Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 90 of about 1,089 results (0.012 seconds)Sandeep Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. 10.2014 Date of Decision:03. 12.2014 + WP (C) No.1029 of 2014 SANDEEP SINGH Through: UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ...... Petitioner Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. versus ..... Respondents Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Malaya Kumar Chand & Mr. S.N. Kaul, Advs. for R-1 to 3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.1. In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing and setting aside of the letter/order dated 23.11.2013 issued by respondent No.4, whereby the offer to him of provisional appointment to the post of Sub Inspector/Exe in CISF was withdrawn. The petitioner also seeks a direction to the respondents for conducting his basic training for the said post as well as for fixation of his seniority to just below the person who was immediately above him in the select list as was declared selected for the post of Sub Inspe...
Tag this Judgment!Amarjeet Singh Sachdeva Vs. Ashok Monga
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. 02.2014 Date of Decision:03. 12.2014 + CM (M) No.1360 of 2012 & CM No.20876 of 2012 AMARJEET SINGH SACHDEVA ...... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja & Mr. Ishaan Chhaya, Advs. versus ASHOK MONGA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.K. Gupta, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.1. By this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner impugns an order dated 5.11.2012 passed in an appeal, which resultantly set aside the order dated 1.8.2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge.2. The case of the petitioner is that the respondent/plaintiff had filed a civil suit seeking reliefs of mandatory and permanent injunction as well as compensation/damages of Rs.1.85 lacs from the petitioner/defendant. The respondent/plaintiff is the exclusive and absolute owner of the third floor of property bearing No.C-10/8B, Krishna Nagar, Delhi-110051 on the basis of a Sale Deed dated 29.6.2011, executed ...
Tag this Judgment!Prem Pal Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : November 18, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : December 03, 2014 + CRL.A.456/2014 ANIL KUMAR Represented by: .....Appellant Ms.Nandita Rao, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: .....Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Satish Kumar Sharma and Insp.N.S.Chauhan CRL.A.199/2014 PREM PAL Represented by: .....Appellant Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: .....Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Satish Kumar Sharma and Insp.N.S.Chauhan CRL.A.393/2014 ANJU @ SONIA @ BABY Represented by: .....Appellant Mr.Joginder Tuli, Advocate with Mr.Tarun Nanda, Mr.Ashu Kumar Sharma and Ms.Pooja Arora, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: .....Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Satish Kumar Sharma and Insp.N.S.Chauhan CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Process of criminal law was set into motion when at around 7:45 PM on February 08, 2007, DD No.52B, ...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Sachinder Mohan Mehta Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on November 25, 2014 Judgment delivered on December 03, 2014 + ITA6552014 SHRI SACHINDER MOHAN MEHTA Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Manu K.Giri, Adv. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Through: .....Respondent Ms.Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr.Standing Counsel CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. This appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, in short) has been filed by the appellant-assessee against the order dated April 04, 2014 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench (Tribunal, in short) dismissing the appeal ITA No.839/Del./2013 filed by the assessee for the Assessment Year 200910.2. The brief facts are, the assessee, an Architect by profession, purchased a floor of property being E-215, East of Kailash, New Delhi in the month of July 1997, in terms of an unregistered agreement of sale for Rs. 18 lakhs. According to the appellant-ass...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Shoki Chaudhary Vs. Sh. Mukesh
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.121/2014 3rd December , 2014 % SH. SHOKI CHAUDHARY Through: ......Petitioner Ms. Seema Gupta, Adv. VERSUS SH. MUKESH Through: ...... Respondent Mr. Jitender Kumar and Mr. Keshav Yadav, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the tenant impugning the judgments of the courts below; of the Rent Controller dated 16.5.2013 and the Additional Rent Control Tribunal dated 5.12.2013; by which the eviction petition of the landlord filed under Section 14(1) (a) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short DRC Act) has been decreed and now the case is fixed for further proceedings to find out as to whether the petitioner/tenant has complied with the order of deposit of rent under Section 15(1) of the DRC Act. It must be noted that in case of first default, and the present is the case of first...
Tag this Judgment!Praveen Kumar Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. 10.2014 Date of Decision:03. 12.2014 + WP (C) No.1028 of 2014 PRAVEEN KUMAR Through: ...... Petitioner Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Malaya Kumar Chand & Mr. S.N. Kaul, Advs. for R-1 to 3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.1. In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing and setting aside of the letter/order dated 23.11.2013 issued by respondent No.4, whereby the offer to him of provisional appointment to the post of Sub Inspector/Exe in CISF was withdrawn. The petitioner also seeks a direction to the respondents for conducting his basic training for the said post as well as for fixation of his seniority to just below the person who was immediately above him in the select list as was declared selected for the post of Sub Inspe...
Tag this Judgment!Deepa Tomar Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. 10.2014 Date of Decision:03. 12.2014 + WP (C) No.1051 of 2014 DEEPA TOMAR Through: ...... Petitioner Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Malaya Kumar Chand & Mr. S.N. Kaul, Advs. for R-1 to 3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.1. In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing and setting aside of the letter/order dated 18.11.2011 issued by respondent No.4, whereby the offer to her of provisional appointment to the post of Assistant Sub Inspector (ASI)/Exe in CISF was withdrawn. The petitioner also seeks a direction to the respondents for conducting her basic training for the said post as well as for fixation of her seniority to just below the person who was immediately above her in the select list as was declared selected for the pos...
Tag this Judgment!RiyazuddIn Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 20, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 03, 2014 % + CRL.A. 577/2013 RIYAZUDDIN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Mohit Mathur, Advocate with Mr.Amish Dabas, Mr.Devendra Dedha, Mr.Praman Mathur, Mr.Manoj Pant, Mr.Badar Mehmood, Mr.Pankaj Verma, Ms.Utkarsha Kohli and Ms.Vasudha Datta, Advocates versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Represented by: + ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Inspector Lokender Singh, PS Malviya Nagar Ms.Karuna Chhatwal, Advocate with Mr.Shailendra Babbar, Advocate for Board of Homeopathy. CRL.A. 1155/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Inspector Lokender Singh, PS Malviya Nagar. versus RIYAZUDDIN & ORS. Represented by: Crl.A.No.577 of 2013 & 1155 of 2014 ..... Respondents Mr.Mohit Mathur, Advocate with Mr.Amish Dabas, Mr.Devinder Dedha, Mr.Praman Mathur and Ms.Vasudha Data, Advocates for R-1 Page 1 of 11 Mr.Chander M.Maini, Advocate with Mr.Satyam Chaturved...
Tag this Judgment!Anil Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : November 18, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : December 03, 2014 + CRL.A.456/2014 ANIL KUMAR Represented by: .....Appellant Ms.Nandita Rao, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: .....Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Satish Kumar Sharma and Insp.N.S.Chauhan CRL.A.199/2014 PREM PAL Represented by: .....Appellant Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: .....Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Satish Kumar Sharma and Insp.N.S.Chauhan CRL.A.393/2014 ANJU @ SONIA @ BABY Represented by: .....Appellant Mr.Joginder Tuli, Advocate with Mr.Tarun Nanda, Mr.Ashu Kumar Sharma and Ms.Pooja Arora, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: .....Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Satish Kumar Sharma and Insp.N.S.Chauhan CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Process of criminal law was set into motion when at around 7:45 PM on February 08, 2007, DD No.52B, ...
Tag this Judgment!Sarvesh Bisaria Vs. Uoi and Ors
Court: Delhi
-* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d December, 2014. + W.P.(C) 8502/2014 SARVESH BISARIA Through: ..... Petitioner Petitioner-in-person. Versus UOI AND ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC, Ms. Pallavi Shali & Ms. Kritika, Advs. for UOI. Mr. R.V. Sinha with Mr. A.S. Singh, Advs. for R-3/CVC. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeks the following relief:It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that Your Lordships may graciously be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ, order or directions to the respondents to treat the CAG Annual Reports are (sic for as) complaint/reference in terms of the provisions of CVC Act and Lok Pal and Lokayuktas Act and proceed further in accordance with the said statute in a time bound manner, or m...
Tag this Judgment!