Delhi Court May 2014 Judgments
Satbir Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2014
$~15 to 17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h May, 2014 % + W.P.(C) 1798/2014 & CM No.3768/2014 SATBIR SINGH Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through : + ..... Respondents Mr. Jatan Singh, CGSC with Mr. Saqib Qureshi, Advs. W.P.(C) 1799/2014 & CM No.3769/2014 RAVINDER KUMAR Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through : + ..... Respondents Mr. Jatan Singh, CGSC with Mr. Saqib Qureshi, Advs. W.P.(C) 1919/2014 & CM No.4006/2014 S.N. LABH Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through : W.P.(C)Nos.1798/2014, 1799/2014 & 1919/2014 ..... Respondents Mr. Jatan Singh, CGSC with Mr. Saqib Qureshi, Advs. page 1 of 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. Pursuant to the order dated 4th April, 2014, the respondents have filed an affi...
Tag this Judgment!Ravinder Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2014
$~15 to 17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h May, 2014 % + W.P.(C) 1798/2014 & CM No.3768/2014 SATBIR SINGH Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through : + ..... Respondents Mr. Jatan Singh, CGSC with Mr. Saqib Qureshi, Advs. W.P.(C) 1799/2014 & CM No.3769/2014 RAVINDER KUMAR Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through : + ..... Respondents Mr. Jatan Singh, CGSC with Mr. Saqib Qureshi, Advs. W.P.(C) 1919/2014 & CM No.4006/2014 S.N. LABH Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through : W.P.(C)Nos.1798/2014, 1799/2014 & 1919/2014 ..... Respondents Mr. Jatan Singh, CGSC with Mr. Saqib Qureshi, Advs. page 1 of 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. Pursuant to the order dated 4th April, 2014, the respondents have filed an affi...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Ram Chand Rupana Vs. State Bank of Patiala
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2014
$~ 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1565/2009 % Judgment dated 16.05.2014 SHRI RAM CHAND RUPANA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.S.S. Jain, Advocate versus STATE BANK OF PATIALA ..... Defendant Through: Mr.I.S. Alag and Mr.J.S. Lamba, Adv CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) I.A. 4316/2010 1. This is an application filed by the defendant under order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint.2. The necessary facts of the case as per the plaint are that the plaintiff. The plaintiff was kept out of service for around 30 years and at the time of filing of the suit he was a senior citizen of 70 years of age.3. The matter was referred to the CBI for investigation. A case was registered and charges were framed for causing wrongful loss to the defendant of Rs.91,59,680/-. It is the case of the plaintiff that without conducting any enquiry the plaintiff was placed under suspension on 5.7.1979; and the action initiated by the defendant is against the servic...
Tag this Judgment!Mukesh Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: May 16, 2014 + CRL.A. 601/1999 MUKESH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Krishan Kumar & Ms. Sunita Arora, Advocates with appellant in person Versus THE STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP for the State with SI Parmendra Kumar, Police Station Paharganj, New Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J1 By this appeal filed under section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.), the appellant seeks to challenge the impugned judgment dated 15.7.1999 and order on sentence dated 16.7.1999 passed by the learned ASJ, whereby the appellant is convicted for committing an offence punishable under Section 302/498-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC). He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life, Crl.A. No.601/1999 together with Page 1 of 35 payment of fine of Rs.1,000/- and in def...
Tag this Judgment!S.N. Labh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2014
$~15 to 17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h May, 2014 % + W.P.(C) 1798/2014 & CM No.3768/2014 SATBIR SINGH Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through : + ..... Respondents Mr. Jatan Singh, CGSC with Mr. Saqib Qureshi, Advs. W.P.(C) 1799/2014 & CM No.3769/2014 RAVINDER KUMAR Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through : + ..... Respondents Mr. Jatan Singh, CGSC with Mr. Saqib Qureshi, Advs. W.P.(C) 1919/2014 & CM No.4006/2014 S.N. LABH Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through : W.P.(C)Nos.1798/2014, 1799/2014 & 1919/2014 ..... Respondents Mr. Jatan Singh, CGSC with Mr. Saqib Qureshi, Advs. page 1 of 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. Pursuant to the order dated 4th April, 2014, the respondents have filed an affi...
Tag this Judgment!Radha Nigam Vs. Manas Bansal and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2014
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:15th May, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 628/2011 RADHA NIGAM Represented by: Versus MANAS BANSAL & ORS Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Ruchi Kapoor, Advocate. ..... Respondents Mr.Satya Narayan, Advocate Respondent No.2. Mr.K.L. Nandwani, Advocate for Respondent No.3/Insurance Company. Ms.Monika for Mr.S.N. Prashar, Advocate for Respondent No.5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the present appeal, the appellant/claimant has assailed the award dated 31.03.2011, whereby the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, (for short MV Act) was dismissed by the learned Tribunal.2. The facts of this case are that on 14.03.2003, deceased Manish Nigam, i.e., son of the appellant alongwith three other friends were returning from Hayat Regency Hotel after attending the birthday party of their friend in a Baleno Car bearing No.DL9B1071driven by one of the friend of the decease...
Tag this Judgment!Parvez Alias Bablu Chikna Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :08. 05.2014 Judgment delivered on :15.05.2014 + CRL.A.188/2006 PARVEZ alias BABLU CHIKNA ..... Appellant Through Mr.Abhay Kumar, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr.Varun Goswami, APP. + CRL.A.195/2006 ARUN GUPTA alias MONU ..... Appellant Through Mr.A.S.Rajput, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr.Varun Goswami, APP. + CRL.A.196/2006 FURKAN alias SONU ..... Appellant Through Mr.A.S.Rajput, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr.Varun Goswami, APP. + CRL.A.227/2006 DILAWAR alias DILSHAD ..... Appellant Through Mr.A.S.Rajput, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr.Varun Goswami, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 There are four appellants before this Court i.e. Parvez @ Bablu Chikna, Furkan @ Sonu, Arun Gupta @ Sonu & Dilawar @ Dilshad. They are aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 18.02.2006 and 20.02.2006 respe...
Tag this Judgment!Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shri Balwan Singh and anr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO No.66/2012 and C.M. No.2337/2012 (stay) 15th May, 2014 % BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajat Brar, Advocate. Versus SHRI BALWAN SINGH AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Pratima N. Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Hari Kishan, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal is filed under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1930 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the judgment of the Commissioner dated 30.11.2011 by which the Commissioner has awarded the compensation to the respondent no.1 herein on account of an accident arising out of and in the course of employment on 5.5.2008.2. The facts of the case are that the respondent no.1 was a driver employed with the respondent no.2 herein/employer. Respondent no.1 was employed as a driver on a vehicle bearing N...
Tag this Judgment!Balwan Singh and ors. Vs. Dda and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: April 30, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: May 15, 2014 % + LPA200611/2006 BALWAN SINGH & ORS. Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sumit Bansal, Advocate with Mr.Ateev Mathur and Ms.Richa Oberoi, Advocates versus DDA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate for R-2 & R-3 Mr.Mahendra Rana, Advocate for R-8 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Issue concerns the interpretation of the proviso to Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation & Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, as applicable in Delhi. Hereinafter it would be referred to as The Act. The Section reads as under:42. Power of Chief Commissioner to call for proceedings The Chief Commissioner may at any time for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the legality or propriety of any order passed, scheme prepared or confirmed or repartition made by any officer under this Ac...
Tag this Judgment!Bharat Kumar Vs. Ashok Sahdev and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2014
$~3 & 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: May 15, 2014 + FAO(OS) 465/2013 BHARAT KUMAR & ORS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sunil Magon, Advocate versus STATE & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.Peeyoosh Kalra, Mr.Rakesh Kumar Garg and Mr.Anirban Sen, Advocates RFA(OS) 123/2013 BHARAT KUMAR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sunil Magon, Advocate versus ASHOK SAHDEV AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.Peeyoosh Kalra, Mr.Rakesh Kumar Garg and Mr.Anirban Sen, Advocates for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(ORAL) Caveat No.839/2013 in RFA (OS) No.123/2013 Since counsel as above appears for the caveator, the caveat is discharged. CM No.14953/2013 in RFA (OS) No.123/2013 Allowed subject to just exceptions. FAO (OS) No.465/2013 & RFA (OS) No.123/2013 1. The appellant Bharat Kumar has been...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »