Chennai Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
N. Mohammed Sufyan vs the State Rep by Its,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.M.P.No.1383 of 2026 in Crl.OP.No.35368 of 2025 N.Mohammed Sufyan ... Petitioner Vs. State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Kilambakkam Police Station, Chengalpattur District. ... Respondent PRAYER : To relax the condition imposed to the petitioner that to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30a.m., until further orders passed in Crl.OP.No.35368 of 2025 dated 26.12.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Kumarasamy For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.35368 of 2025 dated 26.12.2025, passed by this Court to report before the respondent police daily at 10.30a.m, until further orders.2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that thepetitioner has been regularly complying with the...
Thamilvanan Vs The State Rep.by, The Sub Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.01.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Thamilvanan ... Petitioner -vs- State Rep by, The Sub-Inspector of Police, (Crime No.539 of 2025) ... Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.539 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Parthiban For Respondent : M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side) *********ORDERToday, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Criminal Original Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learnedcounsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. drl To 1.The Sub-Inspector of Police, 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.K. RAJASEKAR, J.drl...
R.Ravikumar Vs H.Parimala and 2 others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL1. R.Ravikumar S/o. Late.I.Renugopal, Old No.51, New No.48, Mookathal Street, Purasawalkkam, Chennai-600 007 Applicant(s) Vs1. H.Parimala and 2 othersW/o Harikumar, D/o.I.Renugopal,No.72,Venkatesa Naicken Street, Kasapet, Chennai-12. 2.R.Kalpana W/o Lalbahadur, D/o.I.Renugopal,No.14/84, Chinnathambi Street, Kasapet, Chennai-12. 3.R.Sumathi W/o. Elangovan, D/o.I.Renugopal,No.B-12, 2nd Floor, Vidyodhaya Apartments, T.Nagar, Chennai-17. Respondent(s) PRAYER :The application is treated as urgent. To receive the additional written statement for the amended plaint filed on 12.11.2025 by the petitioner. To pass such further or other orders as may deem fit and proper. For Applicant : Mr.M.Devaraj For Respondents : Mr.R.ChellamuthuORDERThis application has been filed by the applicant to receive the additional written statement for the amended plaint filed on 12.11.2025.2. According to the applica...
A.Ponraj Vs The Teachers Recruitment Board
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI A.Ponraj ... Petitioner Vs. Chennai 600 006. ... RespondentPrayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent Teachers Recruitment Board to select and appoint the petitioner as Special Teacher in Physical Education pursuant to Notification No.05/2017, dated 26.07.2017 under the MBC/DNC T category against the 20% of the posts reserved for Persons Studied in Tamil Medium (PSTM) candidates under Act 40 of 2010 taking note of the fact that the petitioner has secured 60 marks in the written examination held on 23.09.2017.For Petitioner : Ms.C.Uma For Respondent : Mr.C.KathiravanORDERBy consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.2.The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent Teachers Recruitment Board to select and...
K.Saravanan vs the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI IN WP NO. 2767 OF 2026 K.Saravanan Assistant and Assistant Canteen officer, Petitioner(s) Vs Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): D.Lakshmipathy For Respondent: Mr.S.Balamurugan, GAORDERThis petition has been filed seeking to stay the order dated 04.08.2025 passed by the second respondent in O.Mu.No.051/Management/AIIRLIVAS/ 2025 till the disposalof the writ petition. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr.S.Balamurugan, learned Government Advocate, who takes notice for the respondents. 3.Granting the relief sought for in this petition would amount to granting the relief sought for in the writ petition. Hence, this miscellaneous petition is dismissed. Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To M.DHANDAPANI J. pri IN WP NO. 2767 OF...
S.Packiam vs Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
2026:MHC:371IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON: 09-01-2026PRONOUNCED ON: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN1. S.Packiam S/o. S.M.K. Sikkandar, Sub Registrar (Guidelines) Office Of The District Registrar, North Chennai 600 001 Appellant(s) Vs1. Government Of Tamil NaduRep.By Principal Secretary To Government, Commercial Taxes And Registration Department, Secretariat, Chennai 9. 2.The Inspector General Of Registration, Chennai 28. Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of The Letters Patent, praying to allow the Writ Appeal set aside the order dated 22.10.2019 in WP No.10053 of 2013. For Appellant(s): Mr.M. Ravi For Respondent(s): Mr.Haja Nazirudeen, Additional Advocate General assisted By Mr.U.Baranidharan, Special Government Pleader *********JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was made by C.KUMARAPPAN, J.) The appellant herein is the petitioner before the Writ Court. He challenged the punish...
B.Sivakumar vs State Rep by, Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.M.P.No.918 of 2026 in Crl.OP.No.27418 of 2025 B.Sivakumar ... Petitioner Vs. State Rep.by Inspector of Police, T-1, Ambattur Police Station, Chennai-600 053 ... Respondent PRAYER : To relax the condition imposed to the petitioner that he shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders in Crl.OP.No.27418 of 2025 on 03.10.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Mohanraj For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.27418 of 2025 dated 03.10.2025, passed by this Court to report before the respondent police daily at 10.30a.m, until further orders.2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court.3. Considering the said submission, the condition imposed by th...
Tabraze Ahmed @ Tabaraze Alam Vs State by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1. Tabraze Ahmed @ Tabaraze Alam2. Khalid Ahmed @ Khalith ..Petitioner(s) Vs State by, The Inspector of Police, Chennai. TamilNadu - 600 118, (Crime No. 339 of 2025) ..Respondent(s)Prayer: To extend the time by two weeks to surrender before the court in pursuance of the order dated 25.09.2025 made in crl op no.19741 of 2025. For Petitioner(s): M/s.M.Baskar For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to extend the time for complying the conditions as per the order of this Court in Crl.O.P.No.19741 of 2025 dated 25.09.2025. Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI2. Heard both sides.3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition isordered and time is extended by one week to the petitioners to comply the conditions as ordered by this Court, from the date on which, the order copy made ready. 30-01-2026 GBI To 1.The Inspector ...
Muthukumar Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.1113 of 2026 Muthukumar S/o.Venakatachalam ... Petitioner Vs The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, AWPS Mannargudi Police Station, Tiruvarur District. (Crime No.01 of 2026) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest by the respondent in Crime No.01 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr. Deenadayalan Selvam For Respondent : M/s. J.R. Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ******ORDERThe petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 7 and 8 of POCSO Act, in Crime No.01 of 2026 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was workingas temporary part time P...
Jaisankar Vs The Deputy Collector / District Manager,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Jaishankar ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Selvaraj For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Sekar Standing CounselORDERThis miscellaneous petition is filed to fix an early date to hear W.P.No.28605 of 2022 and pass orders. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the affidavit filed in support of the petition. Page1 of 2T.VINOD KUMAR, J.3. It is to be noted that the writ petition in W.P.No.28605 of 2022 is filed challenging the proceedings dated 18.09.2017.4. Being not satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, this Court is of the view that there is no urgency in the matter for bypassing the seniority of hearing of the present writ petition over the other writ petitions pending on the file of this Court.5. Accordingly, the present miscellaneous petition is dismissed. No costs.6. List the main writ petition in th...