by the first respondent (claimant), giving rise to cause of action in her favour to seek compensation by instituting claim petition (Suit No.454/08) on 02.06.2006. The van was admittedly insured against third party risk with the third respondent (insurer). The Tribunal held inquiry and, on the basis of evidence led, upheld the case of the claimant for c...
Tag this Judgment!Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.krishna Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-292 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:9. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.80/2011 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Adv. versus KRISHNA DEVI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On the accident claim case (MACT No.351/04/08) of first to fourth respondents (collectively, the claimants) instituted on 03.02.2004, the motor accident claims tribunal, by its judgment dated 11.10.2010, awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs. 7,67,180/- in their favour on account of death of Balbir in motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 13.10.2003 involving negligent driving of tractor bearing registration No.HR185534 by the fifth respondent, the vehicle being registered in the name of sixth respondent (the insured). The insurer had raised the plea that as the deceased was sitting in the trolley attached to the tractor it could not have been burdened with the liability. This p...
Tag this Judgment!Mukesh Kumar vs.harish Chandra & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~R-290 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:9. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.66/2011 MUKESH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: None. versus HARISH CHANDRA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P.K. Seth, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant, then serving as a Sub-Inspector in Delhi Police, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 02.05.2004. On his accident claim case (MACT No.239/2008) instituted on 17.09.2004, the tribunal held inquiry and, by judgment dated 12.07.2010, awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs. 1,32,000/-, fastening the liability on the second respondent (insurer), it having admittedly issued insurance policy covering third party risk in respect of the offending vehicle described as mini truck make DCM Toyota bearing registration No.DL1A7571of the first respondent (driver-cum-owner), the amount of compensation awarded by the tribunal having been calculated thus:-"MAC Appeal No...
Tag this Judgment!Tulsi Dass Ahuja (Since Deceased) Through His Lrs & Anr. Vs.chattar Si ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.239/2017 + % TULSI DASS AHUJA (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS & ANR. ..... Appellants 9th October, 2017 Through: Mr. D.K. Rustagi, Advocate with Mr. Mayank Rustagi, Advocate and Mr. Kapil Gulati, Advocate. versus CHATTAR SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.36056/2017 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RSA No.239/2017 and C.M. No.36055/2017 (stay) 2. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the legal heirs of the one defendant and by the second defendant in the suit i.e effectively the appeal is filed by the two defendants in the suit. The RSA No.239/2017 Page 1 of 17 appellants/defendants impugn the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 16.4.2013 and the F...
Tag this Judgment!Lalit Mohan & Ors. Vs.bhuwan Mohan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI9h October, 2017 CS(OS) 73/2017 LALIT MOHAN & ORS. Represented by: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhimanyu Mahajan, Ms. Anubha Goel, Advs. ..... Plaintiff versus BHUWAN MOHAN & ORS. ..... Defendant Represented by: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv. for D-1, 3 to 6, & 9. Mr. Samar Bansal, Mr. Balaji Subramanian, Advs. for D-2. Mr. Amit Agrawal, Adv. for D-10. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiffs Lalit Mohan, Kusum Krishna and Anuradha Krishna under Section 92 CPC with the following prayers: a) Pass a decree under Section 92(1)(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 removing the defendant Nos. 1&2 as Members of the defendant No.9/ Trust; b) Pass a decree under Section 92(1)(h) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 setting aside the letter dated 9.9.2016 CS(OS) 73/2017 Page 1 of 13 issued by defendant No.9 to the Delhi University in respect of...
Tag this Judgment!Sardar Kamaljeet Singh vs.the State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi ) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1729/2017 SARDAR KAMALJEET SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Shikha Shah, Advocate along with petitioner in person. versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ) & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Kamna Vohra, ASC for State with SI Santosh Kumar, PS Tilak Nagar, Delhi. Mr.Gurbaksh Singh, Advocate along with Mr.Anup Verma, Advocate for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % ORDER0910.2017 1. Respondent No.2 appears in person and accepts notice. She is accompanied by her father. She is being represented by her counsel. She is duly identified by IO SI Santosh Kumar.2. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.0565/2016, registered against him on 30.06.2016 with Police Station Tilak Nagar, District West, Delh...
Tag this Judgment!