Delhi Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Alka Roy vs Seema Sharma & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 83/2026 & I.A. 2403/2026, I.A. 2404/2026, I.A. 2405/2026, I.A. 2406/2026ALKA ROY .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ankit Kishore, Advocate Mob: 9931844050 Email: [email protected] versusSEEMA SHARMA & ANR. .....Defendants Through: None.CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. After some arguments, learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff submits that liberty may be granted to him to withdraw the present suit and file a fresh suit, so that the Sale Deed in favour of defendant no. 2 can also be challenged in the suit for partition. 2. Accordingly, the present suit, along with the pending applications is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty.MINI PUSHKARNA, J JANUARY 29, 2026 akThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the D...
Amiruddin @Amir vs State of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~112 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 380/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2929/2026 AMIRUDDIN @AMIR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Parul Rohatgi, Advocate.versusSTATE OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for State. Mr. Ajay Bharti, Advocate for complainant. Insp. Mintu Singh, PS-SP Badli.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. An adjournment was sought in this petition at first call. The adjournment was refused, but the matter was passed over to enable learned counsel for the petitioner to appear. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing on second call, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 3. As the petitioner is not represented, the bail application, alongwith pending application, is dismissed for non-prosecution. 4. It may be noted that the petitioner had, very recently, filed a bail application [BAIL APPLN. 43/2025] in which the following order was passed on 07.01.2026: After some arguments, ...
Shri Purshotam Behl vs National Highways Authority of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 113/2026 & I.A. 2384/2026 SHRI PURSHOTAM BEHL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dhananjay Mehlawat, Adv. (through VC)versusNATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shivam Goel, Mr. Anil Kumar Goyal, Ms. Ramya S. Goel & Ms. Sanya Sharma, Advs.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN ORDER % 29.01.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to the prayer made. 3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the proceedings is extended by six months. 4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, J JANUARY 29, 2026 haThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning t...
Nitish Kumar and Ors vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~81 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 742/2026 NITISH KUMAR AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vikas Kumar Gautam, Advocate alongwith petitioners in person versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State with Inspector Satbir Singh Respondent no. 2 in personCORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR bearing no. 231/2024, registered at Police Station Jaitpur, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC) and all other proceedings arising therefrom. 2. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer (IO) from Police Station Jaitpur, Delhi. 3. Brief facts of the present case are that the marriage between the petitioner no...
R.S.C. College vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~101 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1207/2026 R.S.C. COLLEGE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhilesh K Srivastava with Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, Advs. versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Malhotra, Adv. (Appearance not given) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH ORDER % 29.01.2026CM APPL. 5919/2026 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 1207/2026 1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to the respondent No.2 to consider and decide the pending application of the petitioner institution regarding shifting of its premises. 2. Mr. Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the case the address of the petitioner college is Basant Parisar, Mayur Market, Gandhi Road, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh- 474011 and the petitioner wishes to change the address to Village Sirkoda (Badori), Jh...
XX vs State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~127 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 750/2026 & CRL.M.As. 2982-83/2026 XX .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoranjan Kumar, AdvocateversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for the State alongwith SI Neetu Shekhawat, P.S.-C.R.Park Mr. Rahul Yadav and Ms. Khushi Gola, Advocates for R-3 to 5CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. The present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioner/complainant against the orders dated 15.12.2025 and 20.12.2025 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, South East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi, [Sessions Court], by which interim protection has been granted to the accused respondents No. 3 to 5 herein in their application for anticipatory bail. 2. As the application for anticipatory bail remains pending before the Sessions Court, Mr. Manoranjan Kumar, learned counsel for the peti...
Sita Ram Gupta vs Krishna Chaurasiya
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~85 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 97/2026, CM APPL. 6044/2026 and CM APPL. 6046/2026 SITA RAM GUPTA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Naveen Jha, Adv. versus KRISHNA CHAURASIYA .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA ORDER % 29.01.2026 CM APPL. 6045/2026 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application is disposed of. RFA 97/2026, CM APPL. 6044/2026 and CM APPL. 6046/2026 3. CM APPL.6044/2026 has been filed on behalf of the Appellant under Section 5 of Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay of 1168 days in filing of present Regular First Appeal. 4. It is submitted that the Applicant is suffering from severe diabetes and also does not have mental condition to pursue his case further. His wife is also very ill and was admitted in the Hospital many times. Some medical documents have been annexed with this Application. 5. It is further submitted that the Appellant was unable to arrange ...
Shuaib @ Shoaib Ahmad vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~80 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 389/2026 SHUAIB @ SHOAIB AHMAD .....Petitioner Through: Counsel (appearance not given).versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with Mr. Chetan Dahiya, Adv.CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA ORDER % 29.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 2967/2026 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 389/2026 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant bail application. 4. Application is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J JANUARY 29, 2026/A/GJThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/02/2026 at 11:33:39...
Laxmi Devi vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~128 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1198/2026 & CM APPL. 5869/2026 LAXMI DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms Prabhsahay Kaur SC with Adv Mr. Aditya Verma, Adv. Ms. Anmol M Kaur, Mr. Shubham Srivastava AE for DDA Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak, SC with Mrs K. K. Kiran Pathak Mr Sunil Kumar Jha Mr Mohd Sueb Akhtar, Advocates for R3 Ms Vaishali Gupta PC and Ms Ishita Gupta, Adv for R4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH ORDER % 29.01.2026 CM APPL. 5870/2026 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 1198/2026 1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers:- (a) a Writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus or Prohibition or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction may please be passed in favour of the Petitioner thereby restraini...
Divakar Chauhan @ Majju vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 210/2026&CRL.M.A. 1696/2026 DIVAKAR CHAUHAN @ MAJJU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Meena, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr.Ajay Vikram Singh, APP with PSI Megha. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for petitioner does not press the present bail application. He further submits that since the case is already at the stage of recording of statement of accused, and the testimony of the prosecutrix is somewhat wavering, learned Trial Court may be requested to expedite the disposal. 2. Learned APP for the State also assures that there would not be any delay from their side. 3. In view of the above, the present application is disposed of as not pressed. 4. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. 5. Learned Trial Court is also requested to dispose of th...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »