Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Mujeeburahman Vs The State Rep. by

Mujeeburahman vs The State Rep. by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 30, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1417081

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL MP/1293/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mujeeburahman

Respondent

The State Rep. by

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 30.01.2026coramthe honourable mr justice k.rajasekar in mujeeburahman ... petitioner vs. state rep.by inspector of police, pollachi. ... respondent prayer : to relax the condition imposed in paragraph no.7b in crl.op.no.899 of 2025 by order dated 12.01.2026. for petitioner : mr.sheela raju for respondent : ms.j.r.archana government advocate (crl.side)orderthis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner in crl.o.p.no.899 of 2025 dated 12.01.2026, passed by this court to report before the respondent police daily at 10.30a.m, for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.2. being not satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, i am not inclined to allow this petition.4. accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition stands dismissed. vv to1. the inspector of police, pollachi.2. the public prosecutor high court of madras, chennai 600 104.k.rajasekar, j.vv in

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 30.01.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR in Mujeeburahman ... Petitioner Vs. State Rep.by Inspector of Police, Pollachi. ... Respondent PRAYER : To relax the condition imposed in Paragraph No.7b in Crl.OP.No.899 of 2025 by order dated 12.01.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.Sheela Raju For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.899 of 2025 dated 12.01.2026, passed by this Court to report before the respondent police daily at 10.30a.m, for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

2. Being not satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, I am not inclined to allow this petition.

4. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed. Vv To

1. The Inspector of Police, Pollachi.

2. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104.

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

Vv in

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Mujeeburahman vs The State Rep. by Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales