Delhi Court April 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 31 of about 432 results (0.022 seconds)M/S Indo Arya Logistics Vs. Central Warehousing Corporation
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: April 15, 2014 Arb. P. No.377/2012 & I.A. No.21982/2012 M/S INDO ARYA LOGISTICS ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Asheesh Jain, Adv. versus CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through Mr.K.K.Tyagi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.2. Brief facts for the purpose of adjudication of the petition are that the parties to the petition, i.e. the petitioner and respondent entered into an agreement dated 20th December, 2006 which contains the arbitration clause. The same reads as under:16. ARBITRATION:- Any difference or dispute what-soever arising between the parties out of or relating to the construction, meaning, scope, operation or effect of thi...
Tag this Judgment!S.K.Gupta and ors. Vs. Mcd and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : April 01, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : April 04, 2014 + LPA7792010 S.K.GUPTA & ORS. Represented by: .....Appellants Mr.Ravinder Sethi, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Advocate versus MCD & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Ramakant Tripathi, Advocate for Ms.Amita Gupta, Advocate for R-1 Mr.Manoj Khanna, Advocate for R-8 LPA1132011 SARVAPRIYA COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD. .....Appellant Represented by: Mr.Rajeshwer Kumar Gupta, Advocate with Ms.Sumati Sharma, Advocate versus MCD & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Ramakant Tripathi, Advocate for Ms.Amita Gupta, Advocate for R-1 Mr.Manoj Khanna, Advocate for R-8 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. acres. 14% of 30.44 acres comes to 4.26 acres. 5% of 4.26 acres is 0.213 4.26 0.213 = 4.047. 2.583 + 1.373 = 3.956. 4.047 3.956 = 0.091 acres. This equals to around 450 square y...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India and ors. Vs. Ex.Lt.R.P.Yadav
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: April 01, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: April 04, 2014 + LPA4682011 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.Anil Gautam, Advocate versus EX.LT.R.L.YADAV Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Sukhjinder Singh, Advocate LPA6302011 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.Anil Gautam, Advocate versus EX.LT.R.P.YADAV Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Sukhjinder Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Respondent Lt.R.L.Yadav joined the Indian Navy as a Sailor (Sea-I) on October 19, 1963. He competed at an open selection for being granted a Short Service Commission and was successful. On March 09, 1970 he was granted Short Service Commission. The post was that of an Officer-SubLieutenant.2. Concededly the ranks which can be held as a Sailor are : - (i) Sea-I, (ii) Seaman, (iii) Petty Officer, (iv) Chief Petty Officer, an...
Tag this Judgment!Vinod Chaudhary Vs. Rattan Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:4. h April, 2014 % + MAC.APP. No.901/2012 VINOD CHAUDHARY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.V.K. Malik, Mr. Rahul Raj Malik & Mr. Rajeev Chauhan, Advocates. Versus RATTAN SINGH & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Mr. Sanjeet Ranjan and Mr. Mukul Thakur, Advocates for Respondent No.3/Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. dated The present appeal is preferred against the impugned award 19.04.2012, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.1,91,663/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization of the amount.2. Vide the instant appeal, the appellant is seeking enhancement of the aforementioned compensation amount.3. Brief facts of the case are that on 28.02.1998, the appellant was returning to his house from his workplace in Gurgaon on his two wheeler Scooter No.DII-932...
Tag this Judgment!Panchshila Hospitality Ventures Ltd. Vs. Ranjit Charles Singh (Since D ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment pronounced on: April 04, 2014 CM(M) No.1161/2012 & C.M. No.18218/2012 (for stay) N.J.KANWAR Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Arun Khosla, Adv. with Ms.Shreeanka Kakkar, Adv. versus RANJIT CHARLES SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Chetan Chawla, Adv. for R-2. AND + CM(M) No.1182/2012 & C.M. No.18468/2012 (for stay) PANCHSHILA HOSPITALITY VENTURES LTD. ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Arun Khosla, Adv. with Ms.Shreeanka Kakkar, Adv. versus RANJIT CHARLES SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Chetan Chawla, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The abovementioned petitions have been filed by two petitioners who are the plaintiffs in the learned Trial Court. In the petitions, both have challenged the orders dated 26th September, 2012 whereby their applications under Order 22 Rule 4(4) of the Code of Civ...
Tag this Judgment!N.J. Kanwar Vs. Ranjit Charles Singh (Since Deceased) and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment pronounced on: April 04, 2014 CM(M) No.1161/2012 & C.M. No.18218/2012 (for stay) N.J.KANWAR Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Arun Khosla, Adv. with Ms.Shreeanka Kakkar, Adv. versus RANJIT CHARLES SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Chetan Chawla, Adv. for R-2. AND + CM(M) No.1182/2012 & C.M. No.18468/2012 (for stay) PANCHSHILA HOSPITALITY VENTURES LTD. ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Arun Khosla, Adv. with Ms.Shreeanka Kakkar, Adv. versus RANJIT CHARLES SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Chetan Chawla, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The abovementioned petitions have been filed by two petitioners who are the plaintiffs in the learned Trial Court. In the petitions, both have challenged the orders dated 26th September, 2012 whereby their applications under Order 22 Rule 4(4) of the Code of Civ...
Tag this Judgment!Ved Prakash Talwar Vs. Canara Bank and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~-4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) No.9257/2004 VED PRAKASH TALWAR Through: ..... Petitioner None versus CANARA BANK & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Pradeep Diwan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rahul Jain, Advocate for R1 along with Mr. S.S. Mehra, Manager, Canara Bank Mr. Anuj Aggarwal & Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advocates for R-2 and R-3 along with Ms. Anupama Bhatnagar, Director, News Service Division, AIR, Akashwani, New Delhi % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR ORDER0404.2014 Rev. Pet. No.284/2009 Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate, is present on behalf of nonapplicants/respondent Nos.2 and 3. Ms. Anupama Bhatnagar, Director, News Service Division, AIR, Akashwani, New Delhi is present in court in compliance with the order dated 04.03.2014. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal submits that the cost of Rs.15,000/- has been paid by him in court through cheque in favour of the counsel for the applicant. Counsel also submitted that he had already filed reply on 02.04.2014. Heard. Vide ord...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India and ors. Vs. Ex.Lt.R.L.Yadav
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: April 01, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: April 04, 2014 + LPA4682011 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.Anil Gautam, Advocate versus EX.LT.R.L.YADAV Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Sukhjinder Singh, Advocate LPA6302011 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.Anil Gautam, Advocate versus EX.LT.R.P.YADAV Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Sukhjinder Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Respondent Lt.R.L.Yadav joined the Indian Navy as a Sailor (Sea-I) on October 19, 1963. He competed at an open selection for being granted a Short Service Commission and was successful. On March 09, 1970 he was granted Short Service Commission. The post was that of an Officer-SubLieutenant.2. Concededly the ranks which can be held as a Sailor are : - (i) Sea-I, (ii) Seaman, (iii) Petty Officer, (iv) Chief Petty Officer, an...
Tag this Judgment!Mrigender Chauhan Vs. Bses Rajdhani Private Limited
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 31, 2014 Decision on: April 4, 2014 CRL.A. No.60 of 2008 MRIGENDER CHAUHAN ..... Appellant-in-person. versus BSES RAJDHANI PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Anjali Sharma & Ms. Surabhi Aggarwal, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT0404.2014 1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 15thDecember 2007 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Special Electricity Court in CC No.1087/07, finding the Appellant guilty and convicting him under Section 135 of the Electricity Act 2003 (Act) and the order on sentence dated 17th December 2007 sentencing the accused to detention till the rising of the Court and directing him to pay a sum of Rs. 80,000 (in addition to the sum of Rs. 20,000 already paid by him as a condition for obtaining bail) as compensation to the Respondent, BSES Rajdhani Power Limited (BRPL), and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months.2. O...
Tag this Judgment!Munir @ Chota Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :31. t MARCH, 2014 DECIDED ON :4. h APRIL, 2014 + CRL.A.No.555/2012 MUNIR @ CHOTA ..... Appellant Through : versus Mr.S.S.Ahluwalia, Advocate. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. RESERVED ON :21. t MARCH, 2014 DECIDED ON :4. h APRIL, 2014 + CRL.A.No.556/2012 DULAL ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Kansal, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) Through : AND + ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CRL.A.No.557/2012 & CRL.M.B.No.435/2014 HARUN ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi Kansal, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) Through : Crl.A.Nos.555 - 557/2012 ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. Page 1 of 10 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Munir @ Chota (A-1), Dulal (A-2) and Harun (A-3) challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 19.12.2011 of learned Addl. Sess...
Tag this Judgment!