Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raju Jamadar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement Reserved On: July 18, 2013 Judgement Delivered On: July 23, 2013 + CRL.A. 280/1998 RAJU JAMADAR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Arun Kumar Srivastava, Advocate with Ms.Shalini Mediratta, Advocate. Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate, DHCLSC. versus STATE ..... Respondent Mr.Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl.). Represented by: CRL.A. 507/1998 RAJU SWAMI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vikas Gupta, Advocate with Ms.Swati Sukla, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl.) CRL.A. 598/1999 KAMAL KISHORE Represented by: Crl.A.280/98 & conn.matters .... Appellant Mr.Arun Kumar Srivastava, Advocate with Ms.Shalini Mediratta, versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl.) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The three appellants, Raju Swami @ Raju Madrasi, Raju Jamadar and Kamal Kishor...
M/S Ashima Securities Private Limited Vs. Municipal Corporation of Del ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: Pronounced on : + 19.07.2013 23.07.2013 IA No.9956/2013 in CS(OS) 1713/2007 M/S ASHIMA SECURITIES PRIVATE LIMITED Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Mr. Harpreet Singh and Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocates versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI ..... Defendant Through Ms. Maninder Acharya, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amitesh Kumar and Ms. Puja Kalra, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.9956/2013 1. This is an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC seeking ad interim injunction and the following reliefs:(I) Allow the present application and pass an ex parte stay order thereby restraining the defendant from proceeding with their act in furtherance of their notice of June 2013 inviting tenders for allotment of the suit property on license fee basis to a third party during the pendency of the suit. (II) Consequently stay the notice of June 2013 issued by the d...
Kurmanchal Institute of Degree and Diploma Enginee Vs. the Indira Gand ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on Judgment pronounced on :10. 07.2013 :23. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 5789/2012 & CM Nos. 11883/12, 19116/12, 19217/12 HINDUSTAN AVIATION ACADEMY Through ..... Petitioner/ Mr. Roopansh Purohit, Adv. Versus THE INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY .... Respondent + Through Mr. Aly Mirza, Adv. W.P.(C) 6016/2012 & CM Nos.12378/2012, 19118 and 19218/12 INDIAN INSTITUTE FOR AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ORS..... Petitioners Through Mr. Roopansh Purohit, Adv. Versus THE INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY .... Respondent Through + Mr. Aly Mirza, Adv. W.P.(C) 6021/2012 & CM Nos.12388/12 & 19117-19/12 DEHRADUN INSTITUTE FOR AEROSPACE ENGINEERING. .... Petitioners Through Mr. Roopansh Purohit, Adv. Versus THE INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY .... Respondent Through W.P(C) No. 5789/2012 & Others + W.P.(C) 6399/2012 & CM Nos.17043/2012 & 19224/2012 AGRAGMI VSM INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY ....
Pankaj Dhiman Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +W.P.(CRL) 1455/2012 & Crl.M.A.Nos. 17692/2012 & 557/2013 Date of Decision:23. d July, 2013 PANKAJ DHIMAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Shailendra Bhardwaj and Ms.Aromas Bhardwaj, Advocates. versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Yashpal Rangi, Advocate for R-1&2 CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. By virtue of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India r/w Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.43 dated 29 th November, 2011 registered under Section 498A/406/326/506/34 IPC at PS Mahila Thana, Sonepat primarily on the ground that the alleged crime was committed outside the jurisdiction of Sonepat police and the Sonepat police, at the most, should have transferred it to the concerned Police Station in Delhi for necessary action.2. In the reply by way of affidavit filed by respondents No. 1 & 2, an objection was t...
Agragmi Vsm Institute of Aerospace Engineering Tec Vs. the Indira Gand ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on Judgment pronounced on :10. 07.2013 :23. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 5789/2012 & CM Nos. 11883/12, 19116/12, 19217/12 HINDUSTAN AVIATION ACADEMY Through ..... Petitioner/ Mr. Roopansh Purohit, Adv. Versus THE INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY .... Respondent + Through Mr. Aly Mirza, Adv. W.P.(C) 6016/2012 & CM Nos.12378/2012, 19118 and 19218/12 INDIAN INSTITUTE FOR AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ORS..... Petitioners Through Mr. Roopansh Purohit, Adv. Versus THE INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY .... Respondent Through + Mr. Aly Mirza, Adv. W.P.(C) 6021/2012 & CM Nos.12388/12 & 19117-19/12 DEHRADUN INSTITUTE FOR AEROSPACE ENGINEERING. .... Petitioners Through Mr. Roopansh Purohit, Adv. Versus THE INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY .... Respondent Through W.P(C) No. 5789/2012 & Others + W.P.(C) 6399/2012 & CM Nos.17043/2012 & 19224/2012 AGRAGMI VSM INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY ....
Hindustan Aviation Academy Vs. the Indira Gandhi National Open Univers ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on Judgment pronounced on :10. 07.2013 :23. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 5789/2012 & CM Nos. 11883/12, 19116/12, 19217/12 HINDUSTAN AVIATION ACADEMY Through ..... Petitioner/ Mr. Roopansh Purohit, Adv. Versus THE INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY .... Respondent + Through Mr. Aly Mirza, Adv. W.P.(C) 6016/2012 & CM Nos.12378/2012, 19118 and 19218/12 INDIAN INSTITUTE FOR AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ORS..... Petitioners Through Mr. Roopansh Purohit, Adv. Versus THE INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY .... Respondent Through + Mr. Aly Mirza, Adv. W.P.(C) 6021/2012 & CM Nos.12388/12 & 19117-19/12 DEHRADUN INSTITUTE FOR AEROSPACE ENGINEERING. .... Petitioners Through Mr. Roopansh Purohit, Adv. Versus THE INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY .... Respondent Through W.P(C) No. 5789/2012 & Others + W.P.(C) 6399/2012 & CM Nos.17043/2012 & 19224/2012 AGRAGMI VSM INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY ....
Union of India Vs. H.S.Roorkiwal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on July 11, 2013 Judgment Delivered on July 23, 2013 + W.P.(C) 5245/2012 UNION OF INDIA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.R.V.Sinha, Advocate versus H.S.ROORKIWAL AND ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.G.S.Lobana, Advocate with Mr.Deepak Verma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The writ petition has been filed by the petitioners inter alia praying for quashing the order and judgment dated February 3, 2012 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench in Review Application being No. 213 of 2011 and Original Application being No. 2754 of 2009 wherein the learned Tribunal has held that the respondent No.1 would be entitled to his normal pension with effect from his date of retirement and the amount of pension deducted so far shall be refunded to the respondent No.1 forthwith.2. The respondent No.1 in the instant writ petit...
Ranjana Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : April 18, 2013 DECIDED ON : July 23, 2013 + CRL.A.984/2011 RANJANA Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Gaurav Kumar, Advocate. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Ranjana (the appellant) impugns a judgment dated 05.04.2010 in Sessions Case No.52/2009 arising out of FIR No.118/2004 registered at police station Gokalpuri by which she was convicted for offences punishable under Sections 304 part II/201 IPC and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for six years with total fine `3,000/-.2. Daily Diary (DD) No.8A was recorded at 12.00 (noon) on 22.03.2004 at Police Statoin Gokalpuri on getting information about recovery of body in a house at A-block, Gali No.1, Rama Garden, Karawal Nagar, Delhi. The investigation was assigned to ASI Tara Dutt who with Constable Harinder Singh reached the spot. The investigation was taken over by PW-11 (SI Amul Tyagi) who wit...
Umesh Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 4603/2013 23rd July, 2013 UMESH KUMAR Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Soumya Chakraborty, Adv. and Mr. Anas Tanwar, Adv. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. Amrit Pal Singh, CGSC and Mr. Gurjinder Kaur, Adv. for R-1,2 and 5. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner Sh. Umesh Kumar effectively seeking continuation of his tenure as Member (Finance) with respondent no.3/Damodar Valley Corporation as Financial Advisor.2. Petitioner was appointed as a Financial Advisor with the respondent No.3 by the order/letter dated 7.9.2009 read with notification dated 30.9.2009 for a period of five years or till further orders. Entitlement of any person to continue in a post ordinarily can only be if there is an order of a specific/fixed tenure appointment. W.P.(C) No. 4603/2013 If there is no fixed tenure of ...
Fena Limited Vs. M/S Fina Europe S.a and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.S. (OS) No. 706/2000 Date of Decision:22. 07.2013 FENA LIMITED ....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sachin Gupta, Mr. Shashi Ojha, Advs. Versus ...Defendants M/S FINA EUROPE S.A & ORS Through: Mr. Sushant Singh, Mr. P. C. Arya, Mr. V. K. Shukla, Mr. Rupesh Pandey, Mr. Tejinder Singh, Ms. Geetika Kapur, Ms. Parveen Arya, Advs. For D1 and D2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.1. The plaintiff has filed this suit seeking reliefs of permanent injunction restraining passing off and unfair competition, rendition of accounts and delivery up of all goods bearing the trade mark/trade name FINA.2. The plaintiff, Fena Ltd. is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 having its office at New Delhi. The plaintiffs case is that it is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling various consumer non-durables including detergent cakes & powder, cleaning preparation, etc. since 1976, of which, the detergent sold under the trade name/tr...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »