Chennai Court September 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. Vijayakumar Vs. The Chief Electoral Officer, Tamil Nadu Election Co ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-28-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent not to change the post of Chairman of Paravai Town Panchayat now under General category into Scheduled Tribe category by considering the representation sent by the petitioner, dated 21.09.2016, within the time period stipulated by this Court.) V.M. Velumani, J. 1. This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the first respondent not to change the post of Chairman of Paravai Town Panchayat, now under General category into Scheduled Tribe category, by considering the representation sent by the petitioner, dated 21.09.2016, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. According to the petitioner, he is a resident of No.42, Amman Kovil Street, Oormechikulam, Paravai Town Panchayat, Madurai North Taluk. He is a socially conscious person involving himself in common issues affecting the public in general and belongs to general category in terms ...
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Tirupur Vs. Machakalai and Oth ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-28-2016
(Prayer in both cases: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 04.03.2014 made in M.C.O.P.No.530/2013 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (II Additional District Judge), Tirupur.) 1. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation has filed the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, challenging the correctness of the impugned award dated 04.03.2014 made in M.C.O.P.No.530/2013 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (II Additional District Judge), Tirupur. 2. The case of the claimants is that on 25.02.2013 at about 20.30 hours, when the deceased trying to enter into a bus, bearing Registration No.TN 39 N 0037, came from Ottansattram to Tirupur, the driver of the bus, after seeing that the passenger was proceeding into the bus, drove the bus rashly, as a result the deceased fell down and sustained fatal injuries and died. According to the claimants, the accident was happened due to the rash a...
S. Durairaj Vs. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-28-2016
(Prayer: Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment dated 09.10.2015, made in S.C.No. 216 of 2011, on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, Thoothukudi. S. Nagamuthu, J 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.216 of 2011 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Thoothukudi. He stood charged for the offences punishable under Sections 450, 302 and 506(ii) of the Indian Penal Code. By judgment dated 09.10.2015, the Trial Court convicted the accused only under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. The Trial Court acquitted the accused from the charges under Sections 450 and 506(ii) of the Indian Penal Code. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court with this appeal. 2. The case of t...
Senthilkumar Vs. Krishnaveni
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-28-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to direct the learned Subordinate Judge, Pudukkottai to dispose of the case in H.M.O.P.No.115 of 2012 as expeditiously as possible.) 1. The revision petitioner has filed the above C.R.P praying this Court to direct the learned Subordinate Judge, Pudukkottai to dispose of the case in H.M.O.P.No.115 of 2012, as expeditiously as possible. 2. According to the learned counsel for the Petitioner, the marriage between the Petitioner and respondent was solemnized on 24.10.2007 according to Hindu rites and customs. After marriage, due to difference of opinion, the respondent had filed H.M.O.P.No.115 of 2012 for divorce before the learned Subordinate Judge, Pudukkottai. The said divorce petition was filed in the month of June 2012.The respondent had also filed a counter affidavit in the month of August 2014 and for the last four years, the said H.M.O.P has been pending before the Court below...
Valliappan Vs. State, Rep by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-28-2016
(Prayer: Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment and conviction dated 17.12.2014 made in S.C.No. 105 of 2011 on the file of the learned District Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Pudukkottai.) 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No. 105 of 2011, on the file of the learned District Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Pudukkottai. He stood charged for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 404 of the Indian Penal Code. By Judgment dated 17.12.2014, the Trial Court has convicted the appellant, as detailed below:- AccusedSection of LawSentenceFine amount1302 IPCTo undergo imprisonment for lifeRs.1,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.2404 IPCTo undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months. As against the said conviction and sentence, the appellant has come up with this Criminal Appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follo...
The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Vannarape ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-28-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 28.03.2012 passed in M.C.O.P.No. 17 of 2009 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Sub-Court, Ambasamudram.) V.M. Velumani, J. 1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 28.03.2012 passed in M.C.O.P.No.17 of 2009 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Sub-Court, Ambasamudram. 2. The facts in brief leading to the filing of this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, are as follows: (i) The appellant is the first respondent and the respondents 1 to 5 are the claimants and the sixth respondent/driver of the appellant Transport Corporation bus is the second respondent in M.C.O.P.No.17 of 2009 on the file of the Court of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Sub-Court), Ambasamudram. The respondents 1 to 5 filed a claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.17 of 2009 against the appellant and the sixth respondent, claiming a sum of Rs.95,67,160...
P. Raghupathy Vs. The Chairman, Postal Services Board, Union of India ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-28-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 6th respondent in O.A.No.34 of 2013, dated 23.07.2014, quash the same and consequently, to direct the respondents 1 to 5 to appoint the petitioner as GDS on compassionate grounds.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Challenge in this writ petition is to an order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, Chennai, in O.A.No.34 of 2013, dated 23.07.2014, by which, the Tribunal has declined to quash the orders of the Chief Postmaster General, Tamil Nadu Circle, Chennai, the 2nd respondent herein, made in No.REP/36/60/03, dated 07.04.2004 and No.REP/36-GDS/MOC/2012, dated 15.11.2012 and the order of the Superintendent of Post Offices, Dindigul Division, Dindigul, 4th respondent herein, made in No.BII/RELXN/PR, dated 14.03.2012 and consequently, declined to issue any direction to respondents 1 to 5, to appoint the petitioner as Gramin ...
M/s. Shriram EPC Limited, Chennai Vs. M/s. Rioglass Solar SA, Spain an ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-27-2016
(Prayer: Original Petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside the Award dated 12.2.2015 passed by the 4th Respondent and for further orders.) 1. This original petition has been filed by M/s.Shriram EPC Limited, Chennai, with a prayer to set aside the Foreign Award dated 12.2.2015 passed by the 4th respondent, namely Arbitral Tribunal International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), Paris, France. 2. Facts leading to the filing of this original petition are that Shriram EPC Limited, Chennai, is a public limited company, engaged in the business of providing end to end solutions offering Multi-disciplinary design, engineering, procurement, construction and project management services, providing turnkey solutions for ferrous and non ferrous, cement, etc. It is a listed company both in the Bombay Stock Exchange Limited and the National Stock Exchange of India Limited. 3. The first respondent, M/s.Rioglass Solar SA, is a company registered under the Law...
Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-27-2016
M. Venugopal, J. 1. Heard both sides. 2. The Petitioner / Appellant / Accused has preferred the present Criminal Appeal before this Court (as an aggrieved person) as against the Judgment dated 30.08.2016 in S.C.No.3 of 2016 passed by the Learned Mahila Judge (Fast Track Court) Udhagamandalam, Nilgiris District. 3. It comes to be known that the Petitioner / Appellant / Accused was found not guilty in respect of an offence under Section 447 of IPC. In respect of an offence under Section 3(i) of Tamilnadu Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act he was found guilty and was convicted and sentenced to undergo one year Rigorous Imprisonment and was also directed to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), in payment of default of fine, he was directed to undergo three months Simple Imprisonment. In respect of offence under Section 506(ii) of IPC, he was found guilty and was imposed with a fine of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One thousand only) in default of payment of fine, he was dir...
C. Ramesh Vs. The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for impugned selection list published by the 1st respondent dated 04.07.2016 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to redrawn the selection list for the post of Director of Physical Education with eligible candidates.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to quash the impugned selection list dated 04.07.2016 of the 1st respondent for the post of Director of Physical Education with consequential direction to the 1st respondent to redraw the selection list for the post of Director of Physical Education with eligible candidates. 2. Heard the learned counsel on either side. 3. The case of the petitioner is that he has completed B.A.Economics in the year 2000, B.PEd in 2003 and M.PEd in 2005 and M.Phil in 2006 in addition to completion of Ph.D. and NET examination; that before the petitioner acquired the qualification of NET, the...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »