Skip to content

Chennai Court August 2015 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Aug 19 2015

P.Antro Vs. State Rep By

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-19-2015

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:19. 08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI CRL A(MD).No.377 of 2013 P.Antro : Appellant Vs. State rep by The Inspector of Police, Rajamangalam Police Station, [Eathamozhi Police Station, Crime No.98 of 2011]., Kanyakumari District. : Respondent PRAYER Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment and conviction dated 11.12.2012 made in S.C.No.67 of 2012, on the file of the District and Sessions Court, Kanyakumari Division at Nagercoil. !For Appellant : Mr.S.Durairaj ^For Respondent : Mr.A.Ramesh Additional Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT [JUDGMENT of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J]. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.67 of 2012, on the file of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari Division at Nagercoil. He stood charged for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. By Judgment dated 11....


Aug 19 2015

L.Murugesan Vs. 1.The District Collector,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-19-2015

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.08.2015 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (Md.No.14887 of 2015 L.Murugesan ..Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 3.The Tahsildar, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai. 4.Meenakshi, W/o.(Late) Veeranan ..Respondents Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachment put-up by the 4th respondent in Survey Nos.289/36, 289/37, 289/42 & 289/43 in Sivialpatti Village, Kandangipatti Village Panchayat, Sivagangai & Sivagangai District, within a time frame. !For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sathish Babu For Respondents : Mr.M.Alagadevan, 1 to 3 Spl.Govt.Pleader. :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by R.SUDHAKAR,J.The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition, praying f...


Aug 19 2015

R.Balamurugan Vs. 1 the Principal Secretary

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-19-2015

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (Md.No.6605 of 2013 R.BALAMURUGAN ..Petitioner versus 1 THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AADHI DRAVIDAR AND TRIBAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT STATE OF TAMILNADU, FORT ST. GEORGE CHENNAI600009. 2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR-CUM-DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR MADURAI DISTRICT. 3 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER USILAMPATTI REVENUE DIVISION MADURAI DISTRICT4THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE MADURAI DISTRICT. 5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SEKKAROORANI POLICE STATION MADURAI DISTRICT..Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 and 3 to provide release certificates to 42 released Bonded LabouRs.viz., 1.Arul Prakash (Male) aged about 10 yeaRs.2.Nanthakumar (Male)...


Aug 19 2015

Ac.Aavudaiyappan Vs. 1.The District Collector,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-19-2015

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:19.08.2015 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (Md.No.5764 of 2013 AC.Aavudaiyappan ..Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Tuticorin. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Thiruchendor, Tuticorin District. 3.The Executive Officer, Town Panchayat, Sathankulam, Tuticorin District. 4.Esakki Asari ..Respondents Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to take action on the representation, dated 08.01.2013, made by the petitioner against the fourth respondent. !For Petitioner : Mr.R.T.Arivukumar For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.A.K.Baskarapandian Spl.Govt.Pleader For Respondent 3 : Mr.T.R.Janardhanam For Respondent 4 : No Appearance :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by R.SUDHAKAR,J.Alleging that the 4th respondent has made encroachments in a public...


Aug 19 2015

S.Senthamilselvan Vs. 1 the District Collector

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-19-2015

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (Md.No.9044 of 2014 S.SENTHAMILSELVAN ..Petitioner versus 1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR COLLECTORATE COMPLEX, KOKIRAKULAM TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER COLLECTORATE COMPLEX, KOKIRAKULAM TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 3 THE THASILDAR TIRUENVELI TALUK TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 4 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (WATER RESOURCES) CHITRARU DIVISION, KUDIYIRUPPU, COURTLAM TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 5 BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER MANUR PANCHYATH UNION, MANUR POST TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 6 P. VELUSAMY @ VELUKONAR7M. PONUSAMY ..Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the fiRs.respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.02.2014 and also direct the 1st & 4th respondents to evict the encroachments made by the 6th & 7th...


Aug 19 2015

E.K.Ramadass Vs. 1.The District Collector,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-19-2015

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:19.08.2015 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (Md.No.4931 of 2013 & M.P.(Md.No.1 of 2013 E.K.Ramadass ..Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli ?. 620 001. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli ?. 620 001. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri Division, Musiri ?. 621 211, Tiruchirappalli District. 4.The Tahsildar, Thuraiyur Taluk, Thuraiyur ?. 621 210. 5.The President, Eragudi Village Panchayat, Eragudi, Thuraiyur Taluk 621 001. 6.Sivaraj ..Respondents Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to remove the encroachment committed by the 6th respondent in S.F.No.143, Eragudi Village, Thuraiyur Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District. !For Petitioner : Mr.S.K.Shankar Murali For Respondents : Mr.M.Alagathevan ...


Aug 19 2015

S.M.Anthony Muthu Vs. 1.The Principal Secretary to Government,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-19-2015

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:19. 08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.P.(MD)No.6788 of 2014 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 S.M.Anthony Muthu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nagercoil. 4.The Tahsildar, Agasteeswaram Taluk, Nagercoil. 5.The Commissioner, Nagercoil Municipality, Nagercoil. 6.R.Natesan 7.M.M.Sahul Hameed ... Respondents (R.6 & R.7 impleaded as party respondents vide order of this Court dated 19.08.2015 made in M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 in W.P(MD)No.6788 of 2014.) Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to retrieve the land in Old Survey Nos.3314, 3315, 3316, 3320, 3321, 3322, 3323, 3324, correlated to R.S.Nos.752/1, 752/4, 753/3, 741, 118/3, 119/...


Aug 18 2015

Jeyakumar Vs. State, Rep.By

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-18-2015

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.R.C.(MD)No.304 of 2010 Jeyakumar ..Petitioner -versus State, rep.by Inspector of Police, Swamimalai Police Station, Thanjavur District. (Cr.No.6 of 2007) ..Respondent Petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, against the judgment in C.A.No.77 of 2008 dated 26.03.2010 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge / Fast Track Court No.1, Thanjavur, confirming the conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur at Kumbakonam in S.C.No.63 of 2008, vide judgment dated 14.08.2008. !For petitioner : Mr.A.Thiruvadikumar ^For respondent : Mr.P.Kandasamy, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side) :ORDER Reserved on : 06.08.2015 Delivered on : 18.08.2015 ?.Criminal Justice System does not admit of 'pigeon-holding.' Life and the Law do not fall neatly into slots. When a Court starts laying down rules enumerated (1).(2).(3).(4) ...


Aug 18 2015

1.M.Murugeswari Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented By

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-18-2015

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA W.P(MD)No.8300 of 2015 and M.P(MD)No.1 and 2 of 2015 1.M.Murugeswari 2.Mani Murugesan ...Petitioners .versus The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Madurai Range, Central Prison Campus, Arasaradi, Madurai ?. 625 016. 2.The Superintendent of Prisons, Central Prison, Madurai ?. 625 016. 3.The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Vellore Range, Central Prison Campus, Vellore. 4.The Superintendent of Prisons, Central Prison, Cuddalore, Cuddalore..Respondents (Respondents 3 and 4 are impleaded as per order of this Court made in M.P(MD)No.3 of 2015, dated 18.8.2015) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in impugned order No.9373/Tha.Ku 2/2015, dated12.5.2015 passed by the second respondent and to quash the same as illeg...


Aug 18 2015

Kala @ Kavitha Vs. State Rep. By

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-18-2015

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:18. 08.2015 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.R.C.(MD) No.612 of 2007 Kala @ Kavitha ... Petitioner -vs- State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Ponmalai Police Station, Trichy District. Crime No.331 of 2004 ... Respondent Prayer Criminal Revision Petition has been filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., challenging the order passed by the I Additional District Judge, Trichy in C.A.No.84 of 2007 dated 21.07.2007, confirming the judgment passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Trichy in C.C.No.264 of 2006 dated 15.02.2007. !For Petitioner : Mr.J.Lawrance ^For Respondent : Mr.P.Kandasamy Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) :ORDER This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the order passed in C.A.No.84 of 2007 dated 21.07.2007 by the I Additional District Judge, Trichy, confirming the judgment passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Trichy in C.C.No.264 of 2006 dated 15.02.2007.2. Learned Judicial Magi...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial