Chennai Court September 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. Vishnu Bargavi and Another Vs. The Director, NEET Exam, Delhi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-29-2016
(Prayers in W.P.No.31388 of 2016: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in Roll Number .86410498 (Application No.5039895), dated 16.08.2016 on the file of respondent and quash the same and further direct the respondent to change the category of the petitioner from "UR" to " "OBC" and in consequences thereof issue a certificate according to eligible category. W.P.No.31741 of 2016: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 30.08.2016 and to declare the petitioner as qualified in National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test - II (NEET-II0 2016, based on the marks secured by the petitioner in the category Other Backward Class (OBC) based on the Community Certificate submitted by the petitioner. W.P.No.33390 of 2016: This writ petition ...
M. Veerateeswaran Vs. The Collector-cum-The Excise Officer, Revenue De ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the first respondent from renewing the liquor licences in respect of the liquor shops run by respondents 2-4, in premises owned by this petitioner bearing Door No.284, Old Door No.5, TS No.96/1, 96/2 and 97/2, Bharathiar Road, Karaikal.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.D.Reena Ishwariya, learned Additional Government Pleader [Puducherry] appearing for the 1st and Mr.G.Ilanthirayan, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 2 to 4. 2. The petitioner seeks for a writ of mandamus, forbearing the 1st respondent from renewing the liquor licences in respect of the liquor shops run by respondents 2-4, in premises owned by this petitioner bearing Door No.284, Old Door No.5, TS No.96/1, 96/2 and 97/2, Bharathiar Road, Karaikal. 3. The petitioner is the owner of the premises bearing Door No.284, Old Door No.5, TS No.96/1, 96/2 and 97/2, Bharathiar...
The Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer Arulmighu Dhandayuthapani Swa ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-29-2016
(Prayer: Prayer in C.R.P(NPD)(MD)No.1970 of 2016: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to direct the learned District Munsif , Palani to number the returned petition dated 1.10.2015 in E.A.SR.No.6292 of 2015 in E.P.No.155 of 2002 in O.S.No.465 of 1986, on its file. Prayer in C.R.P(NPD)(MD)No.1971 of 2016: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to direct the learned District Munsif, Palani to number the returned petition dated 1.10.2015 in E.A.SR.No.6293 of 2015 in E.P.No.80 of 2002 in O.S.No.449 of 2002, on its file. Prayer in C.R.P(NPD)(MD)No.1972 of 2016: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to direct the learned District Munsif, Palani to number the returned petition dated 1.10.2015 in E.A.SR.No.6295 of 2015 in E.P.No.97 of 2008 in O.S.No.370 of 1998, on its file.) Common Order 1. These Civil Revision Petiti...
Dr.P. Ramar Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary to Gove ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-29-2016
(Prayers in W.P(MD)No.8676 of 2008 : Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned order vide G.O(D)No.224, Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries (AH-1) Department, dated 01.07.2008 passed by the first respondent. W.P(MD)No.8001 of 2010 : Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent to include the petitioner's name in the promotional panel prepared by the Department for 2009 and promote the petitioner placing his name above his immediate junior.) Common Order 1. The writ petition in W.P(MD)No.8676 of 2008 has been filed to challenge the impugned order vide G.O(D)No.224, Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries (AH-1) Department, dated 01.07.2008 passed by the first respondent. 2. The writ petition in W.P(MD)No.8001 of 2010 has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent ...
Selvam and Others Vs. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Erode ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-29-2016
(Prayers in Criminal Appeal No.159 of 2016: Criminal Appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to call for the records on the file of the Sessions Court (Mahalir Fast Track Court), Erode and set aside the same. Criminal Appeal No.215 of 2016: Criminal Appeal under Section 374 (2) of Cr.P.C., to call for the records relating to the judgment dated 27-01-2006 made in S.C.No.2 of 2015 on the file of the Sessions Court (Mahalir Fast Track Court),Erode and set aside the same.) Common Judgment: 1. These criminal appeals are directed against the convictions and sentences, dated 27-01-2016 passed in Sessions Case No.2 of 2015 by the Additional District/ Mahalir Neethi Manram, Erode. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the first accused by name Dhanaselvi is a sister of deceased Ranganayaki. The defacto complainant, by name Sukumar, is the son of the deceased and one Panchalingam is her husband. A dispute has arisen in between deceased and first accused in respect of...
M. Devadasan Vs. The Management, M/s. Southern Railways Ltd, Kochadai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 29.10.2011 made in W.P.(MD).No.1577of 2009. Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 19.10.2010 made in W.P.(MD).No.1592of 2009.) Common Judgment: M. Sathyanarayanan, J. 1. Since the issue involved in both the Writ Appeals is similar, by consent, they are taken up together and disposed of, by this common judgment. 2. The appellant herein filed W.P.(MD).No.1577 of 2009 praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the order of the second respondent therein, namely, the Controlling Authority, under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Madurai, to call for the records relating to the order in P.G.Appeal No.34 of 2008 and 49/2008 dated 10.12.2008 and quash the same. Similarly, the appellant had also preferred W.P.(MD).No.1592 of 2009 praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to remit the contribution...
V. Ashhokan and Others Vs. The Secretary to Government, Housing and Ur ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-29-2016
(Prayer in WP(MD)No.6199 of 2016:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in respect of the impugned orders in letter No.1342/tP/T/r/1/2015-2 dated 15.06.2015, passed by the 1st respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the 5th respondent Society to drop the proposal of constructing multi-storied building with 40 flats in Plot No.400, 401 and 402 of NGGO Colony, Alwar Nagar, after demolishing existing Community Hall situated on the Wellington Road (Keela Kuyil Kudi Road). Prayer in WP(MD)No.12793 of 2016:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Declaration, to declare the Resolution passed by the Respondent No.6 vide Resolution No.09/2016 dated 26.02.2016 and the Building Plan Approval issued by the Respondent No.6 vide Plan No.17/2016 dated 17.03.2016 for the construction of multi-storied building in Plot No.400, 401...
M/s. Cambridge Solutions Limited, Bangalore Vs. Global Software Limite ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-28-2016
(Prayer: These Original Side Appeals are filed against the order and decreetal orders, dated 30.09.2008 made in A.No.339 of 2008 in CS.No.765 of 2007 and dated 23.12.2010 made in OA.No.1034 of 2007 in CS.No.765 of 2007 by the learned single judge of this Court, respectively.) R. Mahadevan, J. 1. OSA.No.4 of 2010 is filed against the order and decreetal order, dated 30.09.2008, made in A.No.339 of 2008 in CS.No.765 of 2007 by the learned single judge of this Court, dismissing the application. OSA.No.317 of 2011 is filed against the order and decreetal order, dated 23.12.2010, made in OA.No.1034 of 2007 in CS.No.765 of 2007 by the learned single judge of this Court. 2. The appellant herein in both the appeals is the 1st defendant in the above suit and the applicant in A.No.339 of 2008 filed to reject the plaint, contending that the suit is not maintainable. The appellant was the 1st respondent in OA.No.1034/2007 filed by the plaintiff. The said application was filed to restrain the appel...
Pee and Dee Lands Holdings Private Limited Vs. The District Revenue Of ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-28-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records bearing reference K.Dis.No.J2/22026/12, dated 07.01.2013 and quash the same as illegal, incompetent and without jurisdiction and further confirm the grant of patta in CA.58 of 2012, dated 13.01.2012.) 1. The petitioner/Private Limited Company challenges the proceedings of the first respondent, dated 07.01.2013, in and by which, the patta granted in favour of the petitioner in C.A.No.58/2012, dated 13.01.2012, has been cancelled and further direction was issued to restore the same to it's original entry and the Tahsildar, Mylapore-Triplicane Taluk - the second respondent herein, was directed to carry out the changes in terms of the said order. 2. The petitioner - the Chairman and Managing Director of the Company, in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, would aver that it is a well known Company and has been in the business of realtor...
Sivaprakasam Vs. Rajendran
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-28-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to set aside the fair and decretal order passed in I.A.No.66 of 2015 in O.S.No.185 of 2006, dated 4.12.2005, on the file of the II Additional District Munsif cum-Judicial Magistrate No.I, at Kumbakonam.) 1. This revision is filed against the order passed in I.A.No.66 of 2015 in O.S.No.185 of 2006, dated 4.12.2005, on the file of the II Additional District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate No.I, at Kumbakonam, filed under Order 13 Rule 10 and Section 151 of C.P.C., to send for the original sale deed duly signed by the respondent on 12.10.1995 filed in appeal No.2 of 1996 before the District Registrar, Thanjavur, now at Kumbakonam. 2. The said document was sent for to the Civil Court by a court summons and the said sale deed is necessary for trial. Therefore the Petitioner/Plaintiff prayed to send for the documents. The respondent herein objected for the same on the ground that the said...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »