Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Suganya Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai and others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that this petitioner has given a complaint against Police Officials, in which, petition enquiry was conducted and the same was closed and there is no harassment to the petitioner as alleged by her. Recording the said submission, this petition is closed....
M/s. Goodway Plastics, Rep. by its Proprietor K.N. Mony Vs. The Managi ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the second respondent in his proceedings No. TIIC/NGL/LAO/20-12-2013 dated 26.04.2012 and quash the same on the ground that the same is arbitrary and illegal and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the second respondent in his proceedings No. TIIC/NGL/LAO/20-12-2013 dated 26.04.2012 and quash the same on the ground that the same is arbitrary and illegal. 2. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for the respondents brought to the notice of this Court that the TIIC already moved before the DRT against the collateral security in SAR.No.223 of 2...
Change India Rep. by its Director A. Narayanan and Another Vs. Governm ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus by calling for the records of the fourth respondent pertaining to their advertisement in Ref. No. MKU/R17/VC/2015 dated 31.5.2015 and quash the same and also directing the second respondent to comply with the provisions of UGC Act, 1956 and its Regulations 2010 read in the light of their G.O. (Ms) No. 350 dated 09.09.2009 and G.O. Ms. No. 78 dated 23.4.2015 for appointing Vice Chancellor.) Common Order: 1. Change India, a trust, Centre for Advocacy and Research in promoting the cause of democratisation of Society, Equity, Rule of Law, Human rights, Accountable Governance, Sustainable Development and Alternative Developmental models, and one Dr.M.Anandakrishnan, claiming to be a social worker interested in producing top quality of imparting teaching and learning, have filed these Writ Petitions in public interest, seeking to quash the advertisement dated 31.5.2...
Munivel @ Kutti Vs. State by Inspector of Police, Chennai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer:Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., against the judgment passed in S.C.No.375 of 2009 dated 01.03.2011 on the file of the learned VI Additional Sessions Judge (In the Court of Sessions at Chennai).) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.375 of 2009 on the file of the learned VI Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai. He stood charged for offence under Section 302 I.P.C. By judgment dated 01.03.2011, the trial Court convicted the accused for offence under Section 302 I.P.C., and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the accused/appellant is before this Court with this Criminal Appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows:- The deceased in this case was one Mr.Ravi. P.W.1 is his brother. P.W.2 is the wife of P.W.1. They were all residing at Chetpet, Chennai. The accused was their ...
Eswaran Vs. The Inspector of Police (Crime), Madurai City
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the complaint of one Ramanik Lal S/o.Rajendran.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the complaint of one Ramanik Lal S/o.Rajendran. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State and perused the materials placed on record. 3. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that, on the complaint given by one Ramanik Lal against this petitioner, petition enquiry is pending. 4. The petitioner is directed to participate in the enquiry and during enquiry, he shall not be harassed. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police is free to register an FIR and this order shall not be a shield for the petitioner against arrest. Wi...
P. Veerachamy Vs. State Represented by, The Superintendent of Police, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to further investigate the case in S.C.No.78 of 2014 pending before the Special Court of P.C.R.cases, Pudukkottai in Crime No.176 of 2013 on the file of the 3rd respondent Police and file additional final report before the concerned court.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the 2nd respondent to further investigate the case in S.C.No.78 of 2014 pending before the Special Court of P.C.R.cases, Pudukkottai in Crime No.176 of 2013 on the file of the 3rd respondent Police and file additional final report before the concerned court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. It is seen that for the incident that took place on 29.09.2013, the respondent police registered a case in Crime No.176 of 2013 and completed the investigation and also filed a final report, which was taken on file in S.C.No.78...
S. Naina Mohammed and Others Vs. The Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in Crime No.97 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to call for the records in Crime No.97 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same. 2. It is seen that a case in Crime No.97 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 379 (NH) IPC, has been registered against the petitioners / A1 to A4. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners/Accused and the second respondent, appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) through the respondent Police, namely, Mr.P.Thambidurai, Special Sub-Inspector of Police, Vachakarapatti Police Station, Virudhunagar District. Learned counsel appearing for the parties also endorsed the identify...
M.P. Karthikeyan Vs. The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Society, Kar ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records connected with Na.Ka.No.3626/2005/Saba dated 30.01.2012 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same as illegal and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records connected with Na.Ka.No.3626/2005/Saba dated 30.01.2012 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same as illegal. 2. The order impugned is a communication between the Deputy Registrar and the Superintendent of Police in respect of a complaint pursuant to the findings under Section 81 enquiry. 3. Though the writ petitioner challenged that order, in view of the non-payment of batta, the writ petition was dismissed as early as on 25.10.2013 as against the second respondent. But, even today, according to him, no action has been taken. 4. In view of the same, nothing...
Lakshmi and Another Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu rep by its Secretary t ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records relating to the detention order passed by the 2nd respondent pertaining to the order made in Memo No.751/BCDFGISSSV/2015 dated 17.8.2015 in detaining the detenu under 2(F) of the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 as a Goonda and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu Sathish son of Sampath aged about 24 years who is detained at Central Prison, Puzhal, before this Court and set him at liberty.) M. Jaichandren, J. 1. This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the mother of the detenu, namely, Sathish, aged 24 years, son of Sampath, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records in Memo No.751/BCDFGISSSV/2015 dated 17.8.2015, passed by the 2nd respondent, detaining the detenu, under Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goonda...
Jhansi Rani Versu State represented by The Inspector of Police, Dindig ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to file a final report before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Dindigul in Crime No.559 of 2014 pending on the file of the respondent police within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent to file a final report before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Dindigul in Crime No.559 of 2014 pending on the file of the respondent police. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that the investigation in Crime No.559 of 2014 has been completed and a final report has also been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2 (FAC), Dindigul on 16.03.2016, which was taken on file in C.C.No.102 of 2016. 3. Recording the said submission, this Criminal Original Petition is closed....