Delhi Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri Siddharth Grover Vs. Smt. Kusma Devi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:9. h November, 2012 Pronounced on:15. h January, 2013 + MAC.APP. 159/2005 SHRI SIDDHARTH GROVER Through: Mr. Ashok Popli, Adv. ...... Appellant versus + SMT. KUSMA DEVI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-5/Insurance Company. MAC.APP. 174/2005 SHRI SIDDHARTH GROVER Through: Mr. Ashok Popli, Adv. ...... Appellant versus SMT. DROPTI DEVI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-4/Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. A very short question arises for consideration in these two Appeals, that is, whether the Respondent New India Assurance Company Limited proved the breach of the terms and conditions of the policy on the part of the insured so as to avoid its liability.2. By the impugned judgment while awarding compensation in the two Claim Petitions,in favour of the Claimants the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) granted recov...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Avtar Singh and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC. Appl. No. 197/2011 % Judgment reserved on:10. h January, 2013 Judgment delivered on:15. h January, 2013 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vineet Malhotra and Mr. Vishal Gohri, Adv. versus AVTAR SINGH & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. J.N. Aggarwal, Adv. for R3 & R4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the instant appeal appellant has challenged the award dated 13.12.2010 passed by the ld. Tribunal in case no. 478/2009.2. The appellant has filed the present appeal on the ground that ld. Tribunal failed to appreciate the material available on record and erred in granting unjust and excessive compensation.3. The ld. Tribunal failed to appreciate that respondent no. 1 / claimant did not suffer permanent disability of 80% of his whole body. The said Tribunal wrongly interpreted the opinion of the Medical Board and construed 80% disability of right lower limb to the 80% of the whole body.4...
Maninder Singh Narula Vs. Pawan Kumar Ralli
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:3. d January, 2013 Pronounced on:15. h January, 2013 + CRL. M.C. 2961/2012 MANINDER SINGH NARULA ...... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manish Miglani, Adv. versus PAWAN KUMAR RALLI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Amit Bajpai, Adv. along with Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. By virtue of this Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) the Petitioner seeks quashing of the criminal complaint case No.819/2012 and the summoning order dated 12.07.2012 passed by the Learned Metropolitan Magistrate (MM), Karkardooma Court, Delhi.2. Before adverting to the grounds raised in the Petition, I would in brief narrate the facts leading to the filing of the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the N.I.Act). According to the Respondent (the Complainant before the MM), three cheques for `30 lacs, 20 lacs and ...
Harminder Singh and ors. Vs. State of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h January, 2013 + W.P.(CRL) 1748/2012 HARMINDER SINGH & ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Viraj S. Datar, Adv. with Mr. Surinder Singh, Adv. versus STATE OF DELHI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State with Ms. Richa Oberio, Adv. Mr. S.Saravanan, Addl. DCP/NW. Inspector Dinesh Kumar, PS Bharat Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. By virtue of this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners seek protection of their life and liberty and transfer of the investigation of FIR No.267 dated 06.12.2012 registered in Police Station Bharat Nagar. This Court by an order dated 14.12.2012 directed the police to summon the Petitioners for investigation in the manner as indicated in the order. The learned counsel for the Petitioners states that in view of the directions given to the police, the Petitioners do not press their prayer A ...
Sudharshan Singh Dhariwal Vs. R L Kukreja
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2013
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3986/2012 SUDARSHAN SINGH DHARIWAL ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Gurvinder Singh, Adv. versus R L KUKREJA ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR ORDER 15 01.2013 % 1. By this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks quashing of complaint case NO. 65/1/11 pending before the Court of learned ACMM, Tis Hazari District Courts, Delhi.2. Addressing arguments, counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated by the complainant/respondent as the petitioner who was admittedly the owner of the property bearing no. A-1/200, Janak Puri, New Delhi had cancelled the power of attorney vide cancellation deed dated 27.9.2002. Counsel also submits that Mr. Tony Talwar in whose favour the petitioner had earlier executed the special power of attorney and later on whose power of attorney was cancelled by the petitioner had died in the year 2005. Counsel further submit...
Union of India Vs. Manjit Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA 42/2013 and CM Nos. 796/2013 (stay), 797/2013 (exemption), 798/2013 (filing additional documents) and 799/2013 (delay in filing 424 days) and Caveat No. 38/2013 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr Sachin Datta, CGSE versus MANJIT SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms Jyoti Singh, Sr Adv with Mr Sanjeev Kumar and Ms Tinu and Ms Sahila Lamba, Advs. AND + LPA 43/2013 and CM No. 800/2013 (stay), 801/2013 (exemption), 802/2013 (Placing on record additional documents) and 803/2013 (delay of 1 day) UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr Sachin Datta, CGSE versus MANJIT SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms Jyoti Singh, Sr Adv with Mr Sanjeev Kumar and Ms Tinu and Ms Sahila Lamba, Advs. LPA 4.& 43 of 2013 page 1 of 11 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER 15 01.2013 % WP(C) No. 2764/2001 was filed by Technical Assistants working in Indian ...
Manoj Tibrewal Aakash Vs. Harikesh Bahadur Singh Gautam and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: January 15, 2013 + W.P.(C) 6859/2010 PRASAR BHARTI ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Sachin Chopra, Mr.Anuj Tyagi, Mr.Sarvpreet S.Chawla, Advs. versus HARIKESH BS GAUTAM AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sanjai Kr.Pathak, Adv. for R-1. None for R-2. Mr.Harish Garg, Adv. for R-3. Mr.V.K.Tandon & Ms.Aakanksha Munjhal, Advs. for R-4 to R-25 & R-27 to R-29. Mr.Prem Kumar with Mr.Ashish Kumar Sharma & Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Advs. for R-26. AND + W.P.(C) 7813/2010 YASHVI TIRATH ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Prem Kumar with Mr.Ashish Kumar Sharma & Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Advs. versus UOI AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: R.V.Sinha with Mr.A.S.Singh & Ms.Sangita Rai, Advs. for R-1. Mr.Sachin Chopra, Mr.Anuj Tyagi, Mr.Sarvpreet S.Chawla, Advs. for R-2 & R-3. Mr.Harish Garg, Adv. for R-4. Mr.Sanjai Kr.Pathak, Adv. for R-5. AND + W.P.(C) 1481/2011 JAYA SINHA AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Adv. v...
Jaya Sinha and ors Vs. Harikesh Bahadur Singh Gautam and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: January 15, 2013 + W.P.(C) 6859/2010 PRASAR BHARTI ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Sachin Chopra, Mr.Anuj Tyagi, Mr.Sarvpreet S.Chawla, Advs. versus HARIKESH BS GAUTAM AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sanjai Kr.Pathak, Adv. for R-1. None for R-2. Mr.Harish Garg, Adv. for R-3. Mr.V.K.Tandon & Ms.Aakanksha Munjhal, Advs. for R-4 to R-25 & R-27 to R-29. Mr.Prem Kumar with Mr.Ashish Kumar Sharma & Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Advs. for R-26. AND + W.P.(C) 7813/2010 YASHVI TIRATH ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Prem Kumar with Mr.Ashish Kumar Sharma & Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Advs. versus UOI AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: R.V.Sinha with Mr.A.S.Singh & Ms.Sangita Rai, Advs. for R-1. Mr.Sachin Chopra, Mr.Anuj Tyagi, Mr.Sarvpreet S.Chawla, Advs. for R-2 & R-3. Mr.Harish Garg, Adv. for R-4. Mr.Sanjai Kr.Pathak, Adv. for R-5. AND + W.P.(C) 1481/2011 JAYA SINHA AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Adv. v...
Ravi Nigam Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h January, 2013 + WRIT PET. (CRL.) 75/2013 RAVI NIGAM Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aman Vachher, Adv., Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Adv. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC with Ms. Charu Dalal, Adv. APP for the State. ASI Bhupender, PS Hauz Qazi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) CRL MA.458/2013 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The Application is allowed. WRIT PET. (CRL.) 75/2013 & CRL MA.457/2013 (stay) 1. By virtue of this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.), the Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.164/2012 dated 07.10.2012 under Section 506/34/380/448 IPC, registered in Police Station Hauz Qazi.2. The FIR was lodged on the complaint made by one Abhinav Krishan Aggarwal alleging that his father Shri...
Union of India Vs. Manjit Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA 42/2013 and CM Nos. 796/2013 (stay), 797/2013 (exemption), 798/2013 (filing additional documents) and 799/2013 (delay in filing 424 days) and Caveat No. 38/2013 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr Sachin Datta, CGSE versus MANJIT SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms Jyoti Singh, Sr Adv with Mr Sanjeev Kumar and Ms Tinu and Ms Sahila Lamba, Advs. AND + LPA 43/2013 and CM No. 800/2013 (stay), 801/2013 (exemption), 802/2013 (Placing on record additional documents) and 803/2013 (delay of 1 day) UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr Sachin Datta, CGSE versus MANJIT SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms Jyoti Singh, Sr Adv with Mr Sanjeev Kumar and Ms Tinu and Ms Sahila Lamba, Advs. LPA 4.& 43 of 2013 page 1 of 11 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER 15 01.2013 % WP(C) No. 2764/2001 was filed by Technical Assistants working in Indian ...