Delhi Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Prasar Bharti Vs. Harikesh Bs Gautam and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: January 15, 2013 + W.P.(C) 6859/2010 PRASAR BHARTI ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Sachin Chopra, Mr.Anuj Tyagi, Mr.Sarvpreet S.Chawla, Advs. versus HARIKESH BS GAUTAM AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sanjai Kr.Pathak, Adv. for R-1. None for R-2. Mr.Harish Garg, Adv. for R-3. Mr.V.K.Tandon & Ms.Aakanksha Munjhal, Advs. for R-4 to R-25 & R-27 to R-29. Mr.Prem Kumar with Mr.Ashish Kumar Sharma & Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Advs. for R-26. AND + W.P.(C) 7813/2010 YASHVI TIRATH ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Prem Kumar with Mr.Ashish Kumar Sharma & Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Advs. versus UOI AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: R.V.Sinha with Mr.A.S.Singh & Ms.Sangita Rai, Advs. for R-1. Mr.Sachin Chopra, Mr.Anuj Tyagi, Mr.Sarvpreet S.Chawla, Advs. for R-2 & R-3. Mr.Harish Garg, Adv. for R-4. Mr.Sanjai Kr.Pathak, Adv. for R-5. AND + W.P.(C) 1481/2011 JAYA SINHA AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Adv. v...
P.K.Nayyar and ors. Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:07. 01.2013 Judgment pronounced on:15. 01.2013 W.P.(C)NO. 6976/2008 and W.P.(C) 5683/2010 P.K.NAYYAR & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. K.K.Rohatgi, Adv. Versus UOI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. B.V.Niren, CGSC with Mr. Prasouk Jain, Adv. for UOI. Mr. Nishakant Pandey, Adv. for DJB. Mr. Ajay Verma, Adv. for DDA. Mr. Madan Gera, Adv. for R-7. Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Natasha Saharawat and Ms. Ankita Mishra, Advs. AND SYNERGY WASTE MANAGEMENT PVT.LTD. Through: Mr. K.K.Rohatgi, Adv. ..... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through : LPA Nos.6976 /2008 & 5683/2010 ..... Respondents Mr. B.V.Niren, CGSC with Mr. Prasouk Jain, Adv. for UOI. Mr. Nishakant Pandey, Adv. for DJB. Mr. Ajay Verma, Adv. for DDA. Mr. Madan Gera, Adv. for R-7. Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Natasha Saharawat and Ms. Ankita Mishra, Advs. Page 1 of 14 HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. The...
Attar Singh Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2013
$~R-39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: January 15, 2013 + W.P.(C) 4512/2001 ATTAR SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Rakesh Dahiya, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The charge against the petitioner for which he faced a departmental inquiry was that on being transferred to the 10th Battalion DAP and relieved from the Central District on April 03, 1997, he did not report to the Commandant of the 10th Battalion DAP and was accordingly marked absent. In spite of notices issued requiring him to immediately report for duty on August 12, 1997 and September 23, 1997, the petitioner continued to be absent till he joined duty on November 10, 1997. He was absent for 7 months and 6 days. Having joined duty on November 10, 1997 ...
Ex-cpl Pritam Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2013
16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1664/2012 Date of decision:15th January, 2013 % EX-CPL PRITAM SINGH Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Gulab Chandra, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) CM No.6568/2012 This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the counter affidavit. However, the counter affidavit is already brought on record. The application is disposed of as being infructuous. WP(C) No.1664/2012 1. The instant petition assails an order dated 15 th December, 2011 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal in O.A. No.541/2011, Ex-CPL Pritam Singh v. Union of India & Ors.2. The petitioner was discharged from the Indian Air Force on the 16th May, 1974 as per the discharge book extract placed before the court. The Armed Forces Tribunal was of the view that he had filed the petition for grant of pension after 37 years and...
Rishi Pal Singh Vs. Commissioner of Police and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2013
$~R-34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: January 15, 2013 + W.P.(C) 4098/2001 RISHI PAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by: Ms.Archana Gaur, Advocate versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.V.C.Jha for Ms.Sonia Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The relevant facts are that on December 4, 1979 the petitioner was appointed as a Constable (Driver), and as per Rules was on probation for a period of 2 years.3. Due to pendency of a criminal case, the probation was extended i.e. petitioner was not confirmed as a Constable (Driver). As time passed by, persons junior to the petitioner were confirmed and even promoted to the post of Head Constable (Driver). The year 1991 was reached.4. This compelled the petitioner to file O.A.No.1106/1991 which was allowed by the Tribunal with a direction issued that petit...
Chander Dev Vs. Delhi Transco Ltd. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.5807 /2011 % January 15, 2013 CHANDER DEV Through: ...... Petitioner Mr. Apurb Lal, Advocate. versus DELHI TRANSCO LTD. & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Biji Rajesh, Advocate with Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate with Ms. Latika Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition the petitioner seeks the relief of direction to the respondents to condone the delay of the petitioner in submitting the certificate of experience for the post of Sub Station Attendant (Grade-II) and with respect to which post petitioner had applied through the regular recruitment process, but was denied employment on the ground of failure to submit the requisite experience certificate within the twice extended cut off date.2. At the outset, I was inclined to condone the delay of 22 days in...
Ravi Singhal and ors. Vs. Manali Singhal and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2013
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : January 15, 2013 + FAO(OS) 04/2013 RAVI SINGHAL & ORS. ...Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Y.P.Narula, Sr.Advocate and Shri Kirti Uppal, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Aniruddha Choudhury, and Mr.Abhay Narula, Advocate. versus MANALI SINGHAL & ANR. ...Respondents Represented by: Ms.Pinky Anand, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Manali Singhal, Ms.Ankita Mishra, and Ms.Natasha Sahrawat, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.CM No.65/2013 and 66/2013 Allowed; subject to just exceptions. FAO(OS) No.4/2013 1. Vide impugned order dated September 27, 2012 the learned Single Judge has dismissed IA No.10697/2001 filed by the appellants under Order VI Rule 17 CPC praying for leave to be granted to amend the written statement filed by the appellants who were defendants No.1 to 3 in the suit filed by the respondents.2. Mother and daughter i.e. the respondents, had fil...
Yashvi Tirath Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: January 15, 2013 + W.P.(C) 6859/2010 PRASAR BHARTI ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Sachin Chopra, Mr.Anuj Tyagi, Mr.Sarvpreet S.Chawla, Advs. versus HARIKESH BS GAUTAM AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sanjai Kr.Pathak, Adv. for R-1. None for R-2. Mr.Harish Garg, Adv. for R-3. Mr.V.K.Tandon & Ms.Aakanksha Munjhal, Advs. for R-4 to R-25 & R-27 to R-29. Mr.Prem Kumar with Mr.Ashish Kumar Sharma & Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Advs. for R-26. AND + W.P.(C) 7813/2010 YASHVI TIRATH ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Prem Kumar with Mr.Ashish Kumar Sharma & Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Advs. versus UOI AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: R.V.Sinha with Mr.A.S.Singh & Ms.Sangita Rai, Advs. for R-1. Mr.Sachin Chopra, Mr.Anuj Tyagi, Mr.Sarvpreet S.Chawla, Advs. for R-2 & R-3. Mr.Harish Garg, Adv. for R-4. Mr.Sanjai Kr.Pathak, Adv. for R-5. AND + W.P.(C) 1481/2011 JAYA SINHA AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Adv. v...
M/S. Gee Pee Foods Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Sh. Digvijay Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h January, 2013 + CRL. REV. P. 65/2012 M/S. GEE PEE FOODS PVT. LTD. & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Jaiswal, Adv. with Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Adv. versus SH. DIGVIJAY SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The question that falls for determination in this Revision Petition is, whether a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the Act) can be presented at a place where the Complainant deposited the cheque in his Bank (i.e. at the place where the collecting Bank is situated).2. A complaint under Section 138 read with Section 142 of the Act was presented against the Petitioners on the averments that on 01.03.2009, the Respondent was appointed as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) with the First Petitioner on a monthly salary of `75,000/- to establish its operations in Northern India. In discharge o...
Munna Khan Vs. State (Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :10. H JANUARY, 2013 DECIDED ON :15. H JANUARY, 2013 + CRL.A.669/2010 & CRL.M.B.Nos.484/2011 & 1697/2011 MUNNA KHAN Through : ....Appellant Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate. VERSUS STATE (NCT) OF DELHI .Respondent Through : Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant-Munna Khan impugns the judgment dated 26.10.2009 in S.C. No.76/2008 by which he was convicted under Section 393/398 IPC and by an order on sentence dated 28.10.2009 sentenced to undergo RI for three years with fine of `1,000/- and in default SI for fifteen days under Section 393 IPC and RI for seven years under Section 398 IPC. Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently.2. The prosecution examined PW-1 Ranjit (the complainant) and PW-2 Kamal Raj (his neighbour). Other witnesses examined by the prosecution are police witnesses. Statement of the accused was recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C. He pleaded false implication and ...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »