Delhi Court February 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 36 of about 540 results (0.021 seconds)Smt Ranjana Gupta Vs. Rajnesh Gupta and ors
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:11.02.2014. CRL.REV.P. 637/2013 SMT RANJANA GUPTA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Kuldeep Kumar, Adv. versus RAJNESH GUPTA & ORS Through ..... Respondents Ms.Fizani Hussain, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1 The petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 29.07.2013 endorsing the finding of the learned MM dated 28.03.2012 vide which the order passed on the complaint case (CC No.174/2003) under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as PWDVA) had been disposed of without granting any relief to the petitioner. Relevant would it be to extract that part of the order passed by the learned MM. It reads as under:9. Relief. As far as relief is concerned, complainant has sought firstly protection order u/s 18 PW DV Act. Complainant has been residing separately since 05.10.2004. There are no complaints in the intervening period or eve...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. J.S. Gambhir Vs. Millennium Health Institute and Diagnostics Pvt. ...
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 02.2014 CA No.301/2013 IN CO. PET. 203/2007 DR. J.S. GAMBHIR ..... Petitioner versus MILLENNIUM HEALTH INSTITUTE AND DIAGNOSTICS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr D.R. Bhatia. For the Respondent : Mr Pankaj Chaudhary, for R-4/applicant in C.A. 301/2013. Mr Rajat Navet proxy counsel for Mr Deepak Jain. Mr Kanwal Chaudhary for Official Liquidator. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 This is an application filed by the applicant seeking recall of the order dated 07.11.2012 passed by this Court whereby the Ex-Directors of the respondent company, (in liquidation), Mr Deepak Kumar Jain and the applicant, were directed to deposit a sum of `9.23 lacs in two equal proportions in the office of the Official Liquidator. This direction was passed pursuant to a report (report no.650/2012) submitted by the Official Liquidator. This Court concluded that th...
Tag this Judgment!Delhi Development Authority Vs. Ramesh Kumar Budhiraja
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. No.4 of 2013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Advocate with Mr. R.C. Gauniyal, A.E., DDA. versus RAMESH KUMAR BUDHIRAJA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vikram Singh Panwar, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER1102.2014 Crl.L.P. No.4 of 2013 & Crl.M.A. No.46 of 2013 (for delay) 1. There is an inordinate delay of 237 days in filing leave to appeal against the order dated 25th August 2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-2 (ASJ), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CA No.64 of 2012 and order dated 5th October 2011 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (MM) in Complaint Case No.216 of 2001 acquitting the Respondent of the offence under Section 14 read with Section 29 (2) of the Delhi Development Authority Act, 1957.2. Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner has produced before the Court a written synopsis explaining that the Petitioner had wrongly filed th...
Tag this Judgment!Jaswant @ Kale Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:11. 02.2014 + CRL.A. 1478/2013 JAINUL UMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rajpal Singh, Adv. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CRL.A. 1479/2013 JASWANT @ KALE Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rajpal Singh, Adv. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) On 15.06.2011, on receipt of copy of DD No.24A, SI Arvind Kumar of Police Station Gandhi Nagar, reached house No.2931, Gali No.3,Kailash Nagar, where the complainant Raj Kumar Srivastava was present and recorded his statement. The complainant alleged that on the aforesaid date at about 10.15 PM, when he was present in his house, a boy aged about 22-25 years with dark complexion and slim body structure entered his room and enquired about one Mr Jain.. When he asked the boy as to who he was, he started searching the almirah, took out Rs 2,00,000/- ...
Tag this Judgment!Todar Mal Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :2. d DECEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :11. h FEBRUARY, 2014 + CRL.A. 580/2001 TODAR MAL Through : ....Appellant Mr. K.B.Andley, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Mohd. Shamikh & Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocates. VERSUS STATE OF DELHI Through : .Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Todar Mal (the appellant) impugns a judgment dated 28.07.2001 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.76/2001 arising out of FIR No.87/97 PS Seelam Pur whereby he was convicted for committing offence punishable under Section 307 IPC and by an order on sentence of the same date, he was awarded RI for two years with fine ` 2,000/-.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 29.01.1997 at about 03.30 P.M. in front of house No.31/2, gali No.2, Maujpur, he along with his associate in furtherance of common intention inflicted injuries to Chander Kumar in an attempt to murder him. The police machinery was set in motion after reco...
Tag this Judgment!Marubeni India P.Ltd. Vs. the Special Director of Enforcement
Court: Delhi
* 11. + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.445 of 2007 MARUBENI INDIA P.LTD. Through: None. ..... Appellant versus THE SPECIAL DIRECTOR OF ENFOREMENT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar Panda, Senior Advocate with Mr. Naveen Kumar Matta, Advocate. WITH12 + CRL.A. No.612 of 2006 SONY INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P.V. Kapur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vijay Nair and Mr. Rajat Juneja, Advocates. versus SPECIAL DIRECTOR, ENFOREMENT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar Panda, Senior Advocate with Mr. Naveen Kumar Matta, Advocate. WITH13 + CRL.A. 614 of 2006 ERICSSON INDIA P.LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rohini Musa, Advocate. Advocate. versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFOREMENT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar Panda, Senior Advocate with Mr. Naveen Kumar Matta, Advocate. WITH14 + CRL.A. No.621 of 2006 NOKIA INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Bansal, Advocate. versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEME...
Tag this Judgment!Future Generali India Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Rina Devi and ors
Court: Delhi
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. h February, 2014 MAC.APP. 1131/2012 FUTURE GENERALI INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. versus RINA DEVI & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: NEMO. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Present appeal is directed against the impugned award dated 19.09.2012, whereby ld. Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.17,94,582/- (wrongly typed as Rs.15,72,638/-) with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization of the amount.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted that there are 7 dependents, i.e., wife, five children and mother. However, Ld. Tribunal has considered 8 dependents, i.e., wife, five children and parents, accordingly deducted 1/10th towards personal expenses from the income of the deceased while calculating the compensation.3. Ld. Counsel further submitted that as per ...
Tag this Judgment!Jainul Umar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:11. 02.2014 + CRL.A. 1478/2013 JAINUL UMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rajpal Singh, Adv. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CRL.A. 1479/2013 JASWANT @ KALE Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rajpal Singh, Adv. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) On 15.06.2011, on receipt of copy of DD No.24A, SI Arvind Kumar of Police Station Gandhi Nagar, reached house No.2931, Gali No.3,Kailash Nagar, where the complainant Raj Kumar Srivastava was present and recorded his statement. The complainant alleged that on the aforesaid date at about 10.15 PM, when he was present in his house, a boy aged about 22-25 years with dark complexion and slim body structure entered his room and enquired about one Mr Jain.. When he asked the boy as to who he was, he started searching the almirah, took out Rs 2,00,000/- ...
Tag this Judgment!Association of State Road Transport Undertaking Vs. Devender Singh
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on January 29, 2014 Judgment Delivered on February 11, 2014 + W.P.(C) 2354/2012 ASSOCIATION OF STATE ROAD TRANSPORT UNDERTAKING ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.J.S.Bhasin, Advocate with Ms.Rashmi Priya, Advocate versus DEVENDER SINGH ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Atul T.N, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the Award dated March 02, 2012 in L.I.R No.1250/2011 unique case I.D No.02402C0047152002 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court IX (East) Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, whereby the Labour Court has held the termination of respondent as illegal, thereby directing his reinstatement with continuity of service and full back wages since the date of his termination.2. The industrial dispute was referred for adjudication by the Labour Court in terms of the following reference:Whether the termination of Sh.Devender Singh s/o Sh.Ram Kishan fr...
Tag this Judgment!Jitender Mathuria Vs. M/S. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on January 15, 2014 Judgment Delivered on February 11, 2014 + W.P.(C) 2923/2007 JITENDER MATHURIA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.S. Chakraborty, Advocate versus M/S. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Raavi Birbal, Advocate with + W.P.(C) 3747/2007 HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORP. LTD. Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Raavi Birbal, Advocate versus JITENDER MATHURIA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.S.Chakraborty, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. By this order, I shall dispose of the above captioned writ petitions which have been filed against an award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-II, New Delhi (Tribunal in short) dated September 07, 2006 in I.D. No.61/2003 with a further challenge to the order dated June 27, 2005 passed by the Tribunal, vitiating the inquiry conducted by the petitioner against the respondent Jitender Mathuria in W...
Tag this Judgment!