Delhi Court May 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 31 of about 438 results (0.039 seconds)Tata Aig General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Kajal and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~31-34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:13. h May, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 443/2014 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.A.K.Soni for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate. Versus RELA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: None. AND + MAC.APP. 444/2014 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.A.K.Soni for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate. Versus MOHIT & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: None. AND + MAC.APP. 445/2014 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.A.K.Soni for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate. Versus KAJAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: None. AND + MAC.APP. 446/2014 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.A.K.Soni for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate. Versus RASHMI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CM Nos.8371/2014 in MAC.APP. 443/2014, 8373/2014 in M...
Tag this Judgment!Munna Pandit Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. Appeal No.100/2014 Reserved on:15. h April, 2014 Date of Decision:13. h May, 2014 % Munna Pandit Through ....Appellant Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Advocate. Versus State Through Respondent Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J.By the impugned judgment dated 1st October, 2013, Munna Pandit has been convicted under Section 302 Indian Penal Code (IPC for short) for the murder of his brother Megh Nath Pandit on 3rd May, 2011. By order of sentence dated 7th October, 2013, he has been sentenced to life imprisonment but no fine has been imposed.2. The impugned judgment and the prosecution primarily rely upon the testimonies of Lal Babu Shah (PW6) and Mukesh (PW7) who were residing with the appellant Munna Pandit and the deceased Megh Nath Pandit at factory No.193, Sector 3, DSIDC Bawana, Delhi. Lal Babu Shah (PW6) and Mukesh (PW7) are not the eye witnesses and do not claim that...
Tag this Judgment!Pradeep Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 172/2012 Reserved on:02. d April, 2014 Decided on:13. h May, 2014 % Pradeep Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjay Kumar and Ms. Parul Sharma, Advs. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kumar Singh, APP for the State. versus State Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By this appeal, the Appellant challenges the judgment dated 15 th December, 2011 convicting the Appellant for offence under Sections 363/376/511 IPC and the order on sentence dated 19th December, 2011 directing him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 5 years and fine of Rs.10,000/- for offence under Sections 376/511 IPC and Rigorous Imprisonment for 3 years and fine of Rs.10,000/- for offence under Section 363 IPC.2. Learned counsel for the Appellant contends that the Appellant has been falsely implicated. Though the prosecutrix was 8 years old, however, her medical examination does not support the case of the prosecution. PW13 Dr. Preeti has stated that there...
Tag this Judgment!Angad Kumar Vs. Gopal Bahadur and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:13. h May, 2014 + MAC.APP. 40/2012 ANGAD KUMAR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate. versus GOPAL BAHADUR & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.: (ORAL) 1. The present appeal is directed against the impugned award dated 05.09.2011 whereby learned Tribunal has awarded compensation for an amount of Rs.7,37,563/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition i.e. 01.05.2010 till realisation of the award amount.2. Vide the present appeal, the appellant is seeking enhancement of compensation as noted above.3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that in the accident the appellant received injury with 80% disability and the learned Tribunal has assessed the disability as 60%. Age of the injured on the date of accident was 19 years, despite, the learned Tribunal has n...
Tag this Judgment!Triumphant Institute of Management Education Pvt. Vs. Aspiring Mind As ...
Court: Delhi
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.S. (OS) No.1058 of 2014 Decided on :13. h May, 2014 TRIUMPHANT INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION PVT. LTD. Plaintiffs Through: Mrs. Pratibha M. Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tejveer Bhatia, Advocate. Versus ASPIRING MIND ASSESSMENT PVT. LTD. & ORS. Defendants Through: Mr. Saikrishan Rajagopal, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.8156/2014 (under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC) & I.A No.6786/2014 (under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC) 1. By this application bearing No.8156/2014 filed under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC, the defendants are seeking vacation of ex parte ad interim injunction granted by this court in favour of the plaintiff on 16.4.2014.2. The question to be decided by this order is as to whether the ex parte ad interim injunction order granted in favour of the plaintiff deserves to be continued or not once the defendant puts in appearance and makes an allegation that the plaintiff is guilty of suppression of material f...
Tag this Judgment!Anita Gupta Vs. Kamlesh and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:13th May, 2014 % + MAC.APP. No.504 /2010 ANITA GUPTA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr. Ravindra Narayan, Advocate. Versus KAMLESH & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.L.K.Tyagi Advocate for Respondent No.3/Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the present appeal, the appellant/injured has assailed the award dated 03.04.2010, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation as under:Medical expenses : Proposed future medical expenses : Domestic help/attendant charges : Future medication, physiotherapy, conveyance, domestic help/attendant charges : Rs. 5,00,000/Rs. 3,00,000/Rs. 1,00,000/- Conveyance, boarding and lodging charges : Rs. 1,00,000/- Special diet Future loss of income Mental agony, pain and sufferings Rs. 1,00,000/Rs. 20,25,000/Rs. 1,50,000/- MAC.Appeal No.504/2010 : : : Loss of amenities of life Depression and mental state Matrimonial discomfort : : : R...
Tag this Judgment!Tata Aig General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Rela and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~31-34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:13. h May, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 443/2014 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.A.K.Soni for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate. Versus RELA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: None. AND + MAC.APP. 444/2014 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.A.K.Soni for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate. Versus MOHIT & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: None. AND + MAC.APP. 445/2014 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.A.K.Soni for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate. Versus KAJAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: None. AND + MAC.APP. 446/2014 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.A.K.Soni for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate. Versus RASHMI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CM Nos.8371/2014 in MAC.APP. 443/2014, 8373/2014 in M...
Tag this Judgment!Balwan Singh and ors. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.480/1999 Reserved on :16. h April, 2014 Date of Decision:13. h May, 2014 % BALWAN SINGH AND ORS. Through ..... Appellant Mr. Rajinder Kumar, Advocate. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP with SI Satish Kumar, PS Alipur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J: By the impugned judgment dated 7th September, 1999, Balwan Singh, his brother Sahib Singh and his relative Amardeep Singh stand convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for having committed murder of Karan Singh on 29th March, 1989 at about 10.30 a.m. By order on sentence dated 8 th September, 1999, they have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.500/- each. In default of payment, they have to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a further period of three months. Benefit of Section 428 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973...
Tag this Judgment!Tata Aig General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Rashmi and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~31-34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:13. h May, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 443/2014 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.A.K.Soni for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate. Versus RELA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: None. AND + MAC.APP. 444/2014 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.A.K.Soni for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate. Versus MOHIT & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: None. AND + MAC.APP. 445/2014 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.A.K.Soni for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate. Versus KAJAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: None. AND + MAC.APP. 446/2014 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.A.K.Soni for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate. Versus RASHMI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CM Nos.8371/2014 in MAC.APP. 443/2014, 8373/2014 in M...
Tag this Judgment!Tata Aig General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Mohit and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~31-34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:13. h May, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 443/2014 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.A.K.Soni for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate. Versus RELA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: None. AND + MAC.APP. 444/2014 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.A.K.Soni for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate. Versus MOHIT & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: None. AND + MAC.APP. 445/2014 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.A.K.Soni for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate. Versus KAJAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: None. AND + MAC.APP. 446/2014 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.A.K.Soni for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate. Versus RASHMI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CM Nos.8371/2014 in MAC.APP. 443/2014, 8373/2014 in M...
Tag this Judgment!