Chennai Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
B.S.Mohan Vs. the District Collector, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-19-2012
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to prescribe the period of lease as 10 years, by complying Rule 8(8) of the Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, in respect of the virgin stone quarry measuring an extent of 5.00 hectares comprised in S.No.107 (Part) situated at Siruthamur Village, Uthiramerur Taluk, Kancheepuram District.O R D E R1. The Petitioner has projected the present Writ of Mandamus praying for an issuance of an order by this Court in directing the Respondents to prescribe the period of lease as 10 years, by complying Rule 8(8) of the Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, in respect of the virgin stone quarry measuring an extent of 5.00 hectares comprised in S.No.107 (Part) situated at Siruthamur Village, Uthiramerur Taluk, Kancheepuram District.2. According to the Petitioner, the First Respondent/District Collector, Kancheepuram issued a Notification in...
N.Ramalingam. Vs. the Administrator, Tamil Nadu State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-19-2012
Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, for the relief as stated therein.O R D E R1. The petitioner has filed the present Writ of Mandamus, praying for issuance of an order by this Court in directing the respondents to pay back wages from 28.10.2002 to 20.01.2005, Gratuity, Provident Fund amount, Pension and other terminal benefits.2. According to the petitioner, he joined the services of the second respondent as Conductor during the year 1973. He was dismissed in the year 1983. He was reappointed by virtue of Section 18(1) Settlement of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 on 27.04.1984.3. The petitioner was charge sheeted on 19.01.2000 for alleged irregularities in issuance of tickets, when he was employed as Conductor in Tirupathur Depot. The allegation against him was that he failed to issue ticket to six passengers and misappropriated the collected amount. Though he furnished his explanation on 08.02....
D.Sureshkumar Vs. the District Collector, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-19-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to conduct reaction to the newly constructed commercial shops of Odagathur Bus Stand Commercial Complex, first floor which was constructed under "Anna Marumalarchi" Project 2010-2011 after following due procedure established under law.O R D E R1. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to conduct re-auction to the newly constructed commercial shops of Odagathur Bus Stand Commercial Complex, first floor which was constructed under "Anna Marumalarchi" Project 2010-2011 after following due procedure established under law.2. Ms.V.M.Velumani, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.3. The learned Special Government Pleader on instruction states that the first respondent District Collector has cancelled earlier pub...
M. Arivusudar Vs. the Senior Regional Manager
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-19-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 1st respondent made in his proceedings No. PNR/RET dated 23.3.2011 and proceedings No.CBRO/NS/RET dated 13.6.2011 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to issue letter of Intent to the petitioner to commencing his dealership for Vellichandai to Jittandahalli, Palacode Taluk, Dharmapuri District for petrol/diesel (MS.HSD) Retail outlet pursuant to the empanelment published by the 1st respondent for the above said area.O R D E R1. Heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents.2. It has been stated that the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as "HPCL ), had invited applications for the appointment of petrol/diesel retail outlet dealers for the Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry Region, by way...
C.Chinnadurai Vs. the Estate Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-19-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the order dated 19.08.2011 in proceedings No. FHMC3/7268/07/E on the file of the Respondent and quash the same and consequently forbear the Respondent from evicting the petitioner from the premises admeasuring 133 sq.Mtrs. (Near Sagar Ice Factory), Chennai Fishing Harbour Complex, Kasimedu, Royapuram, Chennai-13 without providing appropriate alternate accommodation within the said fishing harbour.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent.2. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the respondent does not have the jurisdiction to pass the impugned order, dated 19.8.2011, holding that the petitioner is an unauthorised occupant of the premises in question. The respondent has passed the impugned order, dated 19.8.2011, under Sub Sec...
Madurai K.K.Nagar Veetu. Vs. Madurai City Municipal.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-19-2012
PrayerWrit Appeal in W.A.(MD) No.1718 of 2011 is filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the Order dated 16.12.2011 made in W.P.(MD) No.3332 of 2006 on the file of this Court.Writ Appeal in W.A.(MD) No.234 of 2012 is filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the Order dated 16.12.2011 made in W.P.(MD) No.410 of 2012 on the file of this Court.Writ Appeal in W.A.(MD) No.383 of 2012 is filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the Order dated 18.1.2012 made in W.P.(MD) No.6922 of 2008 on the file of this Court.Writ Petition in W.P.(MD) No.5396 of 2011 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for the relief of issuance of writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents from in any manner demanding drainage deposit or contribution or drainage maintenance charges in respect of the houses of the members Poonga Nagar Residents Welfare Association (L.I.G.Colony) at K.K.Nagar, Madurai Town.COMMON JUDGMENTR.BANUMATHI,J.1. Whether Madurai City Municipal Corpo...
The President, Gangaikondan. Vs. the Chief Engineer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-19-2012
PRAYERWrit petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus forbearing the 5th respondent from taking any steps like installing, operating, commissioning their wind mills within the Gangaikondan Panchayat Jurisdiction, Tirunelveli District without getting permission of Gangaikondan Panchayat in terms of the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act, 1994 and the rules framed thereunder.ORDER1. The petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition for a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the fifth respondent from taking any steps like installing, operating, commissioning their wind mills within the Gangaikondan Panchayat Jurisdiction, Tirunelveli District, without getting permission from Gangaikondan Panchayat in terms of the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994, [for brevity, the Act] and the Rules framed thereunder.2. The facts of the case, as stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, in a nutshell, are ...
Pavithra Alias Swathi. Vs. the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-19-2012
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. To direct the first respondent/complainant to produce the C.D. File of the Crime No.540 of 2009 before this Court and order the second respondent The Superintendent of Vigilance Home, Mylapore, Chennai 4 to produce the petitioner before this Court and to set her at liberty or to send her to help NGO Organisation at Andhra Pradesh.ORDER1. Poverty is no sin. It is agonising that the haves, at times, sin the poor by turning their nelson's eye to their miseries. The story of the petitioner is an illustration of the latter. This young woman, born to poor parents, married at an young age, but deserted by her husband, having a child, under the guise of offering a decent domestic job, was taken to Chennai and attempted to be pushed into immoral trafficking, but, fortunately, rescued by the police. She has been in Protective Home for the past 34 months on the repeated orders of the Magistrate. Seeking to set aside the proceedings of the...
R.KanthA. Vs. the Chief Executive Engineer and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-19-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to provide Electricity connection to the petitioner residing in survey No.182/1 within the time limit fixed by this Court.O R D E R1. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to provide Electricity connection to the petitioner residing in survey No.182/1 within the time limit fixed by this Court.2. Mr.P.Gunaraj, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.3. Petitioner made a representation dated 4.4.2012 to the second respondent requesting electricity service connection. She also claims that she is afflicted with HIV. She, therefore, prays for early electricity supply.4. Mr.P.Gunaraj, learned counsel appearing for the respondents states that the third respondent is the competent authority and the authority will consider t...
R.Chandrajini Vs. the Director of Agriculture Marketing and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-19-2012
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the impugned order dated 07.06.2002 of the first respondent vide ref. No.A.O.NI.No.6103/2001.O R D E R1. The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the impugned order dated 07.06.2002 vide ref. No.A.O.NI.No.6103/2001 passed by the Director of Agriculture Marketing and Commerical Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board.2. The impugned order is only an information to the petitioner, that the departmental proceedings and vigilance enquiry was pending against him, therefore, at this stage, the review petition was not competent.3. For the reasons best known to the petitioner, he has not chosen to challenge the adverse order passed against him, and has chosen to challenge the order refusing to entertain review petition.4. It is pleaded case of the petitioner that he is working as Assistant Agriculture Officer...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »