Delhi Court May 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 30 of about 438 results (0.020 seconds)Ramakant Mishra and Others Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Through Its M ...
Court: National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Dalip Singh, Judicial Member: 1. On the previous date it had been brought to our notice that the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan dated 27.11.2012 which was taken into consideration by this Tribunal while passing the earlier order and on which certain clarifications were sought from the Respondents, is a subject matter of appeal before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. 2. The Learned Counsel for the parties submitted that the aforesaid appeal which was fixed in the month of April, 2014 has since been adjourned for taking up after the ensuing summer vacation by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The Learned Counsel for the parties submit that since the issues raised in this application are similar to the one which is being dealt with by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on the matter arising out of the judgement of Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan, the present application may be disposed of with the directions that the parties shall abide by the decision given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on the...
Tag this Judgment!Kailash Chand Meena and Others Vs. State of Rajasthan Through the Secr ...
Court: National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Dalip Singh, Judicial Member: 1. This Original Application was originally filed in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) as a writ petition before the Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan by the three Applicants jointly which was registered as S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 631/2005. The Hon'ble High Court vide its order dated 23 rd September, 2013 transferred the Writ Petition to the NGT, Central Zone Bench at Bhopal and consequently it came to be registered as O.A. No. 122/2013. After receipt of the aforesaid matter before this Tribunal, notices were ordered to be issued on 5th December, 2013 to the parties. Pursuant to the notices, the Applicant as well as the Respondents have put in their appearance. Vide order dated 29th January, 2014 it was ordered that the interim order passed by the Hon'ble High Court on the order of the Respondent No. 3 SDO, Sikrai, District Dausa passed on 29th July, 2003 Annexure-4 to the petition in Case No. 105/2002 was ordered to be stayed which was continued by this...
Tag this Judgment!Sukhjeet Singhahulwalia, Betul (M.P.) Vs. Gurudwara Gurunanak Mandir T ...
Court: National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Dalip Singh, Judicial Member 1. As per our order dtd. 02.05.2014 an amount of Rs. 21,000/- has been deposited by the Respondent No. 1 with the CMO of the Nagar Palika, Betul, Respondent No. 2 for carrying out plantation and protection of the trees by Respondent No. 1 and Respondent no. 2 jointly. 2. Today, Shri Sachin K. Verma, Learned Counsel has filed Misc. Application No. 225/2014 for taking on record the documents including photostat copy of the cheque bearing no.004370 drawn on Bank of Mahrashtra, Main Road Betul Gunj, Betul, Gokul Trade Centre. Shri Sachin K. Verma, Learned Counsel has also indicated in the Misc. Application filed today that the Municipal Council, Betul has resolved to sanction a sum of Rs. 20,000/- in public interest for beautification of the area near the Gurudwara and cleaning up of Hathi Nalah for which estimates have also been filed along with the said Misc. Application as Annexure R-2/3 along with site plan for executing the aforesaid planting and developme...
Tag this Judgment!Jane Norman Limited Vs. Jane Norman Retail Pvt Ltd and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~20. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1120/2012 % Judgment dated 15.05.2014 JANE NORMAN LIMITED Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pritish Kapur, Mr. Sahil Yadav and Ms. Sukriti, Advs. versus JANE NORMAN RETAIL PVT LTD & ORS. Through : None .....Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining trade mark and copyright infringement, passing off, dilution, acts of unfair competition, damages/rendition of accounts, freezing of assets, delivery up etc.2. Summons in the suit and notice in the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 were issued on 24.04.2012 when an ex parte ad interim injunction was granted in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants thereby restraining them from using the trade mark JANE NORMAN in relation to goods which fall in class 14,18, 25 and 35 including clothing, readymade garments, handbags, footwear and other accessories in which the plai...
Tag this Judgment!Mera Baba Real Estate Pvt Ltd Vs. Sandeep Goel and anr
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA No.8/2013 Decided on:15. 05.2014 IN THE MATTER OF : MERA BABA REAL ESTATE PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikramjit Saini, Advocate with Mr. Harish Luthra, Managing Director of the appellant in person. versus SANDEEP GOEL AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Narinder Kumar, Advocate with respondent No.1 in person. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. On 27.03.2014, as the Managing Director of the appellant/company was not present despite specific directions for his presence, the matter was adjourned on imposition of costs of `10,000/- on the appellant and with directions that he would remain present on the next date,, i.e., 15.5.2014. The said costs have been paid to the counsel for the respondents today. However, when the matter was taken up in the morning session, the Managing Director of the appellant was absent. The explanation offered by the counsel for the appellant for his absence was that he is indispo...
Tag this Judgment!H.C. Sharma Vs. Ndmc and anr.
Court: Delhi
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6828/2010 Date of decision:15. h May, 2014 % H.C. SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Shankar Raju and Mr.Nilansh Gaur, Advocates. versus NDMC AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: None for R-1. Mr.R.V.Sinha, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The writ petitioner challenges the order dated 30th April, 2010 dismissing Transfer Application no.188/2009 with Original Application no.1343/2009 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench. The petitioner had filed the writ petition No.3917/1996 before this court seeking benefit under The Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 being extended for promotion to the post of Executive Engineer, a Group A post with the New Delhi Municipal Corporation 2. The writ petition was transferred for consideration to the Central Administrative Tribun...
Tag this Judgment!State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur Vs. S.K.Talwar
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on March 19, 2014 Judgment Delivered on May 13, 2014 + W.P.(C) 5821/2002 STATE BANK OF BIKANER & JAIPUR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Anil Kumar Sangal, Advocate with Mr.Siddharth Sangal, Advocate versus S.K.TALWAR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Atul Nagarajan, Advocate with Mr.Sushant Kumar Thakur and Mr.Sujeet Singh Malhotra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the award dated May 29, 2002 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (Tribunal in short) in I.D No.148/1990, whereby the Tribunal has set aside the order of the Disciplinary Authority dated December 16, 1988, dismissing the respondent from service and as upheld by the Appellate Authority vide its order dated May 27, 1989 and directed the reinstatement of the respondent with all consequential benefits including continuity in service and back wages minus Rs.1.48 Lakhs ...
Tag this Judgment!Dilbagh Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. Appeal No.83/2014 Reserved on:29. h April, 2014 Date of Decision:13. h May, 2014 % DILBAGH SINGH Through ....Appellant Mr. V. Madhukar, Mr. Sachin Dev Sharma and Ms. Anita Cowshish, Advocates. Versus STATE Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J.The appellant stands convicted for murder of Karamjeet under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short) by the impugned judgment dated 8th June, 2012 in Sessions Case No.9/11 arising out of FIR No.339/2010, P.S. K.N.K. Marg. By order on sentence dated 27th July, 2012, the appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life, pay fine of Rs.10,000/-, and in default/failure to pay fine undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. Benefit of Section 428 Cr.P.C. has been granted.2. The impugned judgment/prosecution case primarily relies upon extra judicial confession made by the a...
Tag this Judgment!Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Anita Gupta and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:13th May, 2014 % + MAC.APP. No.366 /2010 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Advocate. Versus ANITA GUPTA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Ravindra Narayan, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.+ MAC.APP. No.366 /2010 1. Vide the present appeal, the appellant/Insurance Company has assailed the award dated 03.04.2010, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for an amount of Rs.38,75,000/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization of the amount.2. Mr. L.K.Tyagi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted that the compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal is excessive, exorbitant and the same is not in accordance with the settled principles of assessment of compensation laid down by the Apex Court and this Court.3. He further ...
Tag this Judgment!Sat Parkash Yadav Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. h March, 2014 Pronounced on:13. h May, 2014 + CRL. A. 282/1998 SAT PARKASH YADAV Through ..... Appellant Mr. S.P. Singh Chaudhary, Advocate. Versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G.P. MITTAL, J.1. Appellant Sat Parkash Yadav impugns the judgment dated 07.03.1998 and the order on sentence dated 10.03.1998 whereby he was convicted for the offences punishable under Section 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC for short) for committing murder of his daughter Ruchi, aged about eight years and for destruction of the evidence with the intention of screening himself from the legal punishment. He was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- or in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. He was f...
Tag this Judgment!