Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 91 of about 1,089 results (0.022 seconds)M/S Bharat Power Control System Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
29 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:03. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 8462/2014 M/S BHARAT POWER CONTROL SYSTEM ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Tanuj Khurana and Mr Gaurav Malik, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Dr. Kumar Jwala, Advocates for R-1 & R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) CM No.19590/2014 (Exemption) The exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 8462/2014 & CM No.19589/2014 (Stay) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned communication dated 30.10.2014 issued by the Executive Engineer, Central Public Works Department, Parliament House Annexe Project Electrical Division. WP(C) 8462/2014 virtue of the impugned letter dated 30.10.2014, the petitioners bid pursuant to the respondents NIT for extension of Parliament House Annexe, Parliament...
Tag this Judgment!Jitender @ Bunty Vs. State (Govt. of N.C.T)
Court: Delhi
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: December 03, 2014 + CRL.A. 812/2011 JITENDER @ BUNTY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Biswajit Kumar Patra, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T) Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP SI Md.Horoon, P.S.Tilak Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Process of criminal law was set into motion when DD No.54A, Ex.PW-5/A, was recorded at 3:30 hours (middle of the night) on February 18, 2008 by the duty officer of PS Tilak Nagar to the effect that Jitender @ Bunty had reached the police station and informed that suspecting the character of his wife Jyoti he had killed her and the dead body had been kept by him in house No.WZ-32/8A, Gali No.4, Sant Garh. That he was willing to face the consequence of his action.2. Insp.Surender Dev PW-13, who was present at PS Tilak Nagar, when DD No.54A was recorded, proceeded to Chaukhandi Village, ...
Tag this Judgment!National Highways Authority of India Vs. Ashok Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:03. 12.2014 + W.P. (C) 8412/2014 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Aayushi Kiran with Ms. Tanupriya Gupta and Mr. Mukesh Verma, Advocates. versus ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. Issue notice to the respondent. Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent. With consent, matter has been taken up for disposal.2. The petitioner feels aggrieved by an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter referred to as CAT) dated 11.09.2014 passed in OA14182014. By that order, the NHAI has been directed to reconsider the respondent/applicants case for absorption.3. The facts are that the applicant joined the National Highways Authority of India (hereafter referred to as NHAI) as Manager (Technical) on deputation. He is a permanent o...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Jac Air Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pramod Kumar
Court: Delhi
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on 3rd December, 2014 + W.P.(C) 8454/2014 M/S JAC AIR SERVICES PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Pramod Kumar Sharma and Mr. Manish Kumar Sharma, Advocates. Versus PRAMOD KUMAR Represented by: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ..... Respondent SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CM No.19520/2014 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed. W.P.(C) 8454/2014 1. Vide the instant petition, the petitioner/Establishment has assailed the award dated 24.03.2014, whereby while setting aside the order of suspension and dismissal dated 18.02.2010 passed by the petitioner/Establishment, the learned Tribunal directed reinstatement of the respondent/workman with directions to the petitioner/Establishment to conduct a fresh inquiry after observing all the principles of natural justice and giving the workman fair and proper opportunity to represent himself and to d...
Tag this Judgment!Agastya Shelat Vs. University of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d December, 2014. % + LPA No.768/2014 AGASTYA SHELAT Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Ms. Mithu Jain, Mr. Deepak Pathak and Ms. Astha Sharma, Advs. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal with Ms. Yamni Phazang, Advs. for R-1/DU. AND + W.P.(C) No.8216/2014 AGASTYA SHELAT Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Ms. Mithu Jain, Mr. Deepak Pathak and Ms. Astha Sharma, Advs. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal with Ms. Yamni Phazang, Advs. for R-1/DU. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The intra court appeal, being LPA No.768/2014 was preferred impugning the order dated 25th November, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) No.8216/2014 filed by the appellant, issuing the notice thereof to the respondents University of Delhi and Sri Venkate...
Tag this Judgment!Virender Singh Vs. M/S Lancer Convent Senior Secondary School
Court: Delhi
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on 3rd December, 2014 + W.P.(C) No.8497/2014 VIRENDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Arun K. Yadav, Advocate. Versus M/S LANCER CONVENT SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL ..... Respondent Represented by: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CM No.19649/2014 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed. W.P.(C) 8497/2014 1. The present petition is directed against the award dated 09.05.2014, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.75,000/- in favour of the petitioner/workman in lieu of reinstatement, back wages and other benefits.2. The case of the petitioner before the learned Tribunal was that he was appointed on the post of 'Driver' in July, 2002, on a monthly salary of Rs.8281/-. The respondent / Management was not providing legal facilities according to labour laws, therefore, he was demanding the...
Tag this Judgment!State Vs. RiyazuddIn and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 20, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 03, 2014 % + CRL.A. 577/2013 RIYAZUDDIN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Mohit Mathur, Advocate with Mr.Amish Dabas, Mr.Devendra Dedha, Mr.Praman Mathur, Mr.Manoj Pant, Mr.Badar Mehmood, Mr.Pankaj Verma, Ms.Utkarsha Kohli and Ms.Vasudha Datta, Advocates versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Represented by: + ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Inspector Lokender Singh, PS Malviya Nagar Ms.Karuna Chhatwal, Advocate with Mr.Shailendra Babbar, Advocate for Board of Homeopathy. CRL.A. 1155/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Inspector Lokender Singh, PS Malviya Nagar. versus RIYAZUDDIN & ORS. Represented by: Crl.A.No.577 of 2013 & 1155 of 2014 ..... Respondents Mr.Mohit Mathur, Advocate with Mr.Amish Dabas, Mr.Devinder Dedha, Mr.Praman Mathur and Ms.Vasudha Data, Advocates for R-1 Page 1 of 11 Mr.Chander M.Maini, Advocate with Mr.Satyam Chaturved...
Tag this Judgment!Smt Indu Anand Vs. Rattan Furniture Stores and Ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:30. 10.2014 Judgment pronounced on:03. 12.2014 FAO (OS) 68/2014 SMT INDU ANAND ..... Appellant versus RATTAN FURNITURE STORES & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Advocate with Mr Varun Rajpal, Advocate For the Respondents : Ms Supriya Juneja, Advocate for R-1 & R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present is an appeal filed under order 43 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred as CPC) assailing the order dated 09.12.2013 passed by a learned Single Judge of this court whereby two applications, one (IA No.8605/2013) under Order 12 Rule 6, CPC, for possession/ejectment and the other (IA No.8604/2013 ) under Order 39 Rule 10, CPC, to deposit Rs.1,50,000 per month in court respectively were dismissed in CS(OS) 3569/2012 being a suit for recovery, possess...
Tag this Judgment!Gautam Khaitan Vs. Enforcement Directorate
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. h November, 2014 Date of Decision:03rd December, 2014 % + BAIL APPLN. 2354/2014 GAUTAM KHAITAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P.V. Kapur with Mr. Siddarth Luthra and Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocates with Mr. K.K. Manan, Mr. P.K. Dubey, Advocates. versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC and Mr. Akash Nagar, Advocate with Mr. Vikas Singh, Dy. Director/ I.O. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH1 By this application filed under Section 439 read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C., the petitioner is seeking No.DLZO/15/2014/AD(VM)/CBI/ACU-V/NEW bail in DELHI ECIR under Section 120B read with Section 420 of IPC and Sections 7/8/9/12/13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of PC Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as PC Act) read with Sections 3 and 4 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (for short, PMLA) registered by the Enforcement Department, New Delhi on 03.07.2014.2. T...
Tag this Judgment!Anju @ Sonia @ Baby Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : November 18, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : December 03, 2014 + CRL.A.456/2014 ANIL KUMAR Represented by: .....Appellant Ms.Nandita Rao, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: .....Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Satish Kumar Sharma and Insp.N.S.Chauhan CRL.A.199/2014 PREM PAL Represented by: .....Appellant Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: .....Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Satish Kumar Sharma and Insp.N.S.Chauhan CRL.A.393/2014 ANJU @ SONIA @ BABY Represented by: .....Appellant Mr.Joginder Tuli, Advocate with Mr.Tarun Nanda, Mr.Ashu Kumar Sharma and Ms.Pooja Arora, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: .....Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Satish Kumar Sharma and Insp.N.S.Chauhan CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Process of criminal law was set into motion when at around 7:45 PM on February 08, 2007, DD No.52B, ...
Tag this Judgment!