Chennai Court August 2015 Judgments
Chandrabose Vs. 1.The Assistant Commissioner of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31. 08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA W.P.(MD)No.14740 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2015 Chandrabose : Petitioner Versus 1.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Annanagar (L&O) Range, Madurai City, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Puthur Police Station, Madurai. : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in C.No.09/Memo/AC-ANR/L&O/MC/15, dated 03.07.2015 and quash the same and consequently, direct the first respondent to close the history sheet. !For Petitioner : Mr.M.Subash Babu ^For Respondents : Mr.D.Muruganantham, Additional Government Pleader :ORDER The present Writ Petition has been filed to set aside the impugned order dated 03.07.2015 and also to direct the first respondent to close the history sheet.2. The learne...
Tag this Judgment!Kandasamy, S/O.Subban Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 31.08.2015 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (Md.No.2610 of 2014 Kandasamy, S/o.Subban ..Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 3.The Tahsildar, Natham Taluk, Dindigul District. 4.Palaniyammal, W/o.Late Periyapalani 5.Nagaraj, S/o.Late Periyapalani 6.Vellaiammal 7.Dhanaraj, S/o.Chandrasekar 8.Jeyaraj, S/o.Ponnan 9.Balu, S/o.Mani ..Respondents Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the illegal encroachments made by respondents 4 to 9 in Survey No.108/1 to an extent of 0.87.5 Ares, Natham Village, Dindigul District, based on the petitioner's representation, dated 31.01.2014, within a reasonable time, as may be fixed by this Co...
Tag this Judgment!Suresh Kumar Vs. The State Rep. By
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 31.08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI Crl.A(MD)No.383 of 2010 Suresh Kumar .Appellant/ FiRs.Accused versus The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Arumuganeri Police Station, Tuticorin District. (Crime No.70 of 2009).Respondent/ Complainant PRAYER: Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment and conviction passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.I, Tuticorin, in S.C.No.243 of 2009, dated 21.09.2010. !For Appellant : Mr.M.Ajmal Khan Senior Counsel for Mr.A.Velan for M/s.Ajmal Associates. ^For Respondent : Mr.A.Ramar, Addl. Public Prosecutor. :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by S.NAGAMUTHU, J.The appellant is the fiRs.accused in S.C.No.243 of 2009, on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.I, Tuticorin. One Mr.Ganesh was the second accused. The fiRs.accused stood ...
Tag this Judgment!The Federation of Consumer and Service Organisation, Vs. 1.The Distric ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 31.08.2015 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (Md.No.4468 of 2013 The Federation of Consumer and Service Organisation, rep.by its President M.Sekaran, Having Office at No.5, Fourth Street, Lakshmipuram, Tiruchirappallil-10..Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector, Trichy District. 2.The Chairman, National Highways Authority of India, New Delhi. 3.The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, Pon Nagar, Tiruchirappalli-620 001. 4.The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, Medical College Road, Thanjavur..Respondents Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to fix time limit to complete the following works: i)to provide continuous service roads, without any interruption upto the end of City Limit, as per NHAI NorMs.including Railway Lines and RiveRs...
Tag this Judgment!V.Petchiammal @ Karthiyayini Natchiar Vs. 1.The Sub Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 31.08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH Writ Petition(MD).No.15703 of 2015 and M.P.(Md.No.1 of 2015 V.Petchiammal @ Karthiyayini Natchiar ..Petitioner Vs 1.The Sub Collector, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. 2.A.Sivagnana Pandian 3.The Tahsildar, Kadaladi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District..Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the orders of the 1st respondent made in Mu.Mu.A4/5872/2009, dated 25.03.2015 and the subsequent order of the 3rd respondent vide O.M.B2/5686/2015 dated 30.06.2015 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st and 3rd respondents to include the name of the Petitioner along with the 2nd Respondent in the revenue records relating to S.Nos.510/1 and 511/28 of Sayalkudi Village, Kadaladi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. !For petitioner : Mr.K.Govindarajan ^For respond...
Tag this Judgment!S.N.Udayar Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 31.08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (Md.No.15420 of 2012 S.N.Udayar ..Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector, Tuticorin District. 2.The Commissioner, Tuticorin Municipal Corporation, Tuticorin. 3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Tuticorin..Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the fiRs.respondent to remove the illegal constructions and evict the encroachments in Revenue Survey No.858 of Meelavittan Village of Sivanthakulam Middle Street of Tuticorin Town. !For Petitioner : Mr.S.Muthalraj For Respondent Nos.1 & 3 : Mr.M.Alagathevan Special Government Pleader For Respondent No.2 : Mr.S.Saji Bino :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by R.SUDHAKAR,J.) The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition seeking for a direction to the fiRs.respondent to remove the illegal co...
Tag this Judgment!S.Thirumurugan Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 31.08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (Md.No.10297 of 2014 S.Thirumurugan ..Petitioner versus 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its District Collector, Trichirappalli. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri, Trichy District. 3.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Trichirappalli. 4.The Tahsildar, Thuraiyur, Trichy District. 5.Krishnamoorthy ..Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 15.05.2014, regarding eviction of the fifth respondent, as per orders of this Court in Contempt Petition No.132 of 2012 in W.P.(Md.No.9535 of 2011, dated 31.08.2012. !For Petitioner : Mr.V.Singan ^For Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : Mr.M.Alagathevan Special Government Pleader :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by R.SUDHAKA...
Tag this Judgment!M.Karuthapandi Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 31.08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (Md.No.10140 of 2014 M.Karuthapandi ..Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai ?. 625 020. 2.The Tahsildar, Perayoor Taluk, Perayoor, Madurai District. 3.The Deputy Tahsildar, Sedapatti, Perayoor Taluk, Perayoor, Madurai District..Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the fiRs.respondent to remove all the encroachments made in pathway situated in Survey No.90/2, Athikaripatti Village, Perayur Taluk, Madurai District, based upon the representation, dated 13.12.2013 and the proceedings of the fiRs.respondent, dated 29.01.2014 and the proceedings of the second respondent, dated 10.03.2014. !For Petitioner : Mr.K.K.Kannan For Respondents : Mr.M.Alagathevan Special Government Pleader :ORDER (Order of the Court wa...
Tag this Judgment!K.Balasekar Vs. State, Represented By
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :31. 08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI CRL.A(MD).No.228 of 2008 #K.Balasekar : Appellant Vs. State, Represented by Inspector of Police, Bodi Town Police Station, Crime No.528 of 2006. : Respondent PRAYER: Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment and conviction dated 14.03.2008 made in S.C.No.42 of 2007, on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge [Fast Track Court]. Periyakulam. !For Appellant : Mr.P.Andiraj ^For Respondent : Mr.C.Mayil Vahana Rajendran Additional Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT [JUDGMENT of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J]. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.42 of 2007, on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge [Fast Track Court]. Periyakulam. He stood charged for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. By Judgment dated 14.03.2008, the Trial Court has ...
Tag this Judgment!Pandian Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 31.08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (Md.No.9754 of 2014 Pandian ..Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti, Madurai District. 3.The Tahsildar, Usilampatti, Madurai District. 4.Palaniappan, S/o.Karuppana Thevar 5.Jeya, W/o.Palaniappan (R4 & R5 impleaded as per order of this Court, dated 17.10.2014, made in M.P.(Md.No.1 of 2014) ..Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to remove the encroachment made in Channel (Neerwarathu Odai) and Public Common Pathway at Survey Nos.150 and 157/6B respectively, situated at Seemanuthu Village, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District forthwith, in pursuance of the petitioner's representation, dated 07.06.2014. !For Petitioner : Mr.S.Balaji For Respondent...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »