Chennai Court September 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/s. Neycer India Limited Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-27-2016
(Prayer: Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records comprised in the impugned bank attachment order, in Form U in Rc.A3/724/2016, dated 02.09.2016 on the file of the second respondent, quash the same and to direct the second respondent to dispose the rectification petitions filed against TNGST assessment order, dated 11.05.2011.) 1. Heard Mr.B.Kumar, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr.T.Shanmugam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, learned Additional Government Pleader (Taxes) for respondents, in both the writ petitions. By consent of the learned counsel for both sides, the writ petitions are taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner, in both these writ petitions, is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at Chennai and its factory at Vadalur, Cuddalore District. In these writ petitions, the p...
Kamaraj Vs. State Rep by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Karur Distri ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-27-2016
(Prayer: Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment and conviction dated 10.03.2014 made in S.C.No.18 of 2012 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Karur. S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the second accused in S.C.No.18 of 2011, on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Karur. The Trial Court framed as many as eight charges against all the three accused, as detailed below. ChargeAccusedPenal Provisions11 to 3449 IPC21302 IPC32 and 3302 r/w 34 IPC41302 IPC52 and 3302 r/w 34 IPC61302 IPC72302 r/w 34 IPC81 to 3394 r/w 397 The first accused was one Mr.V.Santhanam @ Manojkumar. During the pendency of trial, the first accused died and thus, the charges against him stood abated. 2.By Judgment dated 10.03.2014, the Trial Court has convicted the accused Nos.2 and 3 under all the charges and accordingly punished them, as detailed below. AccusedSection of LawSentenceFine amount2 and 3449 IPCTo undergo imprisonment for lif...
P. Jaisanker Vs. The Executive Officer, Udangudi Town Panchayat, Tutic ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the Respondent in Na.Ka.No.281/15 dated 04.08.2016 and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service as Sanitary Worker with all consequential and other attendant benefits.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to quash the impugned order dated 04.08.2016 passed by the respondent in Na.Ka.No.281/15, by which, the petitioner was suspended from service as per Rule 5(b) of Town Panchayat Employees (DandA) Rules, 1988. The petitioner also sought direction to the respondent to reinstate him into service as sanitary worker with all consequential and other attendant benefits. 2. Heard the learned counsel on either side. 3. The case of the petitioner is that he belongs to Backward Community and is a graduate in B.Sc. (Physics); that he is suf...
The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Secretary, Chennai and Oth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-27-2016
(Prayer: Appeals filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the common order dated 17.04.2014, made in W.P.(MD)Nos. 8872 and 8873 of 2012.) Common Judgment V.M. Velumani, J. 1. These Writ Appeals have been filed challenging the common order of the learned Single Judge, dated 17.04.2014, made in W.P. (MD)Nos.8872 and 8873 of 2012. 2. Since common issues are involved in these writ appeals, they are heard together and disposed of by this common Judgment. 3. The facts of the case:- (i) According to the respondents, the first appellant sanctioned various posts to five newly established Medical Colleges all over Tamil Nadu, i.e., Tirunelveli, Tuticorin, Vellore, Kanyakumari and the third appellant College. The respondents were appointed as Sweepers on consolidated pay in the third appellant College, by the proceedings of the Dean of the College, in Na.Ka.No.5972-Ni.Pi 2/05, dated 28.02.2006 and the respondents joined service in the third appellant College on 13.09.2006. (ii) The ap...
Union of India, Represented by Government of Puducherry and Another Vs ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench passed in O.A.No.420 of 2012, dated 03-04-2013 and quash the same and pass further orders.) A. Selvam, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the Order dated 03-04-2013 passed in O.A.No.420 of 2012 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench and quash the same. 2. The respondents 2 to 4 as applicants have filed O.A.No.420 of 2012 on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench wherein the present petitioners and the fifth respondent have been shown as respondents. 3. It is averred in the Original Application, that the applicants have been appointed as Lecturers on consolidated pay on hourly basis during 2005. The applicants have possess...
K. Ravi Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Secretary to Governmen ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-27-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner for the post of Plot-watcher in the light of the order passed in W.P(MD)No. 4351 of 2010 dated 30.04.2013 with all monetary benefits.) 1. The petitioner seeks for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to regularize his service for the post of Plot-watcher in the light of the order passed in W.P(MD)No.4351 of 2010, dated 30.04.2013 with all monetary benefits. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. It is seen that the third respondent sent the proposal on 10.06.2015 to the second respondent to regularize the service of the petitioner along with others, in which, the serial No.24, the petitioner's name is find place. The said proposal is pending for more than 1-1/2 years. Therefore, the second responde...
M. Balasubramaniam Vs. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitabl ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-27-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the first respondent in R.P.No.3 of 2012, dated 25.03.2013 and quash the same.) This writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the first respondent dated 25.03.2013 setting aside the order passed by the second respondent and directing the third respondent to take necessary steps to lease out the property in dispute in public auction. 2. According to the petitioner, an extent of 10.52 acres of dry land in Survey Nos.179 and 180 of Krishnapuram Village, Tenkasi Taluk, Tirunelveli District belongs to the third respondent herein. The above said lands were leased out to the fourth respondent who is none other than the father of the writ petitioner. Since the fourth respondent committed some default in payment of rent and also attempted to convert the lands as cattle sandy, the third respondent filed a petition before the Joint Com...
S. Babu John Vs. The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporat ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to refer the petitioner to Medical Board to find out his disability and to provide him a suitable alternative permanent employment with pay protection, continuity of service, backwages and all other attendant benefits in accordance with Section 47(1) of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1955.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the respondent to refer the petitioner to Medical Board to find out the genuineness of the claim of disability and to provide him a suitable alternative permanent employment with pay protection, continuity of service, backwages and all other attendant benefits in accordance with Section 47(1) of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1955. 2. Mr.A.P.Muthupandian, learned counsel, t...
J. Vanitha Vs. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-27-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent, dated 26.07.2016 in D.No.1344/16.08.2016, quash the same and consequently, direct the respondent to permit the petitioner to participate the interview for the post of Office Assistant in Madurai District Court Recruitment 2016.) V.M. Velumani, J. 1. This Writ Petition has been filed to call for records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent, dated 26.07.2016, in D.No.1344/16.08.2016 and quash the same with the consequential direction to the respondent to permit the petitioner to participate in the Interview for the post of Office Assistant in Madurai District Court Recruitment 2016. 2. The petitioner is a Graduate in Bachelor of Science [Home Science] and registered her qualification in the District Employment Office at Madurai, vide Registration No.MDD1994F00003517...
Krishnamoorthy Vs. State of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Secretary to Govern ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-27-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the entire records in detention order passed in C.O.C.No.47/2016 dated 18.06.2016 on the file of the 2nd respondent herein and set aside the same as illegal and direct the respondents to produce the petitioner's wife namely Murugeswari, Wife of Krishnamoorthy, female aged 55 years, who is detained in Special Prison for Women, Tiruchirappalli before this Court and set her at liberty.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The petitioner is the wife of the detenue. He has been detained as per the order of the 2nd respondent under Section 2(b) of the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982, branding him as 'Bootlegger'. 2. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents and we have also perused the records carefully. 3. Though several grounds have been raised in the Habeas Corpus Petition, the learned counsel for the Petitioner would ma...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »