Delhi Court February 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 40 of about 540 results (0.016 seconds)Karan Agarwal Vs. M/S Prl Projects and Infrastructure Ltd.
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 02.2014 CO.PET.363/2012 & CA14462012 KARAN AGARWAL ..... Petitioner versus M/S PRL PROJECTS & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. .... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Anil Goel. For the Respondent : Mr Jaspreet S. Rai. Mr Rajiv Bahl for Official Liquidator. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. This is a petition for winding up of the respondent company under section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). It is alleged by the petitioner that a sum of `22,73,236/- was due and payable by the respondent to the petitioner for supply of goods (scaffolding and shuttering materials). The respondent disputes that any amount is due and payable to the petitioner and alleges that all payments have been made to the petitioner except for the material which was found to be defective.2. The controversy to be considered in the present case is whe...
Tag this Judgment!Rashid @ Raju Mental Vs. the State of the Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :29. h JANUARY, 2014 DECIDED ON :10. h FEBRUARY, 2014 + CRL.A. 1014/2012 RASHID @ RAJU MENTAL Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate. VERSUS THE STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by Rashid @ Raju Mental to challenge the legality of a judgment dated 26.05.2012 in Sessions Case No.67/11 arising out of FIR No.324/09 PS Govind Puri by which he was held perpetrator of the crime under Section 307 IPC and 25/54/59 Arms Act. By an order dated 28.05.2012, he was awarded RI for ten years with fine ` 10,000/- under Section 307 IPC and RI for two years with fine ` 5,000/- under Sections 25/54/59 Arms Act.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 19.08.2009 at about 08.30 P.M. in a park near Gali No.25, near Masjid, Tughlakabad Extension, he inflicted injuries to Asfaq Ahmad by a knife. The police sw...
Tag this Judgment!Ashwani Kumar Goel Vs. Income Tax Settlement Commission and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. 01.2014 Pronounced on:10.02.2014 + WP(C) No.2347/2008 & C.M. APPL. 4489/2008 ASHWANI KUMAR GOEL ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Meenakashi Midha with Mr.L.G. Dass, Advocates versus INCOME TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSION & ORS .... Respondents Through: Sh. N P Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr.Nitin Gulati, Jr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The petitioner seeks a direction challenging an order of 04.03.2008 issued by the Income Tax Settlement Commission, which rejected the petitioners application that the assessment for the period 01.04.1986 to 07.04.1987 was time barred. On 07.08.1997, search and seizure operations were conducted at the residential and business premises in respect of the petitioner, his wife and other relatives. Several articles and documents were RFA (OS) 2347/2008 Page 1 seized. The last panchnama was drawn on 26.09.199...
Tag this Judgment!United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kajal and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. h February 2014 % + MAC.APP. 5/2013 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms.Suman Bagga, Ms.Shruti Shukla and Mr.Dewashish Maharishi, Advocates. Versus KAJAL & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Vinod Sharma, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr.Shobhit Mittal, Advocate for Respondent No.5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is preferred against the impugned award dated 07.09.2012, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.12,24,744/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing the claim petition till realization of the amount.2. Brief facts of the case are that on 03.07.2009 at about 6.45 AM, a Bus bearing No.HP680946 was going from Uttar Kashi towards Gangotari in which deceased Ajay Kumar alongwith his friends and several other passengers were travelling. All of a sudden, the bu...
Tag this Judgment!Sheikh Azad Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:10.02.2014. CRL.REV.P. 640/2013 SHEIKH AZAD Through versus ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Bachhan, Adv. STATE Through ..... Respondent Mr. Varun Goswami, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1 The petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned judgment dated 19.10.2013 which, in appeal, has endorsed the finding of the learned MM dated 22.07.2013 and 24.07.2013 vide which the petitioner had been convicted under Section 448 of the IPC and had been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 6 months and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for 15 days. The impugned judgment had dismissed the appeal but had modified the sentence to the extent that the RI for 6 months under Section 448 of the IPC had been modified to SI for 6 months. The rest of the sentence remained unaltered. 2 The nominal roll of the petitioner has been summoned. The nominal as on 04.02.2014 reflects t...
Tag this Judgment!Archana Kumari Vs. M/S. G.D. Foods Manufacturing (i) Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on February 10, 2014 + W.P.(C) 953/2014 ARCHANA KUMARI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.K.B.Hina , Advocate. Versus M/S. G.D. FOODS MANUFACTURING (I) PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Represented by: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) CM No.1917/2014 This is an application filed seeking exemption from filing certified copy of the annexure P-1 to P-6. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. W.P.(C) No.953/2014 1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the award dated February 28, 2013 in I.D. No.501/11 passed by the Labour Court-XI, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, whereby the Labour Court has not granted any relief to the petitioner on the ground that she had not completed 240 days of continuous service with the respondent-management in the preceding 12 months.2. Some of the relevant facts are, it was the case of the petitioner she was employed by the respondent-management on Decembe...
Tag this Judgment!NavIn Sikand Vs. State and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % NAVIN SIKAND FAO No.9/2013 Through:10. h February, 2014 ......Appellant Mr. Vinod Wadhwa, Advocate. VERSUS STATE & ORS. Through: ...... Respondent Mr. Amit Tiwari, Adv. of LR No.4 of R-3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By the impugned order of the Administrative Civil Judge-cum- Additional Rent Controller (Central Delhi) dated 17.10.2012, the petition seeking succession certificate to the debts and securities of the deceased persons namely Sh. R.D.Sikand, Smt. Neera Sikand and Master Munish Sikand (being husband, wife and son respectively) was dismissed inasmuch as the petitioner Sh. Navin Sikand was having a later priority/entitlement as legal heir as the son of the second wife of Sh. Amar Chand Sikand, father of Sh. R.D.Sikand i.e Navin Sikand was only related by half blood to the legal heirs of Sh. Amar Chand Sikand through his first wife Smt. Prakash Kaur, a...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-ii Vs. Income Tax Settlement Comm ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. h January, 2014 Date of Decision:10th February, 2014 % + W.P. (C) 5262/2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-II ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Madan, sr. standing counsel with Mr Akash Vajpai, Advocate. versus INCOME TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSION & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. C.S. Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate with Mr Prakash Kumar and Mr Sheel Vardhan, Advocates. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, J.1. In the present proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the revenue calls in question the majority view taken in the impugned order dated 8.2.2013 passed by the Income Tax Settlement Commission, Principal Bench, New Delhi, (ITSC) granting immunity to the respondent No.2 from imposition of penalty and prosecution.2. Chapter XIX-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 consisting of sections 245A to 245M was inserted by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975, w.e.f. 1.4.1976. It ...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India Through Divisional Railway Manager, Vs. Smt. Prem Devi ...
Court: Delhi
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO3902013 & CM161132013 (stay) 10th February, 2014 % UNION OF INDIA THROUGH DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER, NORTHERN RAILWAY ..... Appellant Through Mr. Amit Dubey, Mr. Ravi Tyagi, Advocates versus SMT. PREM DEVI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Rajesh Tyagi, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal has been filed under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 impugning the order dated 24.5.2013 by which the application under Section 4(A) of the Act has been allowed and appellant has been fastened with the liability of the interest and penalty.2. It is now settled law in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Pratap NarainSingh Deo Vs. Srinivas Sabata & Anr., 1976 FAO3902013 Page 1 ACJ141 1976(1) SCC289that unless the compensation amount is deposited within one month of the date of the accident, the employer will ...
Tag this Judgment!Nawal Kishore Mehta @ Nawal Mehta Vs. Shashi Bansal @ Babli
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.199/2012 & CM No.21160/2012 (Stay) 10th February, 2014 % NAWAL KISHORE MEHTA @ NAWAL MEHTA ......Appellant Through: Mr. A.C.Bhasin and Mr. Amit Bhasin, Advocates. VERSUS SHASHI BANSAL @ BABLI Through: ...... Respondent None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This regular second appeal is filed by the appellant against the judgment of the first appellate court dated 1.2.2011 whereby the suit of the appellant-plaintiff has been dismissed as being barred by limitation.2. The following substantial question of law was framed by this Court on 21.2.2013:Whether the findings arrived at by the trial court are perverse, if so, to what effect?.3. Appellant-plaintiff filed a suit for declaration, injunction, recovery of arrears of rent of Rs.93,960/- etc on the ground that the original owner of the property being Flat No.BH-610C, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi was one Sh. Ram Sarup...
Tag this Judgment!