Chennai Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.T.J.Prakash, Vs S.T.Rajan,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASJudgment reserved on : 19.02.2026 Judgment pronounced on : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI CRP.Nos.5757 & 5758 of 2025 & CMP.Nos.28626 & 28627 of 2025 1.K.T.J.Prakash .. Petitioner in both CRPs Vs. 1.S.T.Rajan 2.S.T.Balachander 3.Vijayakumar .. Respondents in CRP.No.5757 of 2025 1.S.T.Rajan 2.S.T.Balachander 3.Murugan .. Respondents in CRP.No.5758 of 2025 Common prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the order in E.A.Nos.4 & 5 of 2024 in E.P.Nos.32 & 31 of 2024 on the file of the XVI Small Causes Court, dated 06.11.2025 and direct the respondents re- delivery of possession. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Nedunchelian in both CRPs For Respondents : Mr.A.Amalraj for RR1 and 2 in both CRPsCOMMON ORDERThe revision petitioner is an obstructor, whose applications for noting his obstruction have been dismissed by the XVI Small Causes Court, Chennai. 2.I ...
Moisanraj vs Padmanaban (Died),1.Jammam Mary
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 27.02.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHARMoisanraj . Petitioner Vs Padmanaban (died) 1.Jammam mary 2.Gowri 3.Pratheesh 4.Geetha 5.Praveen . Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the impugned fair and decretal order dated 21.08.2025 passed in I.A.No.4 of 2024 in O.S.No.159 of 2019 on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Chengalpattu. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Narayanan For R1, R4 & R5 : No appearance For R2 & R3 : M/s.G.Magesh KumarORDERThis Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Trial Court dismissing the application filed by the petitioner seeking amendment of the plaint.2. The petitioner herein filed a suit seeking permanent injunctionrestraining the defendants from interfering with his possession and enjoyment of the B Schedule property. Pending suit, the petitioner filed an amendment application seeking amen...
P.J.Prabaharan vs M/S.Margadarsi Chits Private Ltd
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
2026:MHC:891 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASJudgment reserved on : 24.02.2026 Judgment pronounced on : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI CRP.No.5960 of 2025 & CMP.No.29461 of 2025 P.J.Prabaharan .. Petitioner Vs. 1.M/s.Margadarsi Chits Private Limited, Kumaran Building, No.AA-152, 3rd Avenue, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040. 2.V.Raja Singh 3.K.Sethupandian 4.R.Gnanapooranam 5.S.Meerabai 6.S.Durai Babu .. RespondentsPrayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of CPC, to set aside the orderand decree dated 24.09.2025 made in E.P.No.46 of 2025 in ARC.No.252 of 2016 on the file of the XXVII Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vijayakumar For Respondents : Mr.D.Shivakumaran for R1 No appearance for RR2 to 6ORDERThe chit subscriber/ first judgment debtor is the revision petitioner, challenging the order in EP.No.46 of 2025 on the file of the XXVII Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai. 2.I have heard Mr.S.Vijayakumar,...
K.Gowri, Vs The Managing Director,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI1.Mrs.K.Gowri 2.Mr.K.Vijayakumar 3.Mrs.K.Priyadarshini 4.Mrs.A.Mahalakshmi ...Appellants Vs. The Managing Director, Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. Branch Office at Poonamallee Bus Depot. Chennai 600 056. ...Respondent Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 praying to enhance the amount awarded in M.C.O.P.No.17 of 2023 dated 29.08.2025 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (2 nd Additional District and Sessions Judge), Tiruvallur at Poonamallee as prayed for with interest and cost. For Appellants : Mr.K.Varadhakamaraj For Respondent : Mr.M.Murali VinodhPage1 of 9JUDGMENTThis Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been preferred by the appellants/claimants seeking to enhance the quantum of compensation awarded by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Motor Acciden...
Angel Impex vs the Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA and WMP.No.51111 of 2025 Angel Impex Represented By Is Proprietor, Mr Mahesh Dialdas Kirpalani S/o Dialdas No 1/1 Kanni Amman Kovil Street, Vanagaram, Chennai 600 095 ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s)Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorari Mandamus, Call for the records in proceedings Lr. R. No 19 / A1 / 2025 dated 19.08.2025 on the file of the 2nd Respondent, refusing to deseal the premises of the petitioner situated at No. 1/1, Kanni Amman Koil Street, Vanagaram, Chennai 600 095 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction, and consequently, to direct the Respondents to forthwith deseal the premises and pass AMENDED AS To call for the records in proceedings in R.No. 6015/S9/FSD dated 25.11.2025 on the Page1 of 4file of the 1st Respondent, refusing to deseal the premises of the petit...
V Karthik Vs S. Kishore
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESHV.Karthik .... Applicant Vs. S.Kishore .... Respondent Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S.Rules read with Section 29 A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to extend the time limit for completing the arbitration proceedings pending before the Sole Arbitrator for a further period of six months or for the time frame as fixed by this Court as per Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. For Applicant : Mr.N.Damodaran For Respondent : Mr.Velmurugan *****ORDERThis application has been filed under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking extension of mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal to proceed further and pass final award.N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.gm2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondent.3. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the case is now at the stage of c...
C.Karthika Jothi, Vs K.N.Om Prakash
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE AND C.Karthika Jothi, W/o K.N Om Prakash and D/o N.Chezhlian, P.N Pudur, Coimbatore 641 041. ..Petitioner(s) Vs K.N.Om Prakash S/o Late R.Natarajan, D.No 1C/60, Ayyappa Nagar, Gobichettipalayam Tk, Erode Dist. ..Respondent(s) C.Karthika Jothi W/o K.N Om Prakash and D/o N.Chezhlian, P.N Pudur, Coimbatore 641 041. ..Appellant(s) Vs K.N.Om Prakash S/o Late R.Natarajan, D.No 1C/60, Ayyappa Nagar, Gobichettipalayam Tk, Erode Dist. ..Respondent(s)Page1 of 6To withdraw and transfer of HMOP No. 124 of 2020 Which is pending on the file of the Honble Sub Ordinate Court at Gopichetipalayam, Erode District to be tried before the Honble Family Court, Coimbatore District. To Stay of all the proceedings in HMOP No. 124 of 2020 Which is pending on the file of the Honble Sub Ordinate Court at Gopichetipalayam, Erode District pending disposal of the above Tr. CMP For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Saravanan F...
K.Deivasigamani Vs The Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN K.Deivasigamani S/o.A.Kannappan, Residing at Ayyanar Kovil Street, Vettukkadu Village, Vikkiravandi Taluk, Villupuram District-605 501Petitioner-in-person Vs 1.The Secretary to Government Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009 2.The District Collector Collector Office, 3.The District Revenue Officer (DRO) District Revenue Office, 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO) Revenue Divisional Office, 5.The Tashildar Taluk Office, Vikravandi Taluk, Villupuram District-605 652 RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioners representations (Annexure F1 to Annexure 11) dated 27.01.2023, 30.09.2025 etc. and to take appropriate action in accordance with law for formation, restoration and protect...
Olitec Solar Private Limited Vs Babu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 27.02.2026Coram:The Honourable Mrs.Justice K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI M/s.Olitec Solar Private Limited, Rep. by its Authorised Signatory, Mr.Muralidoss, Having a registered office at: No.5/63, Door No.103, 1st floor, Gateway House, House of Hiranandhani, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Egattur Village, Navalur, Thiruporur, Chennai 600 130. ...PetitionerVersus1.Babu 2.Malliga 3.Devi 4.K.Dinakaran 5.K.Saravanan 6.Subbulakshmi 7.Minor Nethrasree 8.Minor Darshan Minors are represented by their next friend/natural guardian Mother Mrs.Subbulakshmi 9.B.Ganesh ...Respondents Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 151 of C.P.C praying to dispense with the production of the certified copy of the impugned common order dated 10.11.2025 passed in I.A.No.4 of 2025 in O.S.No.307 of 2024 on the file of 1st Additional District and Sessions Court, Thiruvallur for the present. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Harsha Vardhini For Respondents 1 to 8 : Mr...
J.Usha Vs Thiru. Kannappan and 2 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN J.Usha D/o. Jayaraman B.T.Assistant (Tamil) Auxilium Girls Higher Secondary School, 74, 75, McNichols Road, Chetpet, Chennai 600 031. ... Petitioner Vs Egmore, Chennai 600 008. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act, to punish the respondents for wilfully disobeying the orders passed in W.P.No.23217 of 2021 dated 29.10.2021 . For Petitioner : Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan For Respondents : Mrs.Rajarajeswari Government AdvocateORDERThe petitioner has filed this contempt petition to punish the respondents for disobeying the order of this Court in W.P.No.23217 of 2021 dated 29.10.2021.2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner confirms that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.23217 of 2021, has been complied with.3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Contempt Petition ...
- ‹ Prev
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- Next ›
- Last »