Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 89 of about 1,089 results (0.023 seconds)Shishir Yadav Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5710/2014 SHISHIR YADAV Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.H.S. Dhaiya, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Hashmat Nabi and Mr. Anuj Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER % 03.12.2014 NAJMI WAZIRI, J (ORAL)1) This petition impugns an order dated 19th November, 2014 whereby the petitioners appointment to the post of Constable/Driver cum Pump Operator in the Central Industrial Security Force (in short CISF) had been cancelled pursuant to the recommendations of the Standing Screening Committee (in short SSC). The petitioners case is that on 7th June, 2013, he was appointed to the post of Constable and was required to report to the CISF Recruits Training Centre at Bhilai Uttai, Distt: Durg, Chhattisgarh. On 6th July, 2013, when he reported for his training, he was not allowed to join the same and was sent back in the context of a criminal case in ...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Spearhead Digital Studio Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Shri H. K. Mitroo
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 1067/2014 3rd December, 2014 % M/S SPEARHEAD DIGITAL STUDIO PVT. LTD. ......Petitioner Through: Mr. Z. Duggal, representative of the petitioner company in person. VERSUS SHRI H. K. MITROO Through: ...... Respondent Mr. P.S. Bindra, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) Caveat No.1073/2014 1. Counsel appears for the caveator and thus the caveat stands discharged. + C.M.(M) No.1067/2014 and C.M. Nos.19879-80/2014 2. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner-company, who is defendant in the suit, impugning the order dated 7.10.2014 by which right of the petitioner/defendant to crossexamine PW-1 was closed. The subsequent paragraphs of this judgment will show that how tenants in Delhi who are occupying the valuable properties, by hook or by crook keep on continuing and dragging the litigation thus causing grave haras...
Tag this Judgment!Sai Lok Kalyan Sanstha Through President Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d December, 2014. % + WP(C) No.3252/2014 SAI LOK KALYAN SANSTHA THROUGH PRESIDENT ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Gautam (in-person) Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC /UOI. Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed as a Public Interest Litigation flags the issue of broadcast of a large number of programmes/advertisements on the television channels based on Astrology, Lal Kitab, Tarot, Numerology, Devi Shakti aur Kripa, by so called self made astrologers, swamiji, panditji, guruji and babaji who promise cures of various ailments on payment of money. Alleging such claims to be not based on any logic and scientific verification and being detrimental to public interest, reliefs of : i. directing the respondents Union...
Tag this Judgment!Anju @ Sonia @ Baby Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : November 18, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : December 03, 2014 + CRL.A.456/2014 ANIL KUMAR Represented by: .....Appellant Ms.Nandita Rao, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: .....Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Satish Kumar Sharma and Insp.N.S.Chauhan CRL.A.199/2014 PREM PAL Represented by: .....Appellant Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: .....Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Satish Kumar Sharma and Insp.N.S.Chauhan CRL.A.393/2014 ANJU @ SONIA @ BABY Represented by: .....Appellant Mr.Joginder Tuli, Advocate with Mr.Tarun Nanda, Mr.Ashu Kumar Sharma and Ms.Pooja Arora, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: .....Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Satish Kumar Sharma and Insp.N.S.Chauhan CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Process of criminal law was set into motion when at around 7:45 PM on February 08, 2007, DD No.52B, ...
Tag this Judgment!State Vs. RiyazuddIn and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 20, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 03, 2014 % + CRL.A. 577/2013 RIYAZUDDIN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Mohit Mathur, Advocate with Mr.Amish Dabas, Mr.Devendra Dedha, Mr.Praman Mathur, Mr.Manoj Pant, Mr.Badar Mehmood, Mr.Pankaj Verma, Ms.Utkarsha Kohli and Ms.Vasudha Datta, Advocates versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Represented by: + ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Inspector Lokender Singh, PS Malviya Nagar Ms.Karuna Chhatwal, Advocate with Mr.Shailendra Babbar, Advocate for Board of Homeopathy. CRL.A. 1155/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Inspector Lokender Singh, PS Malviya Nagar. versus RIYAZUDDIN & ORS. Represented by: Crl.A.No.577 of 2013 & 1155 of 2014 ..... Respondents Mr.Mohit Mathur, Advocate with Mr.Amish Dabas, Mr.Devinder Dedha, Mr.Praman Mathur and Ms.Vasudha Data, Advocates for R-1 Page 1 of 11 Mr.Chander M.Maini, Advocate with Mr.Satyam Chaturved...
Tag this Judgment!United India Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Sunaina and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision :03. 12.2014 MAC.APP. 976/2014 and CM No.17744/2014 (stay) UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K. L. Nandwani, Advocate versus SUNAINA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. By the present appeal, the appellant seeks to impugn the award dated 16.08.2014.2. The brief facts are that on 25.05.2009 Shri Banke Lal was going on a bicycle from Mandawali towards National Highway no.24. When he reached near Khoda Colony, first Pusta a Tata truck driven rashly and negligently came from behind and hit the cyclist due to which the cyclist fell down and suffered grievous injuries and died on the spot.3. Based on the evidence on record, the Tribunal concluded that the accident took place due to rash and negligent driving of the truck.4. On compensation, the tribunal awarded a total compensation of Rs.8,51,200/-. Rs.6,16,200/- ...
Tag this Judgment!Pradeep Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. 10.2014 Date of Decision:03. 12.2014 + WP (C) No.1032 of 2014 PRADEEP SINGH Through: UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ...... Petitioner Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. versus ..... Respondents Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Malaya Kumar Chand & Mr. S.N. Kaul, Advs. for R-1 to 3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.1. In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing and setting aside of the letter/order dated 16.11.2011 issued by respondent No.4, whereby the offer to him of provisional appointment to the post of Assistant Sub Inspector (ASI)/Exe in CISF was withdrawn. The petitioner also seeks a direction to the respondents for conducting his basic training for the said post as well as for fixation of his seniority to just below the person who was immediately above him in the select list as was declared selected for the p...
Tag this Judgment!Ambrose Vs. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 9 of 2014 & CRL. (B) 11 of 2014 AMBROSE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajit Sharma, Amicus Curiae (DHCLSC) with Appellant produced from Judicial custody. versus DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER0312.2014 Introduction 1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 9 th July 2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special JudgeNDPS/ South District, Saket Courts Complex, New Delhi in Sessions Case No.46A/00 convicting the Appellant, Ambrose, for the offence under Section 21 (c) of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for having been found in possession of 19 kg of heroin and the order on sentence dated 20th July 2013 whereby for the aforesaid offence he was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for a period of 10 years and a fine of Rs 1 lakh and in default, to under simple impriso...
Tag this Judgment!Gandharav Saini Vs. Pushpa Sharma and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:09. 05.2014 Date of Decision: _03.12.2014 + Ex.F.A. No.14 of 2009 GANDHARAV SAINI Through: ...... Appellant Mr. Virender K. Singh, Adv. versus PUSHPA SHARMA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. J.K. Sharma & Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advs. for R-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.1. In this Execution First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), the appellant impugns the order of the Executing Court dated 14.10.2009 by which the objections filed by respondent No.1 herein, namely Smt. Pushpa Sharma (objector) were allowed and the judgment and decree dated 23.1.2006 was held to be not binding upon her. As a consequence thereof, possession of the suit premises, being Shop No.P-4, Connaught Place, New Delhi (suit premises) was directed to be restored to the objector.2. The appellants case is that Shri V.B. Sharma, the husband of respondent No.1 was a tenant in the suit premises. Upon his demi...
Tag this Judgment!Virtual Studio Pvt Ltd Vs. Tmt Investment Pte Ltd and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :11. h NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON :3. d DECEMBER, 2014 + CS(OS) 1700/2010 VIRTUAL STUDIO PVT LTD Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.Atul Bhuchhar, Advocate with Mr.Manoj Nagar, Advocate. versus TMT INVESTMENT PTE LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through : Mr.Vivek Malik, Advocate for D-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.I.A.No.2351/2013 (u/S45of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996) 1. The plaintiff company incorporated and established under Companies Act, 1956 was engaged in the business of Web Casting, Live Streaming, Web Design and Interactive Solutions, Films and Presentations. On the recommendation by Microsoft, the defendant No.1 awarded the project of web cast of IPL Season 2, 2009 to the plaintiff vide its PO No.Tmt/0809/09-001, which was signed by defendant No.3 on 10.04.2009 on behalf of the defendant No.1 at the office of the plaintiff at New Delhi at a mutually agreed price of USD $ 69,607.84/-. It is submitted t...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- Next ›
- Last »