Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Virender Singh Vs. M/S Lancer Convent Senior Secondary School
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on 3rd December, 2014 + W.P.(C) No.8497/2014 VIRENDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Arun K. Yadav, Advocate. Versus M/S LANCER CONVENT SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL ..... Respondent Represented by: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CM No.19649/2014 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed. W.P.(C) 8497/2014 1. The present petition is directed against the award dated 09.05.2014, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.75,000/- in favour of the petitioner/workman in lieu of reinstatement, back wages and other benefits.2. The case of the petitioner before the learned Tribunal was that he was appointed on the post of 'Driver' in July, 2002, on a monthly salary of Rs.8281/-. The respondent / Management was not providing legal facilities according to labour laws, therefore, he was demanding the...
Gautam Khaitan Vs. Enforcement Directorate
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. h November, 2014 Date of Decision:03rd December, 2014 % + BAIL APPLN. 2354/2014 GAUTAM KHAITAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P.V. Kapur with Mr. Siddarth Luthra and Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocates with Mr. K.K. Manan, Mr. P.K. Dubey, Advocates. versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC and Mr. Akash Nagar, Advocate with Mr. Vikas Singh, Dy. Director/ I.O. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH1 By this application filed under Section 439 read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C., the petitioner is seeking No.DLZO/15/2014/AD(VM)/CBI/ACU-V/NEW bail in DELHI ECIR under Section 120B read with Section 420 of IPC and Sections 7/8/9/12/13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of PC Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as PC Act) read with Sections 3 and 4 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (for short, PMLA) registered by the Enforcement Department, New Delhi on 03.07.2014.2. T...
Jitender @ Bunty Vs. State (Govt. of N.C.T)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: December 03, 2014 + CRL.A. 812/2011 JITENDER @ BUNTY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Biswajit Kumar Patra, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T) Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP SI Md.Horoon, P.S.Tilak Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Process of criminal law was set into motion when DD No.54A, Ex.PW-5/A, was recorded at 3:30 hours (middle of the night) on February 18, 2008 by the duty officer of PS Tilak Nagar to the effect that Jitender @ Bunty had reached the police station and informed that suspecting the character of his wife Jyoti he had killed her and the dead body had been kept by him in house No.WZ-32/8A, Gali No.4, Sant Garh. That he was willing to face the consequence of his action.2. Insp.Surender Dev PW-13, who was present at PS Tilak Nagar, when DD No.54A was recorded, proceeded to Chaukhandi Village, ...
M/S Jac Air Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pramod Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on 3rd December, 2014 + W.P.(C) 8454/2014 M/S JAC AIR SERVICES PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Pramod Kumar Sharma and Mr. Manish Kumar Sharma, Advocates. Versus PRAMOD KUMAR Represented by: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ..... Respondent SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CM No.19520/2014 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed. W.P.(C) 8454/2014 1. Vide the instant petition, the petitioner/Establishment has assailed the award dated 24.03.2014, whereby while setting aside the order of suspension and dismissal dated 18.02.2010 passed by the petitioner/Establishment, the learned Tribunal directed reinstatement of the respondent/workman with directions to the petitioner/Establishment to conduct a fresh inquiry after observing all the principles of natural justice and giving the workman fair and proper opportunity to represent himself and to d...
M/S Bharat Power Control System Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
29 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:03. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 8462/2014 M/S BHARAT POWER CONTROL SYSTEM ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Tanuj Khurana and Mr Gaurav Malik, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Dr. Kumar Jwala, Advocates for R-1 & R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) CM No.19590/2014 (Exemption) The exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 8462/2014 & CM No.19589/2014 (Stay) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned communication dated 30.10.2014 issued by the Executive Engineer, Central Public Works Department, Parliament House Annexe Project Electrical Division. WP(C) 8462/2014 virtue of the impugned letter dated 30.10.2014, the petitioners bid pursuant to the respondents NIT for extension of Parliament House Annexe, Parliament...
Agastya Shelat Vs. University of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d December, 2014. % + LPA No.768/2014 AGASTYA SHELAT Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Ms. Mithu Jain, Mr. Deepak Pathak and Ms. Astha Sharma, Advs. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal with Ms. Yamni Phazang, Advs. for R-1/DU. AND + W.P.(C) No.8216/2014 AGASTYA SHELAT Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Ms. Mithu Jain, Mr. Deepak Pathak and Ms. Astha Sharma, Advs. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal with Ms. Yamni Phazang, Advs. for R-1/DU. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The intra court appeal, being LPA No.768/2014 was preferred impugning the order dated 25th November, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) No.8216/2014 filed by the appellant, issuing the notice thereof to the respondents University of Delhi and Sri Venkate...
National Highways Authority of India Vs. Ashok Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:03. 12.2014 + W.P. (C) 8412/2014 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Aayushi Kiran with Ms. Tanupriya Gupta and Mr. Mukesh Verma, Advocates. versus ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. Issue notice to the respondent. Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent. With consent, matter has been taken up for disposal.2. The petitioner feels aggrieved by an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter referred to as CAT) dated 11.09.2014 passed in OA14182014. By that order, the NHAI has been directed to reconsider the respondent/applicants case for absorption.3. The facts are that the applicant joined the National Highways Authority of India (hereafter referred to as NHAI) as Manager (Technical) on deputation. He is a permanent o...
Sh. Harmeet Singh Vs. Smt. Anshu Aggarwal and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI C.M.(M) No.84 /2014 and C.M.No.1514/2014 (delay) 03rd December, 2014 % SH. HARMEET SINGH ......Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. VERSUS SMT. ANSHU AGGARWAL & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner appears in person and seeks an adjournment. I refuse to grant adjournment because this is one of the extreme cases of abuse of the process of the law which this Court has seen and which will become clear from the factual details, which I am stating below. Also, this case has already come up on two occasions earlier, yet no notice till date is issued. Therefore, no adjournment as prayed for can be granted as prayed by the petitioner on the ground that his counsel is not well.2. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner/plaintiff impugning the judgment dated 30.03.2013 of t...
Sh. Hem Raj and Ors. Vs. Sh. Nihal Chand and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI C.R.P.No.115/2014 & C.M.Nos.12897-12900/2014 03rd December, 2014 % SH. HEM RAJ & ORS. Through: ......Petitioners Mr.B.L.Gupta, Advocate. VERSUS SH. NIHAL CHAND & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This is a wholly frivolous and a malafide petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) filed by three defendants to a suit for partition, and who do not want to vacate the suit property, although the suit property has been auctioned, auction purchaser has deposited the price and the price has to be equally divided between the parties. Challenge is in fact to the consent order dated 25.3.2014 and therefore in fact this petition against a consent order does not lie.2. By the order dated 30.1.2014, the trial court recorded the aspects that the preliminary decree dated 20.1.2010 has become final after dismissal of the fir...
Attar Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:3. d December, 2014 + W.P.(C) 2816/2013 ATTAR SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate AND + W.P.(C) 3240/2013 JASWANT SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Central Government Standing Counsel with Mr. S.S. Rai & Ms. Ruchika Mahajan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI JUDGMENT % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. By these writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek a writ of mandamus to the respondents to grant promotion to the petitioners to the rank of Sub-Inspector alongwith seniority and financial benefits from the date their juniors had been promoted; and (ii) a writ of mandamus to the respondents to grant the same relief as granted v...
- ‹ Prev
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- Next ›
- Last »