Chennai Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ms.C.P.R.Textiles (P) Ltd. Vs. Superintendent of Market
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-20-2012
Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.11.2006.O R D E R1. The petitioner has projected this Writ of Mandamus praying for issuance of an order by this Court in directing the respondent to consider its representation, dated 23.11.2006.2. The Respondent/Superintendent, Marketing Committee, Udumalpet, has issued a notice, dated 29.08.2006, addressed to the petitioner calling upon it to submit a copy of the agreement made by it and Super Spinning Mills, if any, for perusal of its office so that it will be able to know the nature of transaction, viz., change of place of ownership of cotton. Further, it also stated that if agreement is not made, then it directed the petitioner to report where ownership of cotton is changed between it with due proof within fifteen days from the date of receipt of the notice etc.&n...
G. Prakasam Vs. the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-20-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records of the first respondent relating to the order passed in G.O.(D) No.496 Public Works (E2) Department dated 23.11.2006 and the consequential order in G.O.(D) No.499, Public Works (E2) Department dated 27.11.2006, quash the same and direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to retire from service. O R D E R1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner informs this Court that the writ petition has become an infructuous one and has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle. Recording the said fact, the writ petition is dismi...
D. Suba Sarguna Raja Pandi and ors. Vs. the Registrar of Co-operative ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-20-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to order and to conduct a fresh enquiry under Section 81 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act into the affairs of the 6th respondent Society.O R D E R1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle. Recording the said fact and granting permission to withdraw, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected M.P. is also dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs....
T.Rajendran Vs. Govt. of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-20-2012
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the order passed by the first respondent vide Lr.No.84234/T & A.II/2005-4 Finance (T & A.II) Department, dated 10.03.2006, Lr.No.72709/T&A1/2001, Finance (T & A) dated 1.03.2002 and for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to take into account the services rendered by the petitioner as Cashier from 23.05.1977 to 27.06.1981 and include his name in the panel for promotion as Accountant for the year 1983 in Cuddalore District Treasury unit and to give retrospective effect to his promotion as Accountant with all consequential benefits.O R D E R1. The petitioner was appointed as Cashier in the Finance (T & A.II) Department on 23.05.1977. The petitioner thereafter passed the qualifying examination conducted by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission for the post of Junior Assistant in the year 1980...
The President, Vs. the District Collector-cum and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-20-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to adjust a sum equivalent to the seigniorage fees collected by the Government from persons permitted to quarry for road materials in the land situated within the territory of Kandikuppam Village Panchayat to the Kandikuppm Village Panchayat funds within the time stipulated by this Court, in future permit the petitioner to collect seigniorage fee or dead rent as per rule 36(5)(bb) and proviso to Rule 36-B of the Tamilnadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 from persons permitted to quarry for road materials in the land situated within the territory of Kandikuppan Village Panchayat.O R D E R1. Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to adjust a sum equivalent to the seigniorage fees collected by the Government from persons permitted to quarry for road materials in the land situated within the territ...
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation. Vs. the Presiding Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-20-2012
Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, for the relief as stated therein.C O M M O N O R D E R1. The petitioner/Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Salem, in W.P.No.22671 of 2004, has preferred the present Writ of Certiorari, in calling for the records of the first respondent in I.D.No.141 of 1999, dated 15.07.2003 and to quash the same.2. The petitioner/workman in W.P.No.36896 of 2006 has preferred the Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, in calling for the records pertaining to the Award in I.D.No.141 of 1999 on the file of the Labour Court, Salem, dated 15.07.2003 and to quash that portion of the Award of the Labour Court which denies the relief of back wages and resultantly, to direct the Respondent/Management to pay back wages to him from the date of dismissal order dated 29.09.1998.3. The second respondent/workman (in W.P.No.22671 of 2004) was appointed as Driver in the Petitioner/T...
R.Natarajan. Vs. the District Collector, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-20-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records of the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.144/12/A3 dated 31.05.2012 and quash the same and thereby direct the third respondent to return the deposit amount of sum of Rs.100911/- to the petitioner and to receive the key of the shop 'A'.O R D E R1. Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records of the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.144/12/A3 dated 31.05.2012 and quash the same and thereby direct the third respondent to return the deposit amount of sum of Rs.1,00,911/- to the petitioner and to receive the key of the shop 'A'.2. Ms.V.M.Velumani, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.3. By order dated 12.3.2012, this Court in W.P.Nos.483 and 484 of 2012 declined to grant renewal of lease of...
Neelaram Matriculation Higher Secondary School. Vs. the Director of Ma ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-19-2012
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, calling for records on the file of the second respondent relating to the order issued in Na.Ka.No.325/2011 dated 05.07.2011 and quash the same and direct the respondents to grant renewal of recognition of the petitioner school in respect of standard I to XII for the period from 01.06.2009.O R D E R1. Neelaram Matriculation Higher Secondary School has invoked the extraordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court with prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, for quashing the impugned order dated 05.07.2011, issued vide Na.Ka.No.325/2011, with consequential relief of directing the respondents to grant renewal of recognition to the petitioner school.2. The petitioner School was established as Matriculation School with standard VI and VII in the year 1988. The formal permission for standard VI and VII was granted vide order dated 19.09.1988 and temporar...
K.Pandiyan. Vs. the Collector and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-19-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, call for the records relating to proceedings of the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.922/2012/A.1 dated 20.3.2012 and quash the same.O R D E R1. Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, call for the records relating to proceedings of the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.922/2012/A.1 dated 20.3.2012 and quash the same.2. Ms.V.M.Velumani, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for disposal.3. The impugned proceedings is a notice issued by the second respondent directing the petitioner to stop the offending business of gunny bag stating that the public have given their grievances against the conduct of the business of the petitioner. Since the impugned proceeding has been issued in the nature of notice, petitioner is directed to give a detailed representation/reply to the second responde...
K.Venkatesa Vs. the Secretary to Government and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-19-2012
Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of certiorified mandamus to call for the records in respect of the proceedings of the first respondent in letter ID No.664 dated 28.12.2001 communicated by the second respondent in end.2209/02(OM) dated 15.2.2002 and direct the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioner as Work Assistant / Technical Assistants in the respective Panchayat Union, from the date of their initial appointment, with all service benefits.O R D E R1. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer of issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioner, as work Assistants/ Technical Assistants in the respective Panchayat Union from the date of their initial appointment.2. It is not disputed that the petitioner was not appointed by following process of law, but were inducted in service by way of back door entry.3. The p...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »