Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

A.JacklIn Mery. Vs. the State Commissioner

A.JacklIn Mery. vs The State Commissioner

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 27, 2012
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/926906

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Writ Petition Nos.12479 to 12481 of 2012
Subject
Constitution

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[R.SUDHAKAR, J.] Constitution of India - Articles 226 -- Writ Petition No.12481 of 2012 is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 4.4.2012 in the light of the orders passed in W.P.No.28789 of 2010 dated 21.12.201...

Key legal issue
Constitution
Acts & sections
Constitution of India - Articles 226

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A.JacklIn Mery.

Advocate Mr.L.Chandrakumar, Adv.

Respondent

The State Commissioner

Advocate Mr.R.Vijayakumar, Adv.

Legal References

Acts
Constitution of India - Articles 226

Excerpt

[r.sudhakar, j.] constitution of india - articles 226 -- writ petition no.12481 of 2012 is filed praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 4.4.2012 in the light of the orders passed in w.p.no.28789 of 2010 dated 21.12.2010 and till final decision is taken, not to disturb the running of the petitioner's shop situated near kerala guest house, eurocon tiles house, opposite to greams lane, chennai-600006. for issuing licence or providing alternate site, petitioners submitted individual representation dated 4.4.2012 to the second respondent.writ petition no.12479 of 2012 is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 4.4.2012 in the light of the orders passed in w.p.no.28789 of 2010 dated 21.12.2010 and till final decision is taken, not to disturb the running of the petitioner's shop near ambedkar colony lane, backside of canal park, wallace garden 1st street, chennai-600 006.writ petition no.12480 of 2012 is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 4.4.2012 in the light of the orders passed in w.p.no.28789 of 2010 dated 21.12.2010 and till final decision is taken, not to disturb the running of the petitioner's shop situated opposite to bsnl office, lake area, nungambakkam, chennai-600034.writ petition no.12481 of 2012 is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 4.4.2012 in the light of the orders passed in w.p.no.28789 of 2010 dated 21.12.2010 and till final decision is taken, not to disturb the running of the petitioner's shop situated near kerala guest house, eurocon tiles house, opposite to greams lane, chennai-600006.common order1. writ petition no.12479 of 2012 is filed praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 4.4.2012 in the light of the orders passed in w.p.no.28789 of 2010 dated 21.12.2010 and till final decision is taken, not to disturb the running of the petitioner's shop near ambedkar colony lane, backside of canal park, wallace garden 1st street, chennai-600 006.2. writ petition no.12480 of 2012 is filed praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the.....

Full Judgment

Writ Petition No.12479 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 4.4.2012 in the light of the orders passed in W.P.No.28789 of 2010 dated 21.12.2010 and till final decision is taken, not to disturb the running of the petitioner's shop near Ambedkar Colony Lane, Backside of Canal Park, Wallace Garden 1st Street, Chennai-600 006.

Writ Petition No.12480 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 4.4.2012 in the light of the orders passed in W.P.No.28789 of 2010 dated 21.12.2010 and till final decision is taken, not to disturb the running of the petitioner's shop situated opposite to BSNL Office, Lake Area, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600034.

Writ Petition No.12481 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 4.4.2012 in the light of the orders passed in W.P.No.28789 of 2010 dated 21.12.2010 and till final decision is taken, not to disturb the running of the petitioner's shop situated near Kerala Guest House, Eurocon Tiles House, Opposite to Greams Lane, Chennai-600006.

COMMON ORDER

1. Writ Petition No.12479 of 2012 is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 4.4.2012 in the light of the orders passed in W.P.No.28789 of 2010 dated 21.12.2010 and till final decision is taken, not to disturb the running of the petitioner's shop near Ambedkar Colony Lane, Backside of Canal Park, Wallace Garden 1st Street, Chennai-600 006.

2. Writ Petition No.12480 of 2012 is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 4.4.2012 in the light of the orders passed in W.P.No.28789 of 2010 dated 21.12.2010 and till final decision is taken, not to disturb the running of the petitioner's shop situated opposite to BSNL Office, Lake Area, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600034.

3. Writ Petition No.12481 of 2012 is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 4.4.2012 in the light of the orders passed in W.P.No.28789 of 2010 dated 21.12.2010 and till final decision is taken, not to disturb the running of the petitioner's shop situated near Kerala Guest House, Eurocon Tiles House, Opposite to Greams Lane, Chennai-600006.

4. Mr.R.Vijayakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the first respondent and Mr.V.Bharathidasan, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the second respondent. The relief sought for in all three writ petitions is one and the same. By consent, all writ petitions are taken up together for final disposal.

5. The claim of all three petitioners is that they are physically handicapped persons and are running bunk shop separately in the above address. For issuing licence or providing alternate site, petitioners submitted individual representation dated 4.4.2012 to the second respondent.

6. Mr.V.Bharathidasan, learned counsel appearing for the second respondent states that the claim of the petitioners will be considered and placed before the appropriate committee constituted for this purpose.

7. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the second respondent, the second respondent is directed to consider the claim of the petitioners on merits and in accordance with law and place the same before the committee constituted for this purpose. Till final order is passed on the representation of the petitioners, if the bunk shops are located in the place mentioned above, it shall not be disturbed.

8. All the Writ Petitions are disposed of as above. No costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial