V Karthik Vs S. Kishore

V Karthik vs S. Kishore

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 27, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1497241

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1497241
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh
Decided On: Feb 27, 2026
Case Number: A/797/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

V Karthik

Respondent

S. Kishore

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 27.02.2026coramthe honourable mr.justice n.anand venkateshv.karthik .... applicant vs. s.kishore .... respondent application filed under order xiv rule 8 of o.s.rules read with section 29 a(4) of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, praying to extend the time limit for completing the arbitration proceedings pending before the sole arbitrator for a further period of six months or for the time frame as fixed by this court as per section 29a(4) of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996. for applicant : mr.n.damodaran for respondent : mr.velmurugan *****orderthis application has been filed under section 29-a of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, seeking extension of mandate of the arbitral tribunal to proceed further and pass final award.n.anand venkatesh, j.gm2. heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondent.3. it is brought to the notice of this court that the case is now at the stage of cross-examination of cw-1. hence, this court extends the mandate for a period of six (6) months from today. this application is disposed of in the above terms. 27.02.2026 index:yes/nospeaking order/non-speaking orderncc:yes/no gm

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.02.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
V.Karthik .... Applicant Vs. S.Kishore .... Respondent Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S.Rules read with Section 29 A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to extend the time limit for completing the arbitration proceedings pending before the Sole Arbitrator for a further period of six months or for the time frame as fixed by this Court as per Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. For Applicant : Mr.N.Damodaran For Respondent : Mr.Velmurugan *****

ORDER

This application has been filed under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking extension of mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal to proceed further and pass final award.

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondent.

3. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the case is now at the stage of cross-examination of CW-1. Hence, this Court extends the mandate for a period of six (6) months from today. This application is disposed of in the above terms. 27.02.2026 Index:yes/no

Speaking Order/Non-speaking order

NCC:yes/no gm

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties V Karthik vs S. Kishore Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh