Chennai Court August 2015 Judgments
Pandian Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 31.08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (Md.No.9754 of 2014 Pandian ..Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti, Madurai District. 3.The Tahsildar, Usilampatti, Madurai District. 4.Palaniappan, S/o.Karuppana Thevar 5.Jeya, W/o.Palaniappan (R4 & R5 impleaded as per order of this Court, dated 17.10.2014, made in M.P.(Md.No.1 of 2014) ..Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to remove the encroachment made in Channel (Neerwarathu Odai) and Public Common Pathway at Survey Nos.150 and 157/6B respectively, situated at Seemanuthu Village, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District forthwith, in pursuance of the petitioner's representation, dated 07.06.2014. !For Petitioner : Mr.S.Balaji For Respondent...
Tag this Judgment!1.K.Muniyandi Vs. The State Rep by The
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31. 08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI CRL.A(MD).No.422 of 2010 1.K.Muniyandi 2.P.Paramasivam @ Paraman : Appellants Vs. The State rep by the Inspector of Police, Krishnankovil Police Station, Virudhunagar District, [Crime No.94 of 2007]. : Respondent PRAYER: Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment and conviction dated 30.10.2010 made in S.C.No.204 of 2007, on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Srivilliputtur, Virudhunagar District. !For Appellants : Mr.M.Ajmal Khan Senior Counsel For M/s.Ajmal Associates ^For Respondent : Mr.C.Mayil Vahana Rajendran Additional Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT [JUDGMENT of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J]. The appellants are the accused Nos.1 and 7 in S.C.No.204 of 2007, on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Srivilliputtur, Virudhunagar District. Including the appellants, there w...
Tag this Judgment!Al.Arunachalam Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 31.08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (Md.No.10864 of 2014 Al.Arunachalam ..Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District. 3.The Tahsildar, Alangudi Taluk, Pudukottai District. 4.The Executive Officer, Alangudi Town Panchayat, Pudukottai District. 5.C.Devaki 6.Murugan, S/o.Subbaiah 7.Safia Beevi, W/o.Sarpudeen Ravuthar ..Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to remove the encroachments and protect the public pathway, Water output Canal, in T.S.Nos.954 and 980 of Alangudi Town Panchayat, Pudukottai District, based on the third respondent's Letter in Na.Ka.No.14656/12(s).dated 24.01.2013 and the petitioner's representation, dat...
Tag this Judgment!1.Perumal Vs. The State,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31. 08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI CRIMINAL APPEAL (MD).No.421 of 2010 1.Perumal S/o.Mariappan 2.Perumal S/o.Raman 3.Gopal S/o.Raman 4.Senthil S/o.Karuppasamy : Appellants Vs. The State, Rep. by its Inspector of Police Palani Taluk Police Station Dindigul District. in Crime No.131 of 2009 :Respondent PRAYER: Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment passed by the Additional Sessions Judge cum Fast Track Court, Dindigul, in S.C.No.129 of 2010 dated 27.10.2010. !For Appellant : Mr.ARL.Sundaresan Senior counsel for M/s.AL.Gandhimathi ^For Respondent : Mr.C.Mayilvahana Rajendran Additional Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J.) The appellants are the accused in S.C.No.129 of 2010 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge, FTC, Dindigul. The trial Court framed as many as four charges...
Tag this Judgment!P.Ravi Joseph Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31.08.2015 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (Md.No.11083 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013 P.Ravi Joseph ..Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District. 3.The Tahsildar, Vilathikulam Taluk, Thoothukudi District. 4.The Executive Officer, Goundanpatti Panchayat, Goundanpatti, Vilathikulam Taluk, Thoothukudi District. 5.V.C.Kalimuthu ..Respondents Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents No.1 to 3 to remove the illegal encroachments made by the respondent No.5 in public pathway situated in South Street, Goundanpatti Village, Nagalapuram Post, Vilathikulam Taluk, Thoothukudi District. !For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For Respondents : Mr.M.Alagathevan, 1 to 4 Spl.Govt.Pleader. :ORD...
Tag this Judgment!A.Palaniraj Vs. 1.The Principal Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31. 08.2015 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.(MD)No.15105 of 2015 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2015 A.Palaniraj .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Environment and Forest (FR-1) Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai ?. 09. 2.The Principal Chief Conservator, Office of the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (Head of Forest Force) Panagal Maligai, Saidapet, Chennai ?.15. 3.Mr.Dr.V.K.Melkani, (in-charge), I.F.S., Principal Chief Conservator cum Chief Wild Life Warden, Office of the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (Head of Forest Force) Palangal Maligai, Saidapet, Chennai - 15 ..Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order bearing G.O.(D)No.171 Environment and Forest (FR.1) Department dated 18.08.2015 issued by the first respondent and quash...
Tag this Judgment!1.S.Varadharajan Vs. The Revenue Divisional officer,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:28. 08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH W.P.(MD)No.13088 of 2014 1.S.Varadharajan 2.S.Radhakrishnan 3.S.Shanthi 4.S.Jeyaratchagan 5.S.Vasantha Devi 6.Jayalakshmi 7.Padmavathi 8.Dhanalakshmi 9.Lakshmiammal ... Petitioners Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in Na.Ka.No.AA2/3307/2014 dated 04.07.2014, quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to disburse the compensation amount at Rs.1,200/-per cent together with all the statutory benefits due to the petitioners forthwith and pass further orders. !For Petitioners : Mr.A.Sivaji ^For Respondent : Mr.S.Kumar, AGP :ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in Na.Ka...
Tag this Judgment!S.Nagamani Vs. 1.The District Registrar of Societies,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:28. 08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH W.P.(MD).No.15288 of 2012 and W.P.(MD).No.2224 of 2015 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 & 2 /2012, 1 /2014 & 1 /2015 in W.P.(MD).No.15288 of 2014 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 to 8 of 2015 in W.P.(MD).No.2224 of 2015 W.P.(MD).No.15288 of 2014 S.Nagamani .... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Registrar of Societies, Virudhunagar-626 001. 2.The District Educational Officer, Virudhunagar-626 001. 3.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Virudhunagar. 4.R.M.Rengarajan, S/o.Muthuperumal, Soundi Street, Allamapatti, Virudhunagar. 5.P.Solaisamy, S/o.Ponniah, No.4, Velampoor Street, Alampatti, Virudhunagar. 6.M.Manisankar, S/o.Mallaiasamy, No.26, Mallappan Street, Allampatti, Virudhunagar. 7.N.Ashokkumar, S/o.Natarajan, No.2, Mallappan Street, Allampatti, Virudhunagar. 8.S.Rajendran, S/o.Somasundaram, No.21, Mallappan Street, Allampatti, Virudhunagar. 9.R.Gunasekaran, S/o.Ramasamy, Pound Street, Allampatti, Viru...
Tag this Judgment!John Ebenezer Vs. The Regional Passport officer,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:28. 08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH W.P.(MD)No.12285 of 2015 John Ebenezer ... Petitioner Vs. The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Kochadai, Madurai. ... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to process the petitioner's application and issue the passport by using the name of the step father Ebenezer John in the passport within a time frame. !For Petitioner : Mr.K.K.Senthil For respondent : Mr.G.R.Swaminathan for Mr.N.Shanmugaselvam SCCG :ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed praying for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to process the petitioner's application and issue the passport by using the name of the step father Ebenezer John in the passport within a time frame.2. The case of the petitioner is that out of the wedlock between Shasi and late Mr.L.Shanmukam, the petitioner was...
Tag this Judgment!1.Elayaraja Vs. The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI Crl.A(MD)No.297 of 2010 1.Elayaraja 2.Ravi .Appellants/ Accused 1 and 2 versus The Inspector of Police, S.P.Pattinam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. (Crime No.52 of 2008).Respondent/ Complainant PRAYER: Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment and conviction passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Ramathapuram, in S.C.No.42 of 2009, dated 23.07.2010. !For Appellants : Mr.G.Bhagavath Singh, ^For Respondent : Mr.A.Ramar, Addl. Public Prosecutor. :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by S.NAGAMUTHU, J.The appellants are the accused 1 and 2 in S.C.No.42 of 2009, on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Ramathapuram. Including the appellants, there were totally eleven accused in the case. The Trial Court framed as many as twelve charges against the accused. Finally,...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »