Chennai Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.CHANDRASEKAR Vs State rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
Crl.M.P.No.1431 of 2026 in Crl.RC.SR.No.102837 of 2025SUNDER MOHAN, J.This petition is filed to condone the delay of 14 days in filing the above Criminal Revision.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Vinothraja, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered. 30.01.2026 Tsg Note: Registry is directed to number this Criminal Revision, if it is otherwise in order. 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Mujeeburahman Vs The State Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR in Mujeeburahman ... Petitioner Vs. State Rep.by Inspector of Police, Pollachi. ... Respondent PRAYER : To relax the condition imposed in Paragraph No.7b in Crl.OP.No.899 of 2025 by order dated 12.01.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.Sheela Raju For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.899 of 2025 dated 12.01.2026, passed by this Court to report before the respondent police daily at 10.30a.m, for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.2. Being not satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, I am not inclined to allow this petition.4. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed. Vv To1. The Inspector of Police, Pollachi.2. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104.K.RAJASEKAR, ...
Govardhun Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR 1.K.Govardhun2. G.Santhi ... Petitioners Vs. The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District. Crime No.20 of 2025 ... RespondentPRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.20 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.Ramalingam Nandakumar For Respondent : M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Criminal Side)ORDERThe petitioners herein apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 420 read with Section 34 of IPC in Crime No.20 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is thebrother and sister-in-law of the defacto complai...
N.SIVAKUMAR Vs The Commissioner of prohibition and Excise,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.01.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN & W.M.P.No.2652 of 2026 N.Sivakumar S./o Natrajan Chengapalli Post Tiruppur District 638 812 Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise Ezhilagam Chennai 600 005.2. The District Collector Tiruppur.3. The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd (TASMAC) 4th Floor, CMDA Tower, Egmore Chennai.4. The Superintendent of Police Tiruppur.5. The Senior Regional Manager 305A, Vilankurichi Road Peelammedu Coimbatore.6. The District Manager Angeripalayam Road Tirupur 641 602.7. The Assistant Commissioner of Excise District Collectorate Tiruppur8. The Tahsildar Uthukuli Taluk Uthukuli.9. The Deputy superintendent of police Avinashi Tiruppur District. 10.The Inspector of Police Kunnathur Police Station Kunnathur Tiruppur District. Respondent(s)Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of ...
K.Panchatcharam vs the Managing Director
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI K.Panchatcharam ..Petitioner(s) Vs Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (VPM) Ltd.,Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay the interest to the petitioner at the rate of 8% per annum for the belated payment of retirement benefits for the period of 30.06.2024 to 02.12.2025 i.e., 521 days on Provident Fund, Gratuity, Leave Amount, Commuted Pension and other retirement benefits. Page1 of 4For Petitioner(s) : Ms.D.Nirmala For Respondent(s) : Ms.S.Pavithra for R1 Mr.C.S.K.Sathish for R2ORDERAggrieved by the belated payment of terminal benefits such as Provident Fund, Gratuity, Leave Amount, Commuted Pension and other retirement benefits, the petitioner has come up with this Writ petition seeking interest at the rate of 8% ...
RAHMAN Vs State Rep by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.1604 of 2026 Rahman ... Petitioner Vs The State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Ennore All Women Police Station, Chennai. (Crime No.343of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No. 343 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police For Petitioner(s) : Mr.S. Karthick For Respondent(s) : Mr. A. Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 30.10.2025 for the offence under Section Girl missing altered to Section 9 of Child Marriage Act r/w Section 6 of POCSO Act, 2006 in Crime No.343 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner stalked with thevictim her aged about 17 years and kidnapped her to Peripalayam und...
Devandiran Vs Rukmani
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR Devandiran S/o.Thimmathasiri, Gundukolai, Kondakinthana Palli, Natrampalli Taluk, Tirupattur District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Rukmani2. Radha3. Saraswathi4. Sangaswaran5. Ashok Kumar6. Mozhiselvan Now at Major7. Kokilavani (Now at Major) 4th and 5th defendants are Minor at the time of filing the Original Suit.8. Jayabarathi9. Sasikala 10.Sathish Babu 11.Geethanjali Page1 of 4 12.Sridhar 13.Diviya ..Respondent(s)Prayer: The civil revision petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to direct the Subordinate Judge, Tirupattur, Tirupattur District to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.79 of 2020 within stipulated period. For Petitioner(s): M/s.M.Sathish KumarORDERThe civil revision petition is filed seeking direction to Subordinate Judge, Tirupattur, Tirupattur District to dispose of the suit filed by the respondents 1 and 2 in OS.No. 79 of 2020 within a time stipulated b...
Elumalai vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSEElumalai ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Kallakurichi & District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kallakurichi Taluk & District. 3.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Vanapuram Taluk, Kallakurichi District. 4.Narayanasamy Naidu ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 3rd respondent to remove the 4th respondents name from the Patta No.3088 in respect of the property in Survey No.82/2A3A at Pudhupattu Village, Vanapuram Taluk, Kallakurichi District based on petitioners representation dated 25.08.2025.Page No.1 of 6 For Petitioner : Mr.G.Balamanikandan For Respondents : Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate [R1 to R3] Notice dispensed with [R4] *****ORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to remove the name of the 4th resp...
G.VENKATESAPERUMAL Vs The Managing Director
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANIG.Venkatesaperumal ..Petitioner(s) Vs (Villupuram)Ltd, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Villupuram )Ltd, Employees Pension Fund Trust, ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay interest to the petitioner at the rate of 9% per annum for the belated payment of his Provident Fund, Leave Liability, Gratuity and pension Commutation Amount. Page1 of 4For Petitioner(s) : Mr.P.Manojkumar For Respondent(s) : Mrs.S.PavithraORDERAggrieved by the belated payment of terminal benefits such as Provident Fund, Leave Liability, Gratuity and Pension Commutation Amount, the petitioner has come up with this Writ petition seeking interest at the rate of 9% per annum, for the said delay caused on the part of the respondents.2. In view of the consent expressed by the learned ...
V.RADHAKRISHNAN Vs The Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA V.Radhakrishnan ..Petitioner Vs3. Vijayakumar..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita to direct the 1st respondent police not to harass the Petitioner in any manner whatsoever except by following due process of law, in connection with the complaint of the 2nd respondent in C.No.252/SP(G) DCB/PLR/2024 dated 26.09.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Jawahar For Respondent : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Criminal Side) For R1 and R2 Page1 of 4ORDERThe present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the second respondent police not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.2. The case of the petitioner is that under the pretext of conducting an enquiry in connection with the existing civil dispute with the third respondent, the second respondent Police are unnecessarily h...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »