Delhi Court February 2014 Judgments
Onkar Swarop Bhatnagar and anr. Vs. M/S DrishticoIn Properties Pvt.Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-10-2014
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.S. (OS) No.1415/2011 Decided on :10. 02.2014 ONKAR SWAROP BHATNAGAR AND ANR. Plaintiff Through: Mr.S.K.Sharma, Mr.Puneet Relan and Mr.Prayas Aneja, Advs. Versus M/S DRISHTICOIN PROPERTIES PVT.LTD.& ANR. Defendant Through: Mr.Sanat Kumar and Mr.Ajay Satija, Advs.for D-1 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) OA No.15/2014 1. This is a chamber appeal against the order dated 20.11.2013. The plaintiff is raising the grievance with regard to the orders passed on two IAs being IA No.2187/2013 filed under Section 151 CPC and IA No.837/2013 filed under Section 148 r/w Section 151 CPC for enlargement of time to file the written statement.2. This is a suit for declaration and permanent injunction in which the defendant filed his written statement on 15.10.2011. Since there was a delay of 22 days in fling the written statement, an application under 148 r/w Section 151 CPC being IA No.837/2013 was filed seeking condonation of delay in fili...
Tag this Judgment!Mukesh Mohan Goel and ors. Vs. Asst. Engineer (Bldg) Central Zone Sout ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-10-2014
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 848/2012 MUKESH MOHAN GOEL & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar and Mr. Vivek, Advocates. versus ASST. ENGINEER (BLDG) CENTRAL ZONE SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna and Ms. Yoothica Pallavi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA (ORAL) 1. This contempt petition is predicated on the alleged non-compliance of the order dated 15.10.2012 in W.P.(C) No.6509/2012, where in this Court had allowed the writ and set aside the vacation notice dated 03.10.2012 given by the respondents herein to the petitioners. It is the case of the petitioners that the respondents have not complied with the orders of this Court by continuing with the demolition process and therefore are in contempt.2. The petitioners claim to be occupiers of Plot No.16A, Bagh Chandiwala, which is located between Mathura Road and Arab Ki Sarai (Nizamuddin), New Delh...
Tag this Judgment!Anil Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:07. 02.2014 + CRL.A. 784/2013 and Crl.M.(B) No.1261/2013 (suspension of sentence) ANIL KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr Shailender Dahiya, Adv with appellant in person. versus STATE + ..... Respondent Through: Ms Ritu Gauba, APP CRL.A. 877/2013 and Crl.M. (B) No.1411/2013 (suspension of sentence) SALIM ..... Appellant Through: Mr S.K. Sharma, Adv. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ritu Gauba, APP + CRL.A. 1361/2013 and Crl.M(B) No.2160/2013 (for suspension of sentence) JAGDISH @ BABLOO @ KALYUG ..... Appellant Through: Ms Payal Juneja, Adv. versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ritu Gauba, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) On 16.03.2005, the complainant Deepak Dogra was brought to Jairpur Golden Hospital in injured condition. On receipt of information in this regard, ASI Attar Singh of Police Station Sultan Puri reached the aforesaid hospital and r...
Tag this Judgment!Balwan Singh and ors. Vs. Sahara India Parivar and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on February 07, 2014 + W.P.(C) 4357/2013 BALWAN SINGH & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Ms.Monika Manocha, Adv. with Mr.Amandeep Mehra, Advocate versus SAHARA INDIA PARIVAR & ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Aman Walesha, Adv. for R-1 Mr.Anil Bhat, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) 1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the Award dated May 06, 2013 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court No.1, Karkardooma, Delhi (Tribunal in short) in I.D No.1/2013, whereby the Tribunal has dismissed the claim filed by the petitioners against his alleged termination beyond a period of 3 years as prescribed by sub-Section 3 of Section 2-Aof the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short Act).2. Three petitioners were appointed by the respondent No.1 as Security Assistant (petitioner No.1 &2) and Engineering Assistant (petitioner No.3) with the respondent No.1. ...
Tag this Judgment!Oriental Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Ouseph Joseph and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2014
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:7. h February, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 186/2011 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Pradeep Gaur, Advocate. Versus OUSEPH JOSEPH & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Vipin Nandwani, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) MAC.APP. 186/2011 1. The present appeal is preferred against the impugned award dated 29.11.2010, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.1,80,804/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization of the amount.2. The present appeal is filed only on the ground that the accident in question had taken place on 25.09.2007 and the respondent No.2/driver of the offending vehicle was not holding valid driving licence on that date.3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted that the appellant/Insurance Company served the n...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Garment House and ors. Vs. Sh. Bhim SaIn and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.163/2013 % 7th February, 2014 M/S. GARMENT HOUSE AND ORS. Through: None. ......Appellants VERSUS SH. BHIM SAIN AND ANR. Through: ...... Respondents None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.12571/2013 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. + RSA No.163/2013 and C.M. No.12570/2013 (stay) 2. This Regular Second Appeal impugns the concurrent judgments and decrees of the courts below; of the trial court dated 1.5.2012 and the first appellate court RSA No.163/2013 dated 17.5.2013; by which the suit the respondents/plaintiffs for recovery of money for goods supplied was decreed.3. Before the courts below, the respondents/plaintiffs proved on record the visiting cards issued by the appellants as Ex.PW1/47 to Ex.PW1/79 and which contain the signatures of the appellants showing receipt of the goods. The corresponding in...
Tag this Judgment!Salim Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:07. 02.2014 + CRL.A. 784/2013 and Crl.M.(B) No.1261/2013 (suspension of sentence) ANIL KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr Shailender Dahiya, Adv with appellant in person. versus STATE + ..... Respondent Through: Ms Ritu Gauba, APP CRL.A. 877/2013 and Crl.M. (B) No.1411/2013 (suspension of sentence) SALIM ..... Appellant Through: Mr S.K. Sharma, Adv. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ritu Gauba, APP + CRL.A. 1361/2013 and Crl.M(B) No.2160/2013 (for suspension of sentence) JAGDISH @ BABLOO @ KALYUG ..... Appellant Through: Ms Payal Juneja, Adv. versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ritu Gauba, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) On 16.03.2005, the complainant Deepak Dogra was brought to Jairpur Golden Hospital in injured condition. On receipt of information in this regard, ASI Attar Singh of Police Station Sultan Puri reached the aforesaid hospital and r...
Tag this Judgment!Oswal Agro Mills Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:07. 02.2014 + ITA412000 OSWAL AGRO MILLS LTD ..... Appellant versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr C.S. Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate with Mr Prakash Kumar and Mr Sheel Vardhan. For the Respondent : Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The present appeal has filed by the appellant under section 260A(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the order dated 16.09.1999 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) in I.T.A. No.2722/De1/91 relating to assessment year 1987-88. The order dated 16.09.1999 is hereinafter referred to as the impugned order.2. The impugned order is a common order whereby the Tribunal disposed of the appeals relating to the Assessment Years 1986-87 a...
Tag this Judgment!Mohan Murti Shandilya Vs. Pyare Lal Taheem and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: February 07, 2014 + RFA(OS) 15/2014 MOHAN MURTI SHANDILYA ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms.Ananya Bhattacharya, Advocate with Mr.Mohan Shandliya, Appellant in person versus PYARE LAL TAHEEM & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.M.M.Kalra, Advocate with Mr.Kunal Kalra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Vide impugned decree dated July 30, 2013 noting that the defence of the appellant had been struck of, a decree in sum of `23,45,430/- has been passed in favour of the respondents and against the appellant with further direction that if decretal amount is not paid within eight weeks the same shall bear simple interest @12% per annum till date of payment.2. To understand the contention advanced by the appellant as also to understand the decree we need to note the relevant facts.3. Pyare Lal Taheem and his wife Indra Rani Taheem (the respondents) a...
Tag this Judgment!Jagdish @ Babloo @ Kalyug Vs. State (Gnct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:07. 02.2014 + CRL.A. 784/2013 and Crl.M.(B) No.1261/2013 (suspension of sentence) ANIL KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr Shailender Dahiya, Adv with appellant in person. versus STATE + ..... Respondent Through: Ms Ritu Gauba, APP CRL.A. 877/2013 and Crl.M. (B) No.1411/2013 (suspension of sentence) SALIM ..... Appellant Through: Mr S.K. Sharma, Adv. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ritu Gauba, APP + CRL.A. 1361/2013 and Crl.M(B) No.2160/2013 (for suspension of sentence) JAGDISH @ BABLOO @ KALYUG ..... Appellant Through: Ms Payal Juneja, Adv. versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ritu Gauba, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) On 16.03.2005, the complainant Deepak Dogra was brought to Jairpur Golden Hospital in injured condition. On receipt of information in this regard, ASI Attar Singh of Police Station Sultan Puri reached the aforesaid hospital and r...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »