Chennai Court April 2012 Judgments
Ms.Phoenix Conveyor Belt India (P) Ltd. Vs. the Chairman and Managing ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to confirm the tender bid of the petitioner dated 30.12.2011 and award the tender for supply of steel cord conveyor Belts for North Chennai Thermal Power Station.ORDER1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.2. This writ petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent, to confirm the tender bid of the petitioner dated, 30.12.2011, and to award the tender, for supply of Steel Cord Conveyor Belts, for North Chennai Thermal Power Station, in favour of the petitioner.3. It had been stated that the petitioner is a leading manufacturer of Steel Cord Conveyor Belts in India. The petitioner had carried out several contracts, in supplying Steel Cord Conveyor Belts, relating ...
Tag this Judgment!S.Balan. Vs. the Principal Secretary to Government.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
Prayer:- Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to quash the order passed by the first respondent vide letter No.13118/CD1/2006-11 dated 28.9.2010.COMMON ORDER1. As the common question of law and facts are involved in these writ petitions, these are being disposed of by common order.For the sake of brevity, the facts are taken from W.P.No.23303 of 2011.2. The petitioner joined as Village Administrative Officer on 12.03.1984 in the Revenue department. The petitioner was allotted to Coimbatore District. The petitioner was later on allotted to Pollachi Division, and on 12.03.1984 joined at Thenkarai Village, Coimbatore Taluk. The petitioner was to retire on 31.03.2012.3. The petitioner was served with charge memo vide Lr.No.13118/CD1/2006-10 dated 28.9.2010 which was served on the petitioner on 6.10.2010. The petitioner was charged with the misconduct of issuing certificate showing false and boosted quantity of...
Tag this Judgment!Latha Vs. the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
PrayerWrit Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus directing the respondents to produce the body and person of the Petitioner's husband by name Kundumani @ Pitchai Kani, son of Chinnasamy, aged about 45 years (now confined at Madurai Central Prison as life convict) before this Court and set him at liberty, by extending the benefits to the detenu under Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act.ORDER(Order of the Court was made by S.RAJESWARAN,J)1. The petitioner is the wife of one Kundumani, who is one of the convict in S.C.Nos.56 and 57 of 1985 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Madurai North at Dindigul. In both the cases, the said Kundumani has been arrayed as Accused No.3. After trial in both the cases, among other offences, he was convicted under Section 302 read with 149 IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment in each case, by common judgment dated 28.08.1985 and both the sentences were ordered to ...
Tag this Judgment!Ms.CavIn Kare Pvt. Ltd. Vs. District Valuation Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent herein to permit re-shipment/re-export of the cargo i.e. 854 kgs of imitation stones in 39 cartons covered under Master Airway Bill No.16047231612 dated 16.9.2010, issued by the shipper DACHSCR Hong Kong Limited, Hong Kong, in the control and custody of respondents herein.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.2. It has been stated that the petitioner company is engaged in the business of manufacturing and distribution of personal care and cosmetic products. The petitioner company had filed its return of income, before the second respondent, for the assessment years 2002-2003 to 2009-2010. The petitioner company had been regularly assessed by the second respondent, under Pan No.AAACB3754B. The petitioner company had filed its original return of wealth, for the ...
Tag this Judgment!M. Saravanan Vs. the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the first respondent herein in Revision Petition Nos.5126/2011/Sa.Pa and 5125/2011/Sa.Pa., respectively, dated 12.9.2011 and quash the same and consequently issue a suitable direction directing the first respondent herein to consider the revision petitions on merits after condoning the delay in filing the revision petitions filed under section 153 (1) of the Tamilnadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983.COMMON ORDER1. The prayer in these writ petitions are to quash the individual orders dated 12.9.2011 and direct the first respondent to consider the Revision Petitions filed under Section 153(1) of the Tamil Nadu Co-Operative Societies Act, 1983, on merits filed by the petitioners.2. The case of the petitioners in both the writ petitions are that they were working as Salesmen in Mohanur Primary Agricultural Co-Operative Bank S...
Tag this Judgment!N. Mathiyalagan and ors. Vs. the Assistant Executive Engineer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the first respondent from disconnecting the service connection in SC No.1202/TF IIIB at Mettur Main Road, Mocheri, SC No.299/TF IIIB at DP No.13/3 SIDCO Industrial Estate, Mettur and SC No. 129/TF IIIB at Eragundapatti Post, Mocheri respectively.COMMON ORDER1. Writ Petitions are filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the first respondent from disconnecting the service connection in SC No.1202/TF IIIB at Mettur Main Road, Mocheri, SC No.299/TF IIIB at DP No.13/3 SIDCO Industrial Estate, Mettur and SC No. 129/TF IIIB at Eragundapatti Post, Mocheri respectively.2. Mr. .S.K. Rameshwar, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the first respondent and Mr. M.S. Subramanian, Special Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the second respondent. By consent the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. ...
Tag this Judgment!E.Lights Techno Park Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Superintending Engineer and ors ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the representation dated 25.4.2012 made by the petitioner prior to issuing orders to energize the HT electric connection in the name of respondents 3 and 4 at Pacifia Tech Park, No.23, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, (Old Mahabalipuram Road), Chennai-603 103.O R D E R1. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the representation dated 25.4.2012 made by the petitioner prior to issuing orders to energize the HT electric connection in the name of respondents 3 and 4 at Pacifia Tech Park, No.23, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, (Old Mahabalipuram Road), Chennai-603 103.2. Mr.P.Gunaraj, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2. In view of the nature of order to be passed in this case, the notice to the respondents 3 to 5 is dispensed with. By consent, the writ petition is taken up ...
Tag this Judgment!Ms.Gemgranites Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
This writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to effect refund of Rs.29,83,512/- (twenty nine lakhs eighty three thousand five hundred and twelve) withO R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents.2. This writ petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent, to refund a sum of Rs.29,83,512/-, along with the interest on the said sum, at 18% per annum.3. It has been stated that the petitioner has been in the business of exporting granites, from the year, 1972. While so, the second respondent had conducted an auction for the granting of quarry lease for black and coloured granites, on 12.2.1990, in respect of 4.64.0 hectares, in S.No.14/4A2, in Puthiragoundanpalayam village, Athur Taluk, Salem District. The petitioner had participated in the tender. The petitioner...
Tag this Judgment!A.JacklIn Mery. Vs. the State Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
Writ Petition No.12479 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 4.4.2012 in the light of the orders passed in W.P.No.28789 of 2010 dated 21.12.2010 and till final decision is taken, not to disturb the running of the petitioner's shop near Ambedkar Colony Lane, Backside of Canal Park, Wallace Garden 1st Street, Chennai-600 006.Writ Petition No.12480 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 4.4.2012 in the light of the orders passed in W.P.No.28789 of 2010 dated 21.12.2010 and till final decision is taken, not to disturb the running of the petitioner's shop situated opposite to BSNL Office, Lake Area, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600034.Writ Petition No.12481 of 2012 is filed un...
Tag this Judgment!Ms.Green Peace Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Superintending Engineer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first and the second respondents herein to consider and provide electricity service connection to the petitioner in respective flats and for the common areas of the building on receiving applications and payments as stipulated by the Board from the petitioner forthwith for the residential flats put up in Block No.67, R.K.Shanmugam Salai, K.K.Nagar, Chennai-600 078 comprised in Old survey No.420, part, T.S.No.36/5 Block No.138, Part of Kodambakkam Village.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner had submitted that this Court, in similar matters, had directed the respondents concerned to provide electricity service connection, without insisting on the Completion ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »