Delhi Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Cit Vs. Meera Goyal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on :17. 01.2013 ITA 1263/2011 CIT ..... Appellant versus MEERA GOYAL ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Karan Khanna, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms Asmita Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr Simran Mehta with Ms Inklee Roy and Ms Yogita Sunaria, Advocates. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This appeal by the revenue is directed against the order dated 05.04.2011 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in ITA No.604/Del/2011 in respect of the assessment year 2007-08.2. The respondent/ assessee has house property at 37, Friends Colony, New Delhi. On 28.01.2007 the respondent entered into an agreement to sell the said property to Shinestar Buildcon (P) Ltd. The sale consideration of the property was agreed upon at `150 crores. Earnest money under the agreement was determined to be `36 cro...
Subhash Nayyar Vs. Registrar, University of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:10. 01.2013 Judgment delivered on:17.01.2013 FAO(OS) 576/2009 & CM No.17199/2010 SUBHASH NAYYAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Chaudhary, Adv. Versus REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. A.P.S. Ahluwalia, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Ms. Manimala Roy & Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Manu Nayar, Adv. for R-2 to 5. Mr. M.A. Niyazi & Mr. Sanjay Sood, Advs. for R-6(a) to 6(c). + FAO(OS) 627/2009 VEENA NAYAR & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. M.A. Niyazi & Mr. Sanjay Sood, Advs. versus REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. A.P.S. Ahluwalia, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Ms. Manimala Roy & Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Manu Nayar, Adv. for R-2 to 5. Mr. S.K. Chaudhary, Adv. for R-6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 Both these appe...
Krishan Kumar Wadhwa Vs. Delhi Floorings Pvt. Ltd. and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h January, 2013 % + CS(OS) 97/2010 & IA Nos.17678/2010 & 6635/2011 (both u/S 15.CPC) KRISHAN KUMAR WADHWA ..... Plaintiff Through: Dr. Bhatia & Mr. Ankur Bansal, Advs. Versus DELHI FLOORINGS PVT. LTD. & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Adv. for D-1. Mr. R.S. Mathur, Adv. for D-2&3. Mr. U.K. Shandilya, Adv. for D-4.. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.The plaintiff has filed this suit for permanent and mandatory injunction pleading that he is a tenant in a portion ad-measuring 2858 sq. ft. along with open space in property No.71/5, Najafgarh Road, New Delhi as shown in Blue, Green and Orange colours in the site plan filed along with the plaint under the defendant No.1 and seeking to restrain the defendant No.1 from dispossessing the plaintiff from the said tenancy premises forcibly and without due process of law. Mandatory injunction is also claimed against the defendant No.2 ...
Veena Nayar and ors. Vs. Registrar, University of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:10. 01.2013 Judgment delivered on:17.01.2013 + FAO(OS) 627/2009 VEENA NAYAR & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. M.A. Niyazi & Mr. Sanjay Sood, Advs. versus REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. A.P.S. Ahluwalia, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Ms. Manimala Roy & Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Manu Nayar, Adv. for R-2 to 5. Mr. S.K. Chaudhary, Adv. for R-6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.For orders see in FAO(OS) 576/2009. INDERMEET KAUR, J.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.JANUARY 17 2013 A...
Satyendra Kumar Singh Vs. Delhi Jal Board
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
Mrs. Rajwant Sandhu, Member (A): 1. The applicant while working as Assistant Engineer (Civil) North-II in Delhi Jal Board (hereinafter referred to as DJB) was charge-sheeted vide Memo No.DJB/Vig./Disp/Major/2004/CS-995 dated 25.01.2005. The charge against the applicant was that as Assistant Engineer, Burari Area, he failed to take action against the owner of Hoover Apartments for illegal use of potable-water for construction purposes till he was directed to do so by Director (Revenue) and that he did not take prompt action for calculation of recovery of cost of water illegally used for construction purposes in spite of many references regarding unauthorized water connections in Burari area being made to him. The Inquiry Officer in his report dated 27.03.2006 concluded that the charges stood proved against the applicant. The Disciplinary Authority passed order dated 21.5.2007 imposing the penalty of reduction to three stages lower in the time scale of pay for a period of three years, wi...
Sandeep Kumar Sahu Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 25/2011 % Reserved on: Date of Decision:9. h October16. h January, 2013 SANDEEP KUMAR SAHU ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sunil K. Mittal, Ms. Deepti Gupta, Mr. Kshitij Mittal, Mr. Saurabh Balwani and Mr. Anshul Mittal, Advocate. Versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 243/2011 KAUSHAL @ BABLOO ..... Appellant Through Mr. Rajesh Tyagi, Advocate. Versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG SANJIV KHANNA, J: Sandeep Kumar Sahu and Kaushal @ Babloo impugn their conviction, under Section 302, 397 and 506-II of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and the sentences imposed upon them. They have been sentenced to life imprisonment and fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default of which they are to undergo simple imprisonment for one month, for the offence under Section 302 IPC, rigorous imp...
Union of India Represented by General Manager, Rai Vs. Smt. Raj Beti
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2013
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : January 16, 2013 + W.P.(C) 133/2013 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY GENERAL MANAGER, RAILWAYS & ORS. ...Petitioners Represented by: Mr.V.S.R.Krishna, Advocate with Mr.Abhishek Yadav, Advocate. versus SMT. RAJ BETI ...Respondent Represented by: Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Manjeet Singh Reen, Advocate and Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.CM No.269/2013 Allowed; subject to just exceptions. WP(C) No.133/2013 1. The undisputed facts are that late Shri Ram Singh, the husband of the respondent, after screening, was regularly appointed as a Gangman by the Indian Railways on May 02, 1981. While on duty, and probably checking the railway line, on December 24, 1987 he was hit by train No.4681, Ludhiana Express. In spite of prolonged medical treatment he could not recover and being declared medically unfit for further servic...
Air Force Bal Bharti School and anr. Vs. Delhi School Tribunal and ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2013
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:16. 01.2013 + LPA 48/2005 AIR FORCE BAL BHARTI SCHOOL & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Rekha Palli with Ms. Amrita Prakash and Ms. Poonam Singh, Advocates. versus DELHI SCHOOL TRIBUNAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Arjun Mitra, Advocate for Resp-2. Ms. Latika Choudhury, proxy for Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate for Resp-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. Heard counsel for the parties.2. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order of a learned Single Judge of this Court dated 15.10.2004 in WP (C) 4008/1993. The learned Single Judge had, even while upholding the findings of the Delhi School Education Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) impugned by the present appellant (hereinafter referred to as the School) in a writ petition, limited the arrears of salary and allowances payable to the LPA-...
M.P. Bansal Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: January 16, 2013 + W.P.(C) 5695/2011 M.P. BANSAL ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Shrigopal Aggarwal, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.R.V.Sinha, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Petitioner was holding substantive appointment as an Assistant Chemical Examiner. The next promotional post was that of Chemical Examiner Grade-II.2. Petitioner superannuated from service on December 31, 2006. Pertaining to the vacancy year 2004-05, DPC was held on May 22, 2008.3. As per rules in force, eligible officers notwithstanding they had superannuated as of the year 2004-05, were considered.4. The petitioner filed an O.A. before the Tribunal praying that since the DPC which met on May 22, 2008 made recommendations and drew up the panel for vacancy year 2004-05 in which year the petitioner was in service, he should...
Standing Conference of Public Enterprises Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Limi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:09. 01.2013 Judgment pronounced on:16. 01.2013. LPA 778/2012 STANDING CONFERENCE OF PUBLIC ENTERPRISES .... Appellant Through: Mr.Jayant Nath, Sr.Adv. Mr.B.C.Pandey, Advs. with versus BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.K.Datta, Adv. with Mr.Manish Srivastava, Adv. for BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. Mr.Sumeet Pushkarna, CGSC for R2/DPCL. Ms.Pratima Gupta, Adv. with Mr.Ankit Goel, Mr.Sandeep Gupta, Advs. for R-3. Mr.Nitin Saluja, Adv. for Mr.Najmi Waziri, Standing Counsel for R-4/GNCT of Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.The appellant obtained two electric power connections from erstwhile Delhi Vidyut Board (DVB) and had been making payment of the electricity bills, first to the erstwhile DVB and, thereafter to BSES Rajdhani Power Limited (BSES), which is respondent No. 1 in this appeal. The case of the appellant is that till July, 1999, the billing ...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »