Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Developmen Vs. Ashok Kumar M ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:24. 07.2013 + LPA 3/2013 DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Appellant versus ASHOK KUMAR MADAN ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Ms Revika Arora For the Respondent : Mr R.S. Kela CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J 1.This is an appeal filed by the Delhi State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited against the order dated 03.07.2012 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition being W.P.(C) 8478/2010. The learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent and quashed the letter dated 30.01.2008 issued by the appellant cancelling the allotment of a plot in favour of the respondent.2. The respondent was engaged in the business of manufacturing photo albums at the premises bearing no. 153, Rishi Nagar, Ran...
Hemant Gulati Vs. Chandan JaIn and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. h July, 2013 % + CM(M) No.1293/2012 & C.M. No.20114/2011 HEMANT GULATI Through ..Petitioner Mr.V.K. Gulati, Adv. versus CHANDAN JAIN & ORS ..Respondents Through Mr.N.K. Jain, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner Hemant Gulati in the above said matter has filed the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 29th August, 2011 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Patiala House Court, New Delhi, in Suit No.124/2010, whereby the application under Section 151 CPC filed by the respondent for striking out the defence of the petitioner on the grounds that the petitioner had not complied with the orders of payment of rent and deliberately flouting the orders of the Court.2. It is the admitted position that the respondent filed suit for possession and recovery of arrears of rent and mesne profits against the petitioner. By order...
Raj Ballabh Vs. State (Gnct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl. A. 476/2004 Date of Decision:24. h July, 2013 RAJ BALLABH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Manoj Singh, Advocate. versus STATE (GNCT) DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Fizani Husain, APP CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Insanity of the appellant, at the time of commission of offence, is the main plea that has been urged for reversing the conviction and sentence in question.2. The appeal against the conviction and sentence has been filed by the appellant Raj Bhallabh in Sessions Case No. 83/2003 arising out of FIR 62/2003 under Section 307, PS Darya Ganj, in which he has been convicted for offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Crl. A.476.2004 Page 1 of 22 Code (for short `IPC) and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months.3. The findings of guilt has b...
Anil Kumar Vs. Sardari Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: July 24, 2013 + RC. Rev. No.445/2012 & C.M.No.15240/2012 ANIL KUMAR Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Rajesh Ranjan, Adv. versus SARDARI LAL Through ..... Respondent Mr.Ajay Khatana, Adv. with Mr.Kuldeep Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present petition is filed by the Petitioner under Section 25(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 for an order or a direction thereby setting aside the order and judgment dated 15th May 2012 passed by Shri. Devender Kumar Jangala, Additional Rent Controller (North-West), Rohini Courts, Delhi in E No. 75 of 2011 whereby the ARC dismissed the leave to defend application of the Petitioner and allowed the eviction petition of the Respondent under Section 14(1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.2. The Respondent, aged 83, is the owner of Property bearing No. 1864, Gali No. 19, (Old Gali No. 139), Shanti Nagar, Tri Nagar, New Delhi110035 and the Pet...
Pushpa Kumari Vs. University of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:24. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 4363/2013 PUSHPA KUMARI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr M.C. Dhingra and Mr Arvind Kr. Singh, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. An entrance examination called NEET PG, 2013 was conducted by National Board of Examination (NBE) for admission to MD/MS courses. The petitioner was declared not qualified in the communication sent on her e-mail address. Later a revised list of the qualified candidates was declared, but the revised result was not communicated to the petitioner. In the meanwhile on 15.01.2013, University of Delhi came out with its brochure for admission to MD/MS courses, requiring submission of applications to Delhi University, on or before 12.02.2013. The brochure permitted the applicants to submit the admission the admission form, without waiting for declaration of NEET ...
Krishak Bharti Cooperative Limited Vs. Additional Commissioner of Inco ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 07.2013 ITA No. 1248/2010 KRISHAK BHARTI COOPERATIVE LIMITED Appellant Respondent versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr S. Ganesh, Sr Advocate with Ms Surekha Raman, Mr Varun Singh and Mr Purushottam Kumar Jha For the Respondent : Mr Rohit Madan Kumar, Ms Pushpa Sharma WITH + ITA No. 614/2011 KRISHAK BHARTI COOPERATIVE LIMITED Appellant versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr S. Ganesh, Sr Advocate with Ms Surekha Raman, Mr Varun Singh and Mr Purushottam Kumar Jha For the Respondent : Mr Rohit Madan Kumar, Ms Pushpa Sharma CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACJ 1.These appeals pertain to the assessment years 1993-94 and 1994-95. ITA No.1248/2010, which relates to the assessment year 1993-94, has ...
Vishnu Pal Singh Vs. Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corp ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 07.2013 LPA 471/2013 VISHNU PAL SINGH ..... Appellant versus DELHI TOURISM AND TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION .Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Bharat Bhushan. For the Respondent : None. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J 1.This is an appeal filed by the Vishnu Pal Singh seeking to challenge the order dated 04.04.2013 passed by a learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.5331/2012. By the order dated 04.04.2013 impugned in the present proceedings, a learned Single Judge of this Court has vacated the ad interim order passed on 14.09.2012 staying the departmental inquiry initiated against the appellant. By the order dated 04.04.2013, the learned Single Judge has permitted the continuation of departmental proceedings, albeit, with a condition that any order passed pursuant to the departmental proceed...
Hridaya Bhushan and ors. Vs. Netaji Subhash Institute of Technology an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :22. 07.2013 Judgment pronounced on :24. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 4594/2013 HRIDAYA BHUSHAN & ORS. Through .... Petitioners Mr. Deepak A. Masih with Ms. Esha Dogra, Advs. Versus NETAJI SUBHASH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & ANR. .... Respondents Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.The petitioner no.2 before this Court applied to the respondentNetaji Subhash Institute of Technology for admission to B.E. Course for the academic year 2013-2014. The brochure issued by the said institute for the academic session 2013-2014 provides inter alia reservation for the children of Ex-servicemen/ serving personnel of the Defence/ Armed Forces and all Police Personnel who are in receipt of gallantry defence awards. The relevant clause contained in the brochure in this regard reads as under:4. Reservations The aforesaid allocation of seats carries the following categories of reservations: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) xxxx xxxx xxxx...
Aaa Portfolios Pvt. Ltd and ors. Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Income ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 07.2013 W.P.(C) No.1272/2013 AAA PORTFOLIOS PVT. LTD & ORS. ..... Petitioners . Respondents versus THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Mr Simran Mehta, Mr R.M. Mehta, Ms Yogita Sunaria and Ms Mahima Gupta For the Respondent : Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal and Mr Puneet Gupta for R-1. Mr Sumit Bansal and Mr Ateev Mathur for R-2. Mr Y.K. Kapur for R-3. CORAM:HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J 1.This is a writ petition filed by the petitioners challenging the order dated 01.02.2013 passed by Respondent no.1 (hereinafter referred to as the Assessing Officer) and the consequential notice dated 04.02.2013 issued under Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act,1961 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"). The petitioners are aggrieved on account of the act...
Gitarattan International Business School Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indrapr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:24. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 4472/2013 GITARATTAN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS SCHOOL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr P.D. Gupta, Adv. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY... Respondents Through: Mr Mukul Talwar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner before this Court is imparting business and technical education in various disciplines and is affiliated to Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University. Vide application dated 24.12.2012, the petitioner applied to the respondent-University inter alia for starting MCA (Dual Degree) course with intake capacity of 60 students. The said course has duration of five years and the candidates taking admission in the said course have an option to quit after three years and in that case, degree of BCA is awarded to them. Similarly, the petitioner also applied to Department of Technical Education, Government of NCT of Delhi for revalidation of LOC ...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »