Chennai Court March 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P.A.Viswanath Vs. the Regional Transport Authority
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent herein to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's application for renewal of stage carriage permit in respect of the route Hosur to Thiruvannamalai for the period upto 28.12.2012, forthwith.O R D E R1. Mr.V.Jaya Prakash Narayanan, the learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondent.2. Though the prayer is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 25.1.2012, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period.3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the respondent is directed...
E.R.Jothieswari Vs. Sarojini.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-2012
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of of certiorari, calling for the cancellation deed Doc. No. 1492/2009 dated 14.9.2010 on the file of the S.R.O. Thukkanayakkanpalayam, Gobichettipalayam Taluk, Erode District and quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to delete the entries that reflects the aforesaid document from the 'A' Register maintained by the 2nd respondent herein.O R D E R1. The petitioner has invoked the extraordinary equitable jurisdiction of this Court with a prayer for issuance of writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the cancellation deed Doc.No.1492/2009 dated 14.09.2010 with consequential relief in the nature of Mandamus, for deleting the entries with regard to the said document from 'A' Register, maintained by the second respondent.2. The petitioner is the daughter of respondent no.1 K.Sarojini, who owned the property to the extent of 2/3rd undivided share out of 1.6...
P.C.Thangaraj Vs. the Director General of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-2012
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to restore the original seniority of the petitioner in terms of the judgement of the Division bench of this Honble Court in W.P.No.38792 and 38793 of 2003 dated 10.09.2007 which was implemented by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.724, Home (Police-III) Department, dated 14.08.2010 and to accord all service benefits like seniority, promotion, backwages and all other attendant service benefits to the petitioner.ORDER1. The petitioner is serving as Additional Superintendent of Police of Prohibition Enforcement Wing at Madurai, who was directly recruited as Sub Inspector of Police in 1976.2. After selection by the Tamilnadu Public Service Commission, the petitioner was deputed for training at Police Training College. In terms of Rule 25 of the Special Rules of the Tamilnadu State Police Subordinate Service Rules, the seniority of the Sub Inspector is to be fixed on the basis of ...
K.Munusami Vs. Govindaraj and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-2012
This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the order in I.A.No.1119 of 2007 in O.S.No.816 of 2000 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Vellore allowing the application for condoning the delay in seeking to set aside the exparte decree.ORDER1. The plaintiffs in O.S.No.816 of 2000 on the file of Additional District Munsif Court, Vellore are the revision petitioners. The above suit was filed for declaration of title and for permanent injunction and the suit was decreed exparte as prayed for on 01.08.2003.2.Thereafter, the respondents herein filed I.A.No.1119 of 2007 in O.S.No.816 of 2000 under Section 5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay of 1435 days in filing the application to set aside the exparte decree and that application was allowed on payment of costs of Rs.1500/- and aggrieved by the same, this revision petition is filed by the revision petitioners.3.Mr.P.Seshadri, learned counsel appearing for the revisio...
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›