Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ankur Muterja Vs. Public Grievance Commission and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:24. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 4641/2013 ANKUR MUTERJA ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner-in-person. versus PUBLIC GRIEVANCE COMMISSION AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner before this Court claims to be in possession of a portion of House No. 156, Gagan Vihar, Delhi. One S.N. Singhal filed a grievance petition before Public Grievance Commission, alleging unauthorized encroachment on public land by construction of House No. 156 of Gagan Vihar Extension towards south side, thereby blocking the pedestrian passage on the disused canal road. Gagan Vihar Extension is an unauthorized colony. Vide its letter dated 12.11.2012, the Commission requested the Chief Engineer, PWD to ascertain the nature of the problem of the petitioner and take corrective measures under law, for resolving the same. The petitioner before this Court wrote a letter dated 06.01.2013 to ...
Khem Verma and anr. Vs. University of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.8462/2008 24th July, 2013 % KHEM VERMA & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. N.K. Khetrapal, Mr. S.N. Mathur, Advocates. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms. Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for Ms. Amitesh Kumar, Advocate for the respondent/UGC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Petitioners by means of this writ petition seek regularization of the services with the respondent No.1/University of Delhi.2. Petitioners were appointed as Technical Assistant and Office Attendant in terms of selection letters dated 19.5.1999. When we refer to these letters, admittedly, these letters show that the appointments of the petitioners were as temporary employees.3. No doubt, the appointment of the petitioners continued after the original period of about 3 years because the plan/scheme/project unde...
A.K.JaIn Vs. Punjab National Bank and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % A.K.JAIN W.P.(C) No. 2555/2012 Through:24. h July, 2013 ......Petitioner Ms. Vandana Sharma, Mr. A.S.Kushwaha and Mr. Samundra Jain, Adv. VERSUS PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ANR. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Jagat Arora, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner Sh. A.K.Jain by means of this writ petition seeks the relief of grant of pension by the employer/respondent no.1/Punjab National Bank.2. The facts of the present case are that the petitioner did not voluntarily retire because though he had initially applied for voluntary retirement, subsequently, as he had not completed 20 years of service and hence was not eligible for voluntary retirement, he resigned from the respondent no.1/bank 14th June, 97 Senior Manager Punjab National Bank GAD HO: NEW DELHI Dear Sir, In reference to my letter dated 7.5.97 for voluntary retirement and your reply dated 13.6.9...
Cit Vs. Ajay Kapoor
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h July, 2013 + ITA 155/2011 CIT Through ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal, Sr. Standing Counsel. Versus AJAY KAPOOR Through ..... Respondent Mr. Kaanan Kapur, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(Oral) This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) raises the following the substantial question of law:Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right and not perverse in holding that no addition should be made on account of unrecorded purchases and sales as unaccounted income of Rs.21,90,685/- has been brought to tax? 2. The impugned order passed by the tribunal is dated 16 th April, 2010 and relates to the block period ending 6th November, 2001.3. Search and seizure action under Section 132 of the Act was carried out in the residential and office premises of respondentassessee on 6th November, 2011. The resp...
Jagwanti Vs. Lt. Governor Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :16. 07.2013 Judgment pronounced on :24. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 6065/2010 JAGWANTI ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Anand Yadav with Ms. Anita Tomar, Advs. Versus LT. GOVERNOR NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Through .... Respondents Ms. Shawana Bari for Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Advs. for respondents no.1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.The petitioner claims to be the owner of land measuring 1 bigha and 8 biswas out of Khasra No.78/9 min. (0-12) and Khasra no.78/10 min (0-16) situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Ladpur, Delhi. The said Khasras are stated to be on the village phirni. According to the petitioner, he is using the said land by constructing a dwelling house and for other purposes, required in the rural areas. According to the petitioner, if village phirni/ laldora is extended in the consolidation proceedings of the aforesaid village, these khasras would be part of the extended abadi/laldora, they being adjacent...
Deepak Gupta Vs. Sushma Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :1. t July, 2013 Judgment pronounced on:24. h July, 2013 % + RC.REV. 180/2013 DEEPAK GUPTA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.J.P.Sengh, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Anil Kumar Pruthi, Mr.Anuj Rajvanshi & Mr.Luvenish Mendiratta, Advs. versus SUSHMA AGGARWAL Through ..... Respondent Mr.Anuj Jain, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order, I shall dispose of the revision petition filed under Section 25 B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 by the petitioner assailing the judgment and order dated 5th January, 2013 passed by the learned Rent Controller in the case not E-48/12 filed by the respondent herein against the petitioner and his sister Poonam Gupta wherein the petitioner was declined the leave to defend in the proceedings and eviction order was passed as a consequence.2. The brief facts leading uptil filing of the present petition can be enunciated as under: i) The respondent herein had filed a p...
M/S Brite Aricon (Consortium) and anr Vs. Airports Authority of India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:24. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 4583/2013 M/S BRITE ARICON (CONSORTIUM) & ANR ..... Petitioners Through:Ms.Anusuya Salwan, Advocate versus AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Digvijay Rai, Standing Counsel for the respondent/Airport Authority of India. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) A Consortium named M/s Brite Aricon(Consortium) consisting of two companies M/s B.R. Arora and Associates Private Limited and M/s Aricon Developers Private Limited entered into a contract with the respondent Airports Authority of India for the work of expansion of apron, construction of additional taxi way, extension of runway and allied works at Varanasi Airport. The work was required to be completed by 11th March, 2009 and according to the petitioner, the said work was completed to the satisfaction of the respondents on 20 th August, 2010 and a certificate dated 11th December, 2010 in this regar...
Ferrero Spa and anr. Vs. Mahendra Dugar and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2013
$~* 10 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) 233 of 2012 FERRERO SPA & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Vaishali Mittal and Ms. Nupur Kumar, Advocates versus MAHENDRA DUGAR & ANR. Through: None ..... Defendants CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % ORDER 24 07.2013 1. Ferrero SPA and Ferrero India Pvt. Ltd. [FIPL], Plaintiffs 1 and 2 respectively, have filed this suit against Mr. Mahendra Dugar and Maxsweet Foodstuffs Co. Ltd., China, Defendant Nos.1 and 2 respectively, seeking a permanent injunction restraining the Defendants from infringing the Plaintiffs registered trademarks, including trade dress, FERRERO ROCHER and from passing off the Defendants goods as the Plaintiffs FERRERO ROCHER chocolate specialities. An incidental prayer for damages has also been sought.2. Plaintiff No.1 was founded by founded by Pietro Ferrero in 1946. He is stated to have concocted innovative products in his small pastry shop which grew to become a factory and later a worldwide success story. Pla...
Hemant Gulati Vs. Chandan JaIn and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. h July, 2013 % + CM(M) No.1293/2011 & C.M. No.20114/2011 HEMANT GULATI Through ..Petitioner Mr.V.K. Gulati, Adv. versus CHANDAN JAIN & ORS ..Respondents Through Mr.N.K. Jain, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner Hemant Gulati in the above said matter has filed the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 29th August, 2011 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Patiala House Court, New Delhi, in Suit No.124/2010, whereby the application under Section 151 CPC filed by the respondent for striking out the defence of the petitioner on the grounds that the petitioner had not complied with the orders of payment of rent and deliberately flouting the orders of the Court.2. It is the admitted position that the respondent filed suit for possession and recovery of arrears of rent and mesne profits against the petitioner. By order...
Ram Chander and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2013
$~3 & 4 (Common Order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6632/2011 Date of decision:24. h July, 2013. % RAM CHANDER AND ORS. Through : ..... Petitioners Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Tinu Bajma, Ms.Sahilla Lamba and Mr.Amandeep Joshi, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through : ..... Respondents Mr.Arvind Kumar Shukla, Mr.Alok Shukla, Mr.Shivom Tandon and Mr.Shivanshu Bajpai, Advocates. AND + W.P.(C) 7756/2011 KRISHAN KUMAR Through : ..... Petitioner Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Tinu Bajma, Ms.Sahilla Lamba and Mr.Amandeep Joshi, Advocates versus UOI AND ORS Through : ..... Respondents Mr.Arvind Kumar Shukla, Mr.Alok Shukla, Mr.Shivom Tandon and Mr.Shivanshu Bajpai, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J (Oral) 1. These writ petitions emanate from the common incident which occurred in the night intervening 1/2-07-2006 in Train No.8237 up Chattisgarh Express from New Delhi Railway Station to Jaland...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »