Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Alphonsa Vs S. Sekar

Alphonsa vs S. Sekar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jul 29, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1819628

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/8589/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Alphonsa

Respondent

S. Sekar

Excerpt

c.m.p.no.8589 of 2025 in c.m.a.sr.no.32246 of 2025r.suresh kumar, j.andp. dhanabal, j.this petition is filed to condone the delay of 47 days in filing the appeal. heard mr.a.saravanan, learned counsel for the petitioner. learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo giving up the first respondent, which according to him is not a necessary party or a contesting party. the said memo is taken on record. in view of the same, the first respondent is removed from the array of parties. none appears for the second respondent though already having been served. the delay is only 47 days. having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 47 days in filing the appeal is condoned. accordingly, the petition stands ordered. (r.s.k., j) (p.d.b., j) 29.07.2025 drm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

C.M.P.No.8589 of 2025 in C.M.A.Sr.No.32246 of 2025

R.SURESH KUMAR, J.

AND

P. DHANABAL, J.

This petition is filed to condone the delay of 47 days in filing the appeal. Heard Mr.A.Saravanan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo giving up the first respondent, which according to him is not a necessary party or a contesting party. The said memo is taken on record. In view of the same, the first respondent is removed from the array of parties. None appears for the second respondent though already having been served. The delay is only 47 days. Having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 47 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Accordingly, the petition stands ordered. (R.S.K., J) (P.D.B., J) 29.07.2025 drm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2025 Same Parties Alphonsa vs S. Sekar Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar,Honourable Mr.Justice P...

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales