Chennai Court March 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.Gowthami Vs. the Regional Officer.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-09-2012
PrayerWrit petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the forth respondent to refund a sum of Rs.1,87,550/-(One lakh eighty seven thousand five hundred and fifty only) paid by the petitioner towards tuition and other fees for 2nd, 3rd and 4th year with interest at the rate of 12% till the date of realization.ORDER1. In this writ petition the petitioner is seeking for a direction to the 4th respondent-college to refund a sum of Rs.1,87,550/- paid by the petitioner towards the tuition and other fees for 2nd, 3rd and 4th year with interest.2.The case of the petitioner is that after completing the higher secondary course, she got admission at the 4th respondent-college in B.E. (Electrical and Electronic Engineering) course during the academic year 2007-2008. The petitioner had completed the first year course and she paid fees for the first year as required by the 4th respondent-college. She had also remitted a sum of Rs.81,550/- ...
S. Manickam Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-09-2012
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent in G.O.(1-D) No.98 School Education (D-2) Department, dated 2.5.2001 and quash the same and direct the third respondent to promote the petitioner as BT Assistant as per the order of the second respondent dated 27.5.1992 in the place of the fourth respondent with effect from the date of appointment of the fourth respondent and grant him all consequential benefits.ORDER1. This writ petition is filed to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent in G.O.(1-D) No.98 School Education (D-2) Department, dated 2.5.2001 and quash the same and direct the third respondent to promote the petitioner as BT Assistant as per the order of the second respondent dated 27.5.1992 in the place of the fourth respondent with effect from the date of appoin...
A.Santhanamary Vs. the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-09-2012
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 18.1.2012 and pass appropriate orders to retain the TASMAC Shop No.5638 at Door No.3A, Uththriya Mada Koil Street, Velankanni, Keezhvelur Taluk, Nagapattinam District.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.2. This writ petition has been filed praying for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 18.1.2012, and to pass appropriate orders thereon, to retain the Tamilnadu State Marketing Corporation Shop No.5638, located at Door No.3A, Uththriya Mada Koil Street, Velankanni, Keezhvelur Taluk, Nagapattinam District.3. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent had placed before this Court an order, dated 14.6.201...
S.Uma Vs. the Director of School Education.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-09-2012
Prayer in W.P(MD)No.14288 of 2011 Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for all records relating to the impugned order of the second respondent made in R.Dis.No.11671/A2/04, dated 07.12.2004 and the consequential order in proceedings of the third respondent dated 29.12.2006 and to quash the same and consequently to direct the respondents 1 to 3 herein to approve the appointment of the petitioner as P.G.Assistant(English) in the third respondent school from 28.05.2003 in regular time scale of pay with all emoluments, benefits and privileges insofar as the petitioner is concerned.Prayer in W.P(MD)No.14289 of 2011 Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for all records relating to the impugned order of the second respondent made in R.Dis.No.11672/A2/04, dated 07.12.2004 and the consequential or...
S.Malathi Vs. the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-09-2012
PrayerWrit petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the 3rd respondent in connection with the order passed in his Proc.Letter No. 493/UniA/Nir.P.2/U.3/ Ko.O.Na./2009 dated 05.11.2009 and quash the same and direct the respondents to provide compassionate appointment to the petitioner forthwith.ORDER1. In this writ petition the petitioner is seeking for quashing the order passed by the 3rd respondent dated 05.11.2009 and consequently, seeking for a direction to the respondents to provide compassionate appointment to the petitioner.2.The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner's father was working as Class IV employee (Helper) at the respondent's Electricity Board and died in harness on 22.05.2005, while he was in service. Within three years of the date of the death of the petitioner's father, the petitioner's brother, namely, one Elangovan made an application to the respondent...
Pan Global Trading Llc. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Sea).
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-09-2012
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in respect of and quash the letter of the 1st respondent bearing F.No.S.Misc 62/2011-Gr.3 & 4 dated 21-Apr-11 and directing the 1st respondent to permit amendment of the importer's name to the order of the petitioner in the Import General Manifest and bill of entry in respect of the goods covered by bill of lading No.861234168 issued by M/s.Maersk Line.ORDER1. The writ petition was listed under the caption `for withdrawal', based on the memo filed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had also sought the permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.2. Based on the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and in view of the memo filed by the counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed, as withdrawn. No costs. Consequentl...
Deni Alias Senthilkumar Vs. State Represented by the Inspector of Poli ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-09-2012
JUDGMENTP.DEVADASS,J.1. The accused in Sessions Case No.33 of 2010 before the Sessions Judge, Karur, who was convicted under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentenced to life and fined Rs.1,000/- with default sentence is the appellant.2. The prosecution case as told in the Sessions Court may be stated in brief as under:(1) Deceased Palaniammal @ Dhanamammal married Thangaraj. P.Ws.6 and 3 Loganathan and Kannan are their sons. Due to difference of opinion, the spouses separated. She lived in her mother's house in Chinna Kullathurpatti, Paganatham Village in Karur District. Thangaraj is residing somewhere.(2) P.Ws.6 and 3 studied in certain colleges in Trichirappalli. Palaniammal was employed in Karur Tex. She also did finance and lend money on jewels.(3) Once, accused Senthilkumar brought Palaniammal in his motor cycle and left her in her house. P.W.3 had seen this. Palaniammal used to wear gold chains, bangles and ear-stud. As she did not wear the chains, P.W.6 asked about it. She told him that...
A.Rajagopalan Vs. the District Collector and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-09-2012
JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, J)1. The present Writ Appeals are filed as against the common order of the learned single Judge dated 12.10.2011 passed in W.P.(MD)Nos.255, 189, 1394 of 2010, 12918, 12919, 13405 and 13757 of 2009 concerning promotion and drawing up of seniority list pursuant to the orders of the Apex Court in Civil Appeal Nos.2251 and 2252 of 2009 dated 8.4.2009.2. Before going into the rival contentions in the orders of the learned single Judge pursuant to the directions issued by the Apex Court, the facts herein need to be seen.(i) Under G.O.Ms.No.133, Revenue department dated 7.2.1995, the Government of Tamil Nadu brought an amendment to Rule 5(g) and Annexure III to the Special Rule of the Tamil Nadu Revenue Subordinate Service, whereunder, a classification was made in the matter of granting promotion between direct recruit assistants and promotees. The rule reads as follows:- AMENDMENTSin the said Special Rules:-(1) in rule 5, f...
Ms.Jaihind Spinning Mills (P) Limited. Vs. the Assistant Commissioner ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-09-2012
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to permit the petitioner to pay the entire arrears of tax amounting to Rs.7,18,552/- relating to the assessment year 2006-2007 under the CST Act, 1956, in 15 equated monthly instalments.O R D E R1. Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, the learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondent.2. Heard the learned counsels appearing for both sides.3.At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent had submitted that the entire arrears of tax, amounting to Rs.7,18,552/-, may be directed to be paid by the petitioner, in ten equated monthly intalments, beginning from 15.3.2012.4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had consented to pay the entire arrears of tax amount, as stated by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent.5. In view of the above, the petitioner shall pa...
C.Manikandan Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-09-2012
PrayerWrit petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by 3rd respondent Joint Director of Collegiate Education vide proceedings in O.Mu.No.9878/E3/2004 dated 03.01.2006, quash the same and further direct the respondents 2 and 3 herein to approve forthwith the petitioner's appointment as Waterman in the 5th respondent college from the date of his appointment on 04.04.1996 with the staff-grant towards his salary, allowances and all attendant benefits.ORDER1. In this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the 3rd respondent in his proceedings in O.Mu.No.9878/E3/2004 dated 03.01.2006 consequently, seeking for a direction to the respondents 2 and 3 to approve the petitioner's appointment as Waterman at the 5th respondent-college from the date of his appointment, namely, 04.04.1996 with salary and other attendant benefits.2.The case of ...