Delhi Court February 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 39 of about 540 results (0.017 seconds)Govt. of Nct of Delhi Vs. M/S. Nav Nirman Construction Co.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OMP No.233 of 2007 Reserved on: February 04, 2014 Decision on: February 10, 2014 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan, Addl. Standing Counsel with Mr. Pratap Singh, Advocate versus M/S. NAV NIRMAN CONSTRUCTION CO. ..... Respsondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Sharma with Mr. Amit Choudhary, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT1002.2014 1. This is a petition by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) through its Executive Engineer, Irrigation and Flood Control Department praying that the Award dated 19th January 2007 passed by the learned Arbitrator be set aside.2. The background to the present petition is that the Respondent, M/s. Nav Nirman Construction Co. (NNCC) was awarded the work for construction of an inlet/outfall structure of a DDA storm water drain by letter dated 9th November 1992. Subsequently, an agreement dated 18th November 1992 was entered into between the parties. The st...
Tag this Judgment!Aruna Chadha Vs. State of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Bail Application No.2191/2013 Reserved on:6. h February, 2014 Date of Decision:10. h February, 2014 % ARUNA CHADHA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.U.U. Lalit, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manoj V. George, Adv. Versus STATE OF NCT DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sidharth Luthra, ASG with Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State Mr. Kanwarjeet Singh, Adv. for Deceased complainant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J1 By way of present application under Section 439 read with Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (for short `Cr.P.C.), the petitioner Aruna Chadha seeks bail in case FIR No.178/2012 under Sections 306/304/34 IPC registered at P.S. Bharat Nagar, Delhi.2. Notice of the application was given to the State. Status report has been filed by the State.3. I have heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Solicitor General for the State.4. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner sub...
Tag this Judgment!National Textile Corporation Ltd Vs. Union of India and Anrq
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h February, 2014. + LPA8082012 & CM No.20667/2012 (for stay) NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjoy Ghose & Mohd. Farukh, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Kamal Khurana, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 22nd November, 2012 of the learned Single Judge of this Court of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.5527/2012 filed by the appellant. The said writ petition was filed impugning the notice dated 17th October, 2011 of arbitration served on the appellant and for restraining the respondents in the writ petition i.e. Union of India (UOI), Ministry of Heavy Industries & Public Enterprises and the UCO Bank from proceeding further with the illegal and unconstitutional arbitral proceedings.2....
Tag this Judgment!Maulana Saleem Vs. Tamizan
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:10.02.2014. CRL.REV.P. 75/2013 & Crl. M.A.Nos.1641-1643/2013 MAULANA SALEEM Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Ishaan Chhaya, Adv. versus TAMIZAN Through ..... Respondent Mr. M.L. Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1 The petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 11.05.2012 wherein while disposing off a petition under Section 125 of the Cr.PC, the Family Court Judge had directed the petitioner to pay maintenance @ Rs.3,500/- per month which would be effective from January, 2012; for earlier periods i.e. from the date of filing of the petition which was on 16.04.2007 up to 31.12.2009, the petitioner had been directed to pay maintenance @ Rs.1,500/- per month and w.e.f. 01.01.2010 up to 31.12.2011, he had been directed to pay maintenance @ Rs.3,000/- per month. 2 The allegation of the complainant-wife was that the petitioner is running a furniture showroom at D-1/B, Rana Pratap ...
Tag this Judgment!National Agro Chemicals Industtries Ltd. Vs. National Research Develop ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : January 20, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : February 10, 2014 + RFA(OS)124/2012 NATIONAL AGRO CHEMICALS INDUSTTRIES LTD. .Appellant Represented by: Mr.Amit Sibal, Mr.Sumeet Bhatia and Mr.Prateek Chadda, Advocates versus NATIONAL RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ....Respondent Represented by: Mr.P.N.Bhardwaj and Mr.Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The present Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 for setting aside the judgment and decree dated September 06, 2012 whereby the appellant was restrained from using technology/knowhow given by the respondent for manufacture of Pesticide Monocrotophos Technical unless the appellant paid the royalty. A preliminary decree was also passed wherein the respondent was held entitled to royalty in terms of the License Agreement and also entitled to ren...
Tag this Judgment!Tarsem Singh Vs. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order reserved on:03. 02.2014 Date of Decision:10. 02.2014 + Crl. Appeal 637/2013 TARSEM SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Vishal Raj Sehijpal, Adv. Versus DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala and Mr. Amish Aggarwala Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.Crl.M(B) No.994/2013 The case of the prosecution is that on 03.01.2009, a Tata Sumo vehicle was signaled and stopped, as the officials of DRI had information that narcotic drug was being carried in the said vehicle, but the driver, instead of stopping the vehicle accelerated its speed. The vehicle was then chased by the DRI officials. After some time, all of a sudden, the said vehicle was stopped at G.T. Karnal Road and both the occupants of the vehicle, including the appellant, came out and tried to escape. The appellant was apprehended, whereas his companion managed to escape. On search of the vehicle, heroin weighing 7...
Tag this Judgment!Nawlesh Prasad and anr Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
$~8 to 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO5572011, FAO5602011 and FAO5612011 10th February, 2014 % NAWLESH PRASAD & ANR Through: None ..... Appellants versus UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Mr.J.K.Singh, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. On the last date of hearing adjournment was sought on behalf of the appellants and which was allowed in the interest of justice subject to depositing of costs of Rs.5,00/- in each of the appeals. Today no one appears on behalf of the appellants and nor is there any proof that costs have been deposited. It may be noted that even earlier on 12.02.2013 adjournment was sought on behalf of the appellants. FAO Nos.557/2011 & conn. matters page 1 of 5 2. Counsel for the respondent very strongly opposes the adjournment and states that strategies are being used to unnecessarily delay the disposal of the appeals which be decided on merits. I have therefore h...
Tag this Judgment!Hari Chand Vs. Nagender Singh Panesar and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~16-17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + 10th February, 2014 RSA2032010 HARI CHAND ..... Appellant Through Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate versus NAGENDER SINGH PANESAR & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. T.C. Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2, 4 to 7. + RSA2052010 HARI CHAND ..... Appellant Through Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate versus KAMAL KISHORE & ORS. .... Respondents Through Mr. T.C. Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 3, 5 & 6. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM Nos. 5661/2011, 5287-88/2012, 16241-16244/2012 in RSA2032010 CM Nos. 5165/2011, 5329-30/2012, 16245-46/2012, 16235-36/2012 in RSA2052010 There is no opposition to any of the applications and the same are, therefore, allowed, without prejudice to the merits of the matter. CMs stand disposed of. RSA2032010 & RSA2052010 1. These appeals arise from the impugned judgment of the first appellate court dated 30.1.2010. By the impugned ju...
Tag this Judgment!Smt.Machala and ors. Vs. Manoj Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. h February 2014 % + MAC.APP. 675/2013 SMT.MACHALA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Jatinder Kamra, Advocate. Versus MANOJ KUMAR & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Suman Bagga, Ms.Shruti Shukla and Mr.Dewashish Maharishi, Advocate for Respondent No.3/Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. dated The present appeal is directed against the impugned award 15.12.2012, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.10,66,004/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of filing the claim petition till realization of the amount.2. Vide the present appeal, the appellants are seeking enhancement of the award amount as noted above.3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants/claimants has argued that PW1Smt.Machala Devi, wife of the deceased has stated in her evidence by way of affidavit that besides being an earn...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Titagarh Wagons Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h February, 2014 % + LPA No.971/2013 & CM No.20515/2013 M/S TITAGARH WAGONS LTD. .. Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. along with Mr. Ashish Verma and Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: .. Respondents Sinha, Adv. for Mr. R.V. Railways. Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv. along with Mr. P.K. Bansal, Adv. for R-3 AND + LPA No.949/2013 & CMs No.19843/2013 & 1674-76/2014 M/S JUPITER WAGONS LTD. .. Appellant Through: Mr. U. Hazarika, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vineet Tayal & Mr. Suvradal Choudhary, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .. Respondents Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha, Adv. for Railways. Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv. along with Mr. P.K. Bansal, Adv. for R-2. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 Both intra-court appeals impugn the order dated 3rd April, 2013 of the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) No.7695/2012 preferred by the respondent No.2 in ...
Tag this Judgment!